|
User talk:Ekdalian
This user is aware of the three-revert rule
Happy Xmas Seasonal Greets!
== Seasonal Greets! ==
Cup of tea
ThanksThanks for your note and help. A Dutt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adutt77 (talk • contribs) 14:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Snippet viewsPlease do not use Google Books snippet views, for which we have no sense of context and which very frequently end up misrepresenting the source when it comes to caste articles. I thought I had mentioned this to you before but I'm not digging around to find it. - Sitush (talk) 11:13, 23 February 2015 (UTC) Greets!
Hi, Happy New Year Ekdalian!.jpg)  Ekdalian, Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to user talk pages.
Talkback Message added 17:50, 2 May 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. MahenSingha (Talk) 17:50, 2 May 2016 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Ekdalian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Train-the-Trainer 2017: Invitation to participateHello Ekdalian, What is TTT? Who should join?
Please see more about this program and apply to participate or encourage the deserving candidates from your community to do so: CIS-A2K/Events/Train the Trainer Program/2017 The last date of filling the form is 26 January. If you have any question, please leave your message here. Disambiguation link notification for April 16Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mahishya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kaibarta. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 16 April 2017 (UTC) British Judgements about Kayastha statusDear Ekdalian, You can see The Indian Law Reports: Calcutta series, Volume 10 By India. High Court (Calcutta, India) page 465.It is freely available on the web. In this case I thought it was essential to read the British Judgement. It is clear after reading this 1884 judgement that the British court considered only the customs(and varna) of specific regional Kayasthas and made their judgement on only certain particular Kayasthas of some regions. (It is explicitly mentioned in the judgement as to what they took into account). So to make a blanket statement about all Indians (of the community) is not right IMHO ; especially if it is offensive. Secondly , there have been judgments made much later by the British as well as census reports by British that classify Kayastha as Kshatriya. In the view of the above facts, it is obvious that the "them" pronoun mentioned by the author you quote is referring to the last noun in that sentence(page 202 of Rowe) i.e. Bengali kayasthas. Either that is what the author meant or the author has been careless in framing the sentence. This is obvious from the judgement itself. In any case , if there are conflicting opinions , it is best to avoid one sided/biased views since they have an agenda(especially that can be hurtful to a community). BTW, I am neither Bengali not do I belong to the above community, nor am I in India. I only have interest in the literate castes of India (like Brahmins and Kayasthas) and their history. Just my two cents. Regards, M. Acharya. ps. I am new to Wikipedia. Please guide me if I am incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acharya63 (talk • contribs) 05:19, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Mythology Namasudra(Namassej) and Manoranja ByapariRegarding your comment on the talk page on the basis of which the mythology of this Hindu-apartheid vindicated community has been deleted , I humbly want to inform you that do not AGREE WITH. Firstly Only writer of International recognition to have mentioned the Mythology is Manoranjan Byapari . He is , not was as you have written . He is not promoting Dalit Writing that much . Rather he did not get any publicity though his Autobigraphical Discourse ( not a Novel ) is not about Dalits , rather a discourse about the Oppressed People In General ; unfortunately being a victim of Hindu Apartheid he faced personally many problems , and one of those is Destroy His writing . And what you have written the truth is just the opposite of that , Rather The Dalit Literature Promoted Him. Now neiter Sekhar Badyopadhyay , Nor Joya Chatterjee , nor any Caste Hindu Writer , whose reference is in your list , has mentioned the Mythology , is that a community fault , is that enough reason that for this a Bangla Academy Award winner writer becomes unreliable , although any such past writers , have been used in many India related articles as reliable source , is that him being outcaste , an Avarna , makes his writing , the autobiographical Discourse , an unreliable source ? I want your permission to use both his writing and another Ph.D thesis of a member of this Avarna community to be permitted being used as reliable source . If the Varna Hindu samaj due to their hatred and Apartheid inherent in their Hindu Religion ignores and omits our mythology , then it is not our fault , and I strongly believe , that the editors should take the discourses written by our community members as reliable source . প্রাকৃতনমঃস্বেজ (talk) 04:49, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Harichand Thakur /Matua mahasnagha etc and Sipra MukherjeeThe scholar Sipra Mukherjee in her writing has written that In Matuya movement 'Chamar , Mahishya , mali ........ etc." communities joined.I have written In Bengal Not "Chamar" the term is "Muchi/Muchiram" , "Ruhidas" or "Rishidas" etc .Their population is also not much. And the "Chamars' we find in urban Bengal now came mainly from Bihar . But Sipra Mukherjee has written so , got a publisher like elite and so Sitush did not allow and I think you will not also . The upper caste people are changing things in the discourse . Erasing the original myths and etc. It is miserable . In the main book of Mtuya primarily Harichand not acknowledged as "Avatar" but the Mukherjee has so written . You are a Bengali Upper Caste . I do not know about Sitush. But you must be aware of the distortion . The tragedy is that Harilialmrito itself cannot be used as a source book as it has no English Translation and secondly for being not written by a Reliable Person ( Tarak Sarkar , is an untouchable lower caste practically uneducated non-pundit ). I am not asking for any correction . For a suggestion as what could be done?117.194.195.149 (talk) 06:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Ekdalian. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Hmm....See the edit-summary at this edit of mine.Best,∯WBGconverse 14:08, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Nath castThis is wrong information about nath cast i am edit again Naveennath6966 (talk) 03:50, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Ekdalian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Conduct research before reversing editsMr. Ekdalian, me being blocked from Wikipedia won't necessarily cover up or alter the truth. The Kayasthas have been legally accorded Kshatriya status. Do conduct at least SOME research before reversing the edits. Thank you. Regards from Semper Curious Semper Curious (talk) 06:59, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Read the article on KayasthaDo consult the article on the exact Varna status of Kayasthas.. That Wikipedia has to offer. We don't have our version of truth... But one should not hold himself from accepting the truth Semper Curious (talk) 08:34, 24 June 2019 (UTC) Here's what you demandThe last census of the British Raj in India (1931) classified them as an 'upper caste' i.e. Dwija and the final British Raj law case involving their varna in 1926 placed them into the Kashtriya varna. According to W.Rowe's account (that later scholars disagreed with), during the British Raj era, certain law cases led to courts classifying Kayasthas as shudras, based largely upon the theories of Herbert Hope Risley who had conducted extensive studies on castes and tribes of the Bengal Presidency. According to Rowe, the Kayasthas of Bengal, Bombay and the United Provinces repeatedly challenged this classification by producing a flood of books, pamphlets, family histories and journals to pressurize the government for recognizing them as Kshatriya and to reform the caste practices in the directions of sanskritisation and westernisation. However, scholars from the University of Berkeley as well as the University of Cambridge have disagreed with Rowe's research by pinpointing 'factual and interpretative errors' in his study as well as criticizing his study for making 'unquestioned assumptions' about the kayastha movement of sanskritisation and westernisation. H.Bellenoit gives the details of the individual British Raj era law cases and concludes that since the kayasthas are a non-cohesive group and not a single caste, their varna was resolved in the cases that came up by taking into account regional differences and customs followed by that particular caste. Bellenoit also disagrees with W.Rowe by showing that Herbert Hope Risley's theories were in fact used to ultimately classify them as Kshatriyas by the British courts. The first case began in 1860 in Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh with a property dispute where the plaintiff was considered an 'illegitimate child' by the defendants, a north-Indian Kayastha family. The British court denied inheritance to the child, citing that Kayasthas are Dvija, "twice-born" or "upper-caste" and that the illegitimate children of Dwijas have no rights to inheritance. In the next case in 1875 in the Allahabad High Court, a north Indian Kayastha widow was denied adoption rights as she was an upper-caste i.e. Dwija woman. However, in