User talk:Absolutiva

Your submission at Articles for creation: Royes Fernandez has been accepted

Royes Fernandez, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^Edits! Talk! 16:25, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pierrette Le Pen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marine. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sex offender

The article Sex offender you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sex offender for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PARAKANYAA -- PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:03, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Absolutiva. Thank you for your work on Shark Fins Act 2023. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia! May you and your family have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:49, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CIRCULAR at Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia

Hello!! Thank you for your good-faith contributions :)

I can understand why you mentioned the MOS:SELFREF in this context; however, I read WP:CIRCULAR and it seems like an exception can be made when Wikipedia is the subject of the article. I'm not sure why the content you removed was an exception of the exception (forgive me for the horrendous wording lol). If you have the time, can you please elaborate?

Cheers! x RozuRozu • ^tea_cups 07:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a reliable source (including The Signpost), and other Wikimedia projects (except Diff, news from Wikimedia movement) that fails WP:CIRCULAR. Also, linking to Wikipedia pages that are self-references should be avoided and which kinds are acceptable. Absolutiva (talk) 23:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tulsi Bhagat (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sohom Datta was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tulsi Bhagat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sohom (talk) 10:12, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Absolutiva! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sohom (talk) 10:12, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tulsi Bhagat (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tulsi Bhagat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 12:28, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]