|
User talk:Abhishek0831996Welcome!Hello, Abhishek0831996, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC) September 2016
Issue resolved ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Abhishek0831996. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) January 2017
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this: Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes) Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. Edit summary content is visible in: Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →
March 2017
April 2017
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this: Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes) Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. Edit summary content is visible in: Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →
 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. utcursch | talk 18:26, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Abhishek0831996. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Abhishek0831996. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Abhishek0831996. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) September 2019
Hello Abhishek0831996, your recent good-faith edits broke several Wiki-links and the table sorting, so I have reverted them for now. But I'd be glad to discuss eventual concerns and possible improvements on article talk. It would also be helpful to avoid misunderstandings if you would use edit summaries for all substantial changes in content or structure. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 07:28, 4 October 2019 (UTC) October 2019
November 2019
—SpacemanSpiff 11:53, 10 November 2019 (UTC) ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Disambiguation link notification for April 4An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mayo College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kangra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC) Incorrect reference of Madhu KaitabhaKumbhkarna is not incarnation of kaitabha or madhu. He is one of Jay / Vijaya. The other is Ravan's himself. Please provide reference to what is posted about Madhu Kaitabha. Sagardineshbarve (talk) 03:21, 16 April 2020 (UTC) Care to explain your edit to the Third battle of Panipat?? Your addition included no sources, and Kaushik Roy makes no mention of "Pyrrhic" victory.--Kansas Bear (talk) 05:07, 28 April 2020 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for May 15An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC) June 2020
Your submission at Articles for creation: Maharaja Ranjit Singh (series) has been accepted Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Sulfurboy (talk) 00:25, 7 June 2020 (UTC)Vandalism?I'm not sure how you explain this edit but your gross figure doesn't match the 49.29 crore in the source. Be more careful moving forward, please. And your change from Box Office India to Bollywood Hungama for the budget isn't much of an improvement, since both sources included print and advertising costs, which should not be factored into budget. Budget = cost of production only. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:07, 22 June 2020 (UTC) I mentioned the India gross only Abhishek0831996 (talk) 05:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC) DS alert This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Understand what constitute a personal attack, the comment of Nomian also pointed to the personal attack by the IP. Restoring blatant personal attacks (like "Stop being so thankless and dishonest to actual events of Bangladeshi history") on talk pages means you are contributing to the disruption and making the discussion uncivil. It also appears you are trying to disrupt the discussion by asking an unnecessary question which was already answered while the NPOV template had also been removed. Za-ari-masen (talk) 08:33, 21 August 2020 (UTC) Peace Spread the peace by adding {{subst:Peace pipe}} to someone's talk page! You can use a parameter to insert the name of the recipient and add your own text to the message with a second. Smoking this wiki-peace pipe does not affect your health. We met at a bitter dispute spread over one talk, a handful of user talks and a couple of ANIs, not the best places to meet fellow editors. I regret my loss of cool, which I hope haven't damaged the possibility of you and I collaborating in future, on something. After all we are often interested in similar articles, and we all want to improve them to the best of our abilities. Maybe sometime we could have a beer together, or
Mahameghavahana dynastyHi, you left a ref tag ("ref name=Shailendra_1999") undefined here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for September 30An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 30 September 2020 (UTC) Looks like we are nearing a consensus. Won't you make a comment now? Aditya(talk • contribs) 05:17, 10 October 2020 (UTC) ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
December 2020
I apologise for removing your comments. It wasn't by mistake. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 04:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC) I mean it was by mistake Abhishek0831996 (talk) 04:30, 12 December 2020 (UTC) List of RajputsI'm unable to understand what you meant by Maintaining timeline. Can you elaborate? Typically lists are maintained alphabetically as per the surnames. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:10, 10 December 2020 (UTC) I mean sequencing them according to their year of birth. Sorry for my English Abhishek0831996 (talk) 17:13, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Chronology OrderHello Again Abhishek0831996 thanks for restoring info on List of Rajputs page anyway That user Again Remove Prithviraj Chauhan from list so keep that in ur watchlist.