an 1884 adoption case as well as a 1916 property dispute, Calcutta High Court argued that Bengali kayasthas have started using names like 'Das' and classified the Bengali Kayasthas as shudras - although the court did acknowledge their Kshatriya origin. The Allahabad High Court ruled in 1890 that Kayasthas were Kshatriyas. Finally, in a property dispute case in Patna in 1926, the Patna court characterized both the 1884 and 1916 Calcutta courts rulings as inconclusive and ultimately ruled that the kayasthas were of Kshatriya origin and hence twice born or dwija. The Patna court cited smritis and Puranas, several colonial ethnologists, such as William Crooke and Herbert Hope Risley, and used their qualified endorsements on the dwija origins of Kayasthas. The British census of 1931 also lists Kayasthas as one of the upper (twice-born) castes. Semper Curious (talk) 08:39, 24 June 2019 (UTC) NathPlz don't chnage about nath coz nath are high ranked brahmins they are called rudraj brhamins nowadays debnath nath don't get obcs maybe earlier time they got but nowadays they didn't so they are recognized as brhamins.plz sir don't chnage it thus is real don't call a brahmin other backward class Siddy0070 (talk) 06:49, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Don't refer non-vandalistic edits a 'vandalism'. See WP:NOTVAND. Try addressing concerns on talk page before restoring any WP:OR unsupported by source. Aman Kumar Goel(Talk) 13:18, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Bengali KayasthasI included those surnames because they are listed on the same page and because multiple source materials reference these very names. Melotown (talk) 16:33, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Ambasth KayasthasHi Ekdalian, Would like to have a discussion about Ambasth Kayasthas. I added a few contents which have been edited out by you. Ambasth kayasthas are not just confined to Bengal. They're widespread in Punjab,Bihar and Jharkhand regions mainly and also in MP,Chattisgarh etc. Ambasth Kayasthas are Brahmin Kayasthas or Brahm-Kayasthas. This confusion between Ambasthas and Vaidyas exists only in Bengal and nowhere else. Instead of clubbing the Ambasthas of all regions of India,you should allow to write the truth in wikipedia. I'd like to know your source which you're using. The Ambashtha Kayasthas (found chiefly in Southern Bihar), Crooke suggests "may be connected with the old Ambastha caste of Western-Punjab mentioned in the Mahabharata" as some Kayasthas are also associated with the practice of medicine and surgery.[42][32] Note:You haven't added anything on that page,instead you've intentionally removed the edits made by other users. It's known as vandalism. Note:Please tell me your source. Dinopce (talk) 12:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello Ekdalian, I understand your concern about the addition of unsourced POV edits but I added the paragraphs in the introduction section from Ambasth Kayasth book written by K.N Sahay. It's not merely about providing the reference from where you've taken the information. You've simply quoted the sentences from the books that you like but when I added the following paragraph, Barhaspatya Arthashastra-The Ambastha were so important in the early centuries before Christ there is an Ambastha Sutra in the Pali work. "Ambasth here are represented as Brahmins. The Puranas call them Anaya Kshatriyas." from the K. Sahay book,it was reverted by you. May I know the reason why??! Mr. Ekdalian,your article itself is ambiguous. You've quoted that Ambasthas are from Brahmin father and Vaishya mother and the son begotten by a Brahmin father in all the 3 castes is a Brahmin. Once again,you've quoted this sentence from a book and even provided the reference but you've intertwined the Caste and Varna(categories of Hinduism) here. Then in the 3rd paragraph you've written about the Ambasth tribe in Mahabharat which clearly makes them Kshatriya. As a citizen of India and a commoner in front of you(and not an Ambasth Kayasth), it doesn't MAKE ANY SENSE. It clearly seems to me like intentional degradation of a particular community by you,Mr.Ekdalian. Mere quoting from a book isn't sufficient,it should also make sense. Anyone who will read your wikipedia page will understand that it's ambiguous. It's not about being a Kayasth or a Brahmin(caste) and not Varna. Everyone should have the right to add to wikipedia(quick Encyclopedia) but unnecessary degradation of a particular community is what I'm against. I hope that it's not your intention and I'd like to make further changes in this page Mr.Eklavian. Plz don't use Wikipedia to spread wrong information like this. Please correct me if I'm wrong but Wikipedia doesn't just require quoted statements only; instead they encourage the usage of adding info in YOUR OWN WORDS.
