Hello, Gaurav 3894! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! — kashmīrīTALK14:25, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created, Aditya Narayan Singh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GermanKity (talk) 06:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Mahip Narayan Singh instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mahip Narayan Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mahip Narayan Singh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Gaurav 3894!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 12:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
August 2021
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Narayan dynasty into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Diannaa well i did not copy it from someone actully it was just me but with a different id [which is not registerd] because it belonged to my mom so i did not made an id or logged to mine , if you want i can prove it but i will take some time as i have to go to my mom's place . Second thing i copied from myself to the other page because as you can see there has been an edit and the things are not same and i was working on them too Gaurav 3894 (talk) 02:39, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
I have permitted Gaurav Rai to use my system for editing the page and contribting his content.103.68.32.24 (talk) 02:54, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[[User:Kashmiri|<sup style="color:#80f;font:'Candara';"]the passage underwent through many edit but none of them were same and what do you expect me to do write new history or what and i and other editors were working on the topic and you without discussing the topic putting it into draft was not at all right . i feel like you have some issue with me because in the bhumihar article you wanted me to get banned because i kept my point . here you are putting my hours effort into draft just like that without even talking, do you have any any knowledge on the topic ?? if you dont have then how can you just put things into draft without even talking to the people who have Gaurav 3894 (talk) 10:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bharatendu Harishchandra. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
Cross namespace issues mostly arise from making a link from a mainspace article to a page that is in Draft: or User: space. They are resolved by removing the link, that is, by removing the double brackets and any namespace designator, just leaving the intended subject of the link as plain text. It may happen that a link can be re-instated if the target page is later advanced to mainspace.
I wasn't able to discern how this question is related to the heading, though. Perhaps you need to explain better what your question is and link to any pages that are related. — jmcgnh(talk)(contribs)03:53, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't sound like a reason a page would be deleted.
You still have a page at Draft:Ishwari Prasad Narayan Singh - but as I understand it, the problem there (or one of the problems) was not cross name-space linking but copy-pasting Wikipedia content from one page to another without attribution. You can fix the lack of attribution retroactively by placing a notice on the talk page or in an edit summary - ideally such an attribution will point to a specific revision of a page used as the source (since pages are dynamic and can change by small or large amounts between revisions), but I've seen people get by with a much more general attribution. Also, it seems necessary to point out to you that this attribution is required even when you are the original contributor of the copied material. For more details, I'll point you (again) to COPYWITHIN.