Sure, I'll be making improvements on these pages. They're in my watchlist Abhishek0831996 (talk) 03:04, 12 December 2020 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Thanks Abhishek0831996 (talk) 01:55, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
December 2020
Ok, Actually I was in a hurry, will keep that in mind from now on. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 04:32, 12 December 2020 (UTC) Removal of Prithviraj Chauhan AgainPrithviraj Chauhan has been removed again on List of Rajputs page kindly keep the page in Your watchlist.2409:4051:4E91:64BB:BC7B:5AA9:7172:2AF4 (talk) 04:11, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
I am giving u a link to Kaushik Roy page which mention Prithviraj as a Rajput
He informed me before I saw it myself. I would've anyway reverted it. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 02:13, 13 December 2020 (UTC) Is there any other reason you want to give other than this Abhishek0831996 (talk) 02:33, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Get over the proxy thing and go back to the page's edit history to see how many times I've tried to improve the page, so in future whenever I would've visited the page, I would've definitely gone into the discussion of why the name was removed. And calling Kaushik Roy a nobody shows your arrogance, he is a budding historian. Here's the link if you want to know who he is - www Removed Again
Poor Excuses
You are right. After going through their recent edit history. It is pretty clear that they have an agenda against the community. They have also coined a half baked term Rajputization to further their agenda. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 07:16, 14 December 2020 (UTC) Hi Abhishek and other user, Lukeemily and heba have a agenda and they started vandalising a single community pages. I have been reading these pages and it is very disturbing. Even chariotrider is favouring them. Take a look at the time they joined and look at the edits they habe made. Mostly towards a single community please if you have authority or if you can contact proper authority please take down those pages and restore the previous. Jbinsan (talk) 10:55, 17 December 2020 (UTC) Selective removal of Content
Thank you for reminding, I'm working on how to counter that narrative but it'll take some time, will surely try to get the original information back. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 05:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC) Some baklava for you!
A Reuqest
Thank you for reminding, I'm working on how to counter that narrative but it'll take some time, will surely try to get the original information back. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 05:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 23An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rajput resistance to Muslim conquests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ranthambore. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 23 March 2021 (UTC) April 2021
Sure Abhishek0831996 (talk) 11:42, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
"Misrepresentation"?Is there any other reason why you removed references to the prime minister's campaign rallies from the COVID-19 pandemic in India article as being among events cited as superspreaders? This statement is supported by sources, though I expanded it to acknowledge one of them saying the elections in general may have been issues too. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:58, 24 April 2021 (UTC) Covid daily cases IndiaHighest ever recorded daily new cases in USA was 313,000[1] not 403,000 as you claimed when undoing my edit. —CHANDLERMINH (tok!) 09:05, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Re:And your basis for your argument against this coverage is an editorial piece with obviously dissenting opinions ("we know, from painful experience, that lockdowns don’t work") rather than an objective finding that the gatherings have not led to spikes in the areas where they are being held. The citations included several major news organizations (Bloomberg, Reuters) does not make it "unsourced or poorly sourced" as specified by BLP. BLP does not say that negative information about living persons cannot be included at all, it must strictly abide by verifiability, the neutral point of view, and no original research. ViperSnake151 Talk 05:48, 28 April 2021 (UTC) A cup of tea for you!
A barnstar for you!
Discussion at Talk:Prithviraj Chauhan
SockCan you explain how User:Naveen Ramanathan is a sock diff? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 11:00, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions notificationThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. FDW777 (talk) 07:34, 31 August 2021 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for September 1An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Indian battles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jinji. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 1 September 2021 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for November 19An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abhimanyu Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aks. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC) ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Nakul Kapoor moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, Nakul Kapoor, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " There was no puffery in the edits you reverted on Madhubala. You even reverted so many important changes and references and left nothing but just a skeleton. I've spent 2 years in bringing that article from nothing to everything and it hurted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4053:498:1E60:19BB:17F8:E7A3:C1BA (talk) 15:05, 2 May 2022 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for May 27An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raja, Rasoi Aur Anya Kahaniyaan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rampur. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Inappropriate revhere. why did you rev thisNalasopara (talk) 11:38, 27 June 2022 (UTC) (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC) Biased opinions on article about GirnarIt has comes to my attention that article about mountain Girnar. If you look at it it is highly biased and depicted as the sight only for Jain community. If you look at references too, you will find that many are not appropriate/proper. Unfortunately, I am not in the position to do anything about it as my changes are getting reverted. You seem like a good unbiased Wikipedia editor and supporter. Can you please take a deeper look at the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girnar ( You can see in the history that even your change got reverted right away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tannaray68 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 5 July 2022 (UTC) ReviewKohra (estate)👇 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kohra_(estate) DrhSR (talk) 23:31, 10 September 2022 (UTC) ArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Please finish your sentence "In 2018, there were". Xx236 (talk) 10:00, 30 November 2022 (UTC) Rinku SinghJust a heads up: It looks like a talk page discussion resulted in moving the page just a few months ago. It may be I’ll-advised to undo the results of that discussion unless there is evidence that consensus has changed. Larry Hockett (Talk) 08:35, 25 March 2023 (UTC) Introduction to contentious topicsYou have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project. Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 15:36, 6 April 2023 (UTC) ThanksThanks for the ping, will read the long section tomorrow. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Mahatma Gandhi final fast discussionI got curious about the actual content issue at the center of the dispute at the Gandhi article and started reading the Misinformation on lede section. But it's pretty long and interspersed with too much mudslinging that detracts from the content issue itself. So can I request you to give me a list of diffs (or just date and time-stamps of the posts, which I can then CTRL-F) that I should read to understand your side of the argument? I am looking only for posts like your first one, which mention or quote from specific sources and not the ones that interpret/debate those sources. Thanks for your help. Abecedare (talk) 03:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC) Sources in BLPsAbhishek0831996, you've been here for quite some time, so you must be aware that you need to include reliable sources when adding content to articles, especially biographies of living persons. I've reverted your addition of personal info to the infobox at Sonia Singh as it was added without any reliably-sourced article content supporting its inclusion as is required by the policies I've linked to, as well as Template:Infobox person.-- Ponyobons mots 19:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Ram MandirHey, thanks for the additons. But since, as you may already know, that the article comes under contentious topics, just be extra careful when you all references. As you've been alerted before, Times of India is deemed as an unreliable source per WP:TOI and I have removed the citations and texts from TOI. So adding unreliable sources into a contentious topic can come under disruptive editing. Just a heads up about that. Feel free to add more on the controversy section (which IMO, was much needed), but with sources that are reliable. Thanks and happy editing. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Govind Ballabh PantHi, it is regarding this edit. The paragrah you added needs to be trimmed and reworded from Pant's perspective. At the moment it is from the the Mandir issue's perspective. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:14, 22 January 2024 (UTC) February 2024
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 09:14, 18 February 2024 (UTC) Koimoi under unreliable list in WP:ICTFSOURCESScroll down to unreliable list on WP:ICTFSOURCES. Ctrl + F also helps, and you will see koimoi included in the list. Not reliable The following should not be considered reliable sources. If an otherwise reliable source attributes information to an unreliable source then that information is likewise unreliable. (see WP:FRUIT) Any "blog" of "blog"-type websites, in particular (see WP:BLOGS) Allindiansite.com Andhra Box Office Andhra Cafe Andhrakaburlu.com Assamtimes.org (discussed here) auditionform.in Bestoftheyear.in (see bestoftheyear.in) Bollymoviereviewz.com Bollyspice.com Bollywoodbubble.com Bollywoodlife.com (discussed here) bollywoodsociety.com (discussed here) Cinechicken (discussed here) Cinegoer.com Dailyhunt.in (blacklisted, discussed here) dailymovieupdates.com Dreamdth.com Greatandhra.com Filmibeat.com Indiaforums.com Indiglamour.com International Business Times by IBT Media (see WP:IBTIMES) Iwmbuzz.com (discussed here) Jan Bharat Times (discussed here) KeralaDaily Kollytalk.com Koimoi nettv4u.com Nowrunning.com Oneindia.in OpIndia (see WP:OPINDIA) Radio Sargam Republic TV (see WP:REPUBLICTV) Sacnilk.com (discussed here) Sahi Nahi (discussed here) serialupdates.me spicyonion.com streamingdue.com Televisionpost.com TellyChakkar (discussed here) Tellydhamaal.com Tellytadka.com Tellyupdates.com TheReviewMonk (discussed here) Upperstall.com RangersRus (talk) 04:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Contentious topics reminder
March 2024
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:59, 27 March 2024 (UTC) Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussionHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Abhishek0831996. Thank you. - Kautilya3 (talk) 17:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC) Notice about discussion at WP:ANI
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
DRV follow-upHello. You were the applicant at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 May 31, and made the statement "This is contrary to the fact that admins should be so confident about their closure that they should not expect a DRV with regards to their closure" in your original application post. A number of established editors have challenged this statement in good faith, and at least one has asked you (with a ping) to return to the debate to provide further elaboration. I note you have been actively editing, can you please look to engage with the question asked in response by Ravenswing at 09:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)? (Searcing that timestamp should allow you to find the comment easily.) Alternatively, if you no longer stand by the statement, you are welcome to Regards
Gandhi's last fast in January 1948Later tonight, I will be adding a different, and more comprehensive, version of the disputed lead sentences on Gandhi's last fast in Mahatma Gandhi, which will be supported by different sources, all published after 2022 by internationally recognized university presses. I will put up an "inuse" sign before I make my edits, which will not take me more than half an hour. I trust that you will not make any edits to he lead during this time, let alone revert my edits, as you did here. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 00:45, 13 August 2024 (UTC) did you mean to type keep instead of delete?At Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_comedy_anime you said:
I assume you are using a bot helper and clicked the delete instead of keep by mistake. Dream Focus 11:59, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
October 2024
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ekdalian (talk) 07:39, 10 October 2024 (UTC) ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