Dinopce (talk) 16:21, 6 March 2020 (UTC) Last but not the least, there's heaven and hell difference between Brahmin(varna) and Brahman(principle related to the cosmos). Your article intertwines everything! Brahmin varna,Brahmin caste and Brahman(metaphysical concept of the Brahmaand or universe. Your references are useless if your article doesn't make any sense. Mr.Ekdalian or let me put it in a straight forward way,Mr.Bengali Brahmin(caste),plz don't try to defame any particular community. Note:If that's not your intention and if it's my mistake of judging you wrongly, then I'm sorry that your article made me think that way about you. Namaste. Dinopce (talk) 16:32, 6 March 2020 (UTC) Just found one more thing in your article that caught my eye. The following "This differentiates the Ambasthas from the average Vaidyas, who were considered "unclean" and were denied the status accorded to the Ambastha.[6]". Baidya are considered as Bhadralok in Bengal. You've called them as UNCLEAN. Wikipedia is about writing about something so that the common people who don't have any knowledge about that topic can easily gain knowledge about it. What you're doing here is not knowledge sharing but misusing your right as an administrator of this page which was clearly created by you to spew false information about Ambasth Kayasthas as whole. Mr. Bengali Brahmin. I've got deep respect for Brahmins(priests). I'm a Hindu and this is what my sanskaar teaches me. But your intentions don't seem clear to me!! You're spewing venom against two communities of Bengal who are considered Bhadralok over there. BAIDYAS are also considered Brahmins only. Let me give you my perspective without any quotations or references from any book. The importance of varna or caste for that matter is the trait. It's in our genes! I already told you about the confusion between Ambasthas and Vaidyas in Bengal but you didn't consider it. Kayasthas are not the only ones who had mixed blood. Manusmriti is a live example of the Brahmin's misuse of their power. But nobody has written anything against the Brahmins in the Brahmin page. This entire page is a clear misuse of your adminstrator rights. Nothing more and nothing less!! Note:You've got administrator rights of this page. Please make judicious use of your power and spread knowledge for the betterment of the society and not to destroy the image of 2 of the communities which are part of your Bengali society specifically. Namaste Dinopce (talk) 18:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ekdalian, I've added the paragraph space between the "Ambastha from Brahmin father...." AND "Ambastha also refers to a sub-caste of Kayasthas....". This was creating a lot of confusion. I hope you'll not revert it this time!! Also,I have a query. The Ambashtha Kayasthas (found chiefly in Southern Bihar), Crooke suggests "may be connected with the old Ambastha caste of Western-Punjab mentioned in the Mahabharata" as some Kayasthas are also associated with the practice of medicine and surgery.[1][2] What is wrong with my edit above? I've provided the source and reference as well. Why Dinopce (talk) 11:33, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
2nd link is showing error here. Must have missed a letter over there Dinopce (talk) 11:35, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
"But Bihar was not the original homeland of the Ambashthas." What do you understand from the previous sentence? :) Dinopce (talk) 05:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC) Earlier Bihar meant Magadh region of Bihar. The Magadh region falls currently in the Southern-Bihar and Northern Jharkhand region. Dinopce (talk) 05:35, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Ok. Ekdalian. Give me some time. If I'll not be able to find the South-Bihar part. I'm ready to get it revert to only Bihar which is evident above. Dinopce (talk) 05:52, 11 March 2020 (UTC) https://books.google.co.in/books?id=MihuAAAAMAAJ&q=South&hl=en Pg60: It's mentioned South Bihar Dinopce (talk) 06:39, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha...Hi@Ekdalian It's regarding this line "The functionality of the Kayasthas, who identified themselves with "Chitragupta and paper-oriented service", was more significant before the 1870s, and historically, their caste status has been ambiguous." I couldn't see any such thing written in the link that you've provided. Can you provide the proper link? Dinopce (talk) 09:37, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
"speech,a consumption of goat flesh and a shared affinity for wine.74 And even though Kayastha would not become a caste category until the later nineteenth century,75 what was more significant before the 1870s was the functionality of.... No preview available for this page"
"The functionality of the Kayasthas, who identified themselves with "Chitragupta and paper-oriented service", was more significant before the 1870s, and historically, their caste status has been ambiguous"
Sock attackCan I interest you in semiprotection of this page for a few days, Ekdalian? Bishonen | tålk 19:52, 20 April 2020 (UTC).
A kitten for you! You are most welcome. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:58, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Last Warning for Vandalism !Don't Create obstacle to add content to Sen (surname) and don't vandalism! Dr.SunBD (talk) 20:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Thank youI thank you so much for your recent work on the Karanam (caste) page. I really needed you. I had been deeply saddened by the vandalism there. Wish you joy and peace! Ayushsinha2222 (talk) 19:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
See now AmbattanSir, dont delete Ambattan details. I try to put best data only. Waked Bold Ambushed (talk) 11:40, 4 April 2021 (UTC) Sir help me improve the Ambashtha details including Ayurvedic, Tamilnadu and Sri Lanka. Waked Bold Ambushed (talk) 17:14, 7 April 2021 (UTC) April 2021
Kindly dont remove my edits in kumharKindly don't remove my deletion in kumhar state division. Prajapati and kumhar not added in SC so far. So till that there is no need of adding that particular inclusion list new in community page. Let me know if we need to have a detail conversation Thanks in advance. Tamilan pugal (talk) 16:26, 23 April 2021 (UTC) Can we not report Heba Aisha?Hello, we have all seen what Heba Aisha is doing to articles on communities. Can we not bring in admin's attention? Do we have no way to stop her motivated disrupting editing? I am sure we can do something together. Ayushsinha2222 (talk) 10:33, 26 April 2021 (UTC) Should we need to follow Manusmriti?Are you still believe in Manusmriti? Even Indian govt not following that in now a days. Kindly let me know detail conversation. Tamilan pugal (talk) 20:32, 12 May 2021 (UTC) Hi Ekdlian - I have deleted Sudra Varna in this page. I know some people in India still following manusmriti. I think this is not a page to protarit them as a Shudra. Reason why i deleted this content is , they will feel bad after visiting this page. Even Wikipedia not protariting them in a good way. So Kindly don't revert that content without my knowledge. Looking forward for your response Tamilan pugal (talk) 21:19, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Sure. I just checked other pages as well.Thank you for make me understand. Tamilan pugal (talk) 19:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC) Topic - The Ghoshal pageHi, first of all, you learn about the title - Ghoshal. And then you do edits. It is already written in other pages that Ghoshal title is a Brahmin title. Professionalwriter1 (talk) 13:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Okay, wait for some time and I will give some reliable sources to let others know that Ghosal is a brahmin title. Professionalwriter1 (talk) 15:47, 25 May 2021 (UTC) The Dutta PageHi * Ekdalian, Before removing my edits on the Dutta page, first try to learn about the title- Dutta. Many of the people don't know about the title Dutta correctly. You are also one of them. Dutta is my title and I think that as Dutta is my title, I know a lot more about my title than you know. So try learning about the title Dutta from various sites before removing other's edits. From,
Okay, so I have replied to *Bishoen yesterday that from now I will no longer do any kinds of edits in this Wikipedia page. Thank you. Professionalwriter1 (talk) 06:34, 31 May 2021 (UTC) Probable Vandalism in Ambastha pageUser:Ekdalian pls check the recent changes in Ambastha page. Thanks. Abhishek Sengupta 24 (talk) 16:19, 14 June 2021 (UTC) New message from TrangaBellam
New message from TrangaBellam
Bengali BrahminStop reverting it. Nadia Raj family is descendant of Bhattanarayan. Bengali Brahmins are traditionally followers of Shakti Kalikula tradition. refer this http://www.mainstreamweekly.net/article5882.html Then do the necessary.
There are enough sources available. I even provided the references. It is quite annoying the way you guys are subduing relevant sources. Hello Ekdalian, why are traditional accounts removed from this page? What can be done?Mikemarssss (talk) 15:39, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Ok.Thanks Ekdalian. Mikemarssss (talk) 08:49, 28 September 2021 (UTC) Comment left for change on Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha Page"Completely unsourced; editors active on this page are so keen to establish the Brahmin link that they have not mentioned a single line about their actual social status, which is quite high indeed." Hello, I thank you for your changes on the page. However, I didn't get what you wanted to convey through the last non-identifying relative clause of your sentence, that is, "which is quite high indeed". I will be grateful to you if you cast light on it a little here. Moreover, I request you to build the page. Your contributions will get the page stabler. Advaita2222 (talk) 16:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Mail call It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Bishonen | tålk 17:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC).
Gaming the systemHi again, Ekdalian. I have partial-blocked Sketan from Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha for gaming the autoconfirmed requirements. See my comment on their page. Bishonen | tålk 19:42, 2 October 2021 (UTC).
Pending changes reviewer granted Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages. Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. See also:
Anarchyte (talk) 11:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Rollback granted Hi Ekdalian. After reviewing your request, I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until {{{expiry}}}. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! The WordsmithTalk to me 17:38, 3 November 2021 (UTC) ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Ekdalian, I speedied Vaidyabrahmin per your A10 nomination, but then discovered that it wasn't a recently created article, so A10 does not apply. I've recreated it and turned it into a redirect to Baidya instead. Bishonen | tålk 08:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC).
OpinionWhen you get chance, can you please look at below link to provide your opinion there please? [4] MehmoodS (talk) 01:33, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Happy new era Thank you so much, Bishonen! Wishing you a truly happy & prosperous new year. Ekdalian (talk) 16:06, 31 December 2021 (UTC) Help needed for recent changes in Charan pageHi. The user: RegentsPark has advised me to ask for your help. See the last discussion on his talk page under title: "About recent changes on Charan page" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RegentsPark The issue is regarding the proper usage of verses of mythological texts like Ramayana & Mahabharata. I have written & tried to provide explanation on the talk page of RegentsPark. Please see the discussion. I hope you agree to help me on this issue. Thank you. Happy New Year. Krayon95 (talk) 19:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Regarding BrahminHi, Why did you revert my removal. It is just his imagination. It is evident that Chanakya born in 375 BC. How do you justify this. He is against Hindu and part of Anti-Hindu group. How can we take his book as reference. Please go through best research book The Human Record: Sources of Global History, Volume I: To 1500 (this says about Brahmins during 700 BC), i also have many references. These things cannot be concluded like this. So, we should remove it. Moreover he is a Periar follower, Anti-Hindu, and Anti-Brahmin. He wrote many things like this in his books.- MRRaja001 (talk) 07:53, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Need help on Jaiswal (surname)A user Swapnil1101 constantly adding spams or poorly sourced content at Jaiswal (surname), with a single objective of glorifying caste. As per WP:RS, India TV, The Times of India, Dainik Bhaskar, Navbharat times and matrimonial sites (jeevansathi.com) are not considered reliable for history/caste related details. But the user Swapnil1101 kept on adding these sources which was already removed by me and one administrator. Also the user directly added level 3 warning on my talk page for a single revert. As you are a senior editor and I have seen your contributions in South Asian history. Your input would be highly appreciable in this article. Thanks and regards. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 11:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
HelloHi,I pinged you at sadgop talk page but you didn't respond.Please help me to find the source is WP:RS or not.opinion from an admin can also be helpful.thanks. Nobita456 (talk) 08:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments,I just wanted to know is the source Mitra is reliable or not?? Nobita456 (talk) 13:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC) Recent edits on Charan pageHi, User: Ekdalian. Thank you for the correction regarding recent edits on the Charan page. It would be great if we can discuss beforehand if you have some issues or concerns about any changes. Since you are not familiar(assuming) with this social group, I understand if you find something strange in the article as I would be glad to explain those changes or help with the citations & sources. And I did add the term 'pastoralist' since it seemed important as you highlighted it yourself. Thanks.Krayon95 (talk) 12:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC) Vandalism by Nobita456Dear @Ekdalian, I thank you so much for all your contributions to all those pages. I am sure that there are many more people grateful to you for all your wonderful contributions. I have always had great deference for you. I want to bring your attention to some of the recent edits made by a user named Nobita456; the edits plausibly are with a view to maligning the caste status of a single caste as the user belong to another caste from the same region. I request you to bring admin attention to this edit-warring as well, if possible. I have been indebted to you for all your wonderful work so far. May peace and bliss be your abode forever! Advaita2222 (talk) 20:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
About Ghosal SurnameAll my forefathers surname was ghosal as far i know.They all are belong to Namasudra Community. How much you want to see Namasudra Ghosal.If you are in doubt, come to my area... I have never said that the title Ghosal does not belong to Brahmin...Roy,Majumder,Halder,Bagchi,,, all those surname is among the Brahmins...But lower caste people also use those surname.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghosal11 (talk • contribs) 12:06, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
GuptaHi, it is regarding this edit. There is no URL so can't verify. Is this OK? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:11, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Das articleHi, it is regarding this edit. Here atleast, the IP expaliend in the edit summary that Das are used by other communities of Bengal. Obviously, it doesn't warrant removal of the word Bengal from it, can you find RS sources that says the surname is used by Kayasthas of Bengal. I was unable to find any. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:08, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Suvarna BanikHi there, Ekdalian, hope you're doing well. The article Suvarna Banik may contain original research. Would you mind having a look. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 20:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
I believe you might like to see these changes [5] that are largely unsourced with a POV, also these poor edits. - 117.201.115.163 (talk) 11:16, 24 September 2022 (UTC) A Barnstar for you!
Thank you so much, Dr.Pinsky! Stay blessed. Ekdalian (talk) 17:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC) TeliSir, I had already informed you about the sourced content but again you revert the information which i shared before , i belong to this caste and know much more then anyone else about this subject, i didn't make much changes but only add some incomplete information about the topic which i get though reading books. Again i want to say that you are senior and experienced editor , im giving you proper respect but thrust me I want to share only relevant information with our users — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishvesh Rathore (talk • contribs) 17:06, 27 April 2022 (UTC) TeliSir, I had already informed you about the source and i have much more information about the subject if you want, i belong to this caste and have sufficient information about it. I don't know why you are in favour of spreading fake and incomplete information , if somebody want to share something and shared you information about the subject so atleast you can thrust on him/her. You are senior then me,you can guide me about the editing since im rookie in it but im in favour of spreading right and complete information. Vishvesh Rathore (talk) 17:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Karana-Kayastha connectionThis is to inform you that a discussion regarding the Karana-Kayastha connection is going on in WP:DRN. You are requested to express your concerns here. Thanks. Regards, Satnam2408 (talk) 15:22, 24 June 2022 (UTC) Please check thisA recent change was made here. Since you have edited the article before, I think you should see this. 117.201.113.99 (talk) 16:54, 25 November 2022 (UTC) ArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Happy new eraThank you so much! Wishing you a very happy & prosperous new year, Bishzilla! Ekdalian (talk) 17:39, 1 January 2023 (UTC) Happy New YearWishing you a year filled with prosperity, happiness, and good health. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 12:21, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Teli[6], I thought you might be interested. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 18:41, 5 January 2023 (UTC) Happy New Year Happy New Year! Hello Ekdalian: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a great New Year! Cheers, LukeEmily (talk) 19:12, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
LukeEmily (talk) 19:12, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Recent Edit on Khandayat pageHi, You reverted all edits in Khandayat page without giving any solid reason. All the information are backed with reliable sources. You're free to examine the sources and change the edits as per Wikipedia guidelines. Sitush didn't revert any of my edits because all info are backed by legit sources. My revert was based on the edits of a suck-puppet Id Blissfulbeing. Can you please take a look on your actions ? Peacepks (talk) 12:17, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Your recent revert on page AroraHi there. It seems there is undue weightage on Arya Samaj and its beliefs on the page since the page is not about Arya Samaj. Also, the long paragraph, followed by the quote, is from one source only. For these reasons, can you please reconsider your revert on the page? Many thanks. Nirmohiji (talk) 15:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Early reference section on Rajput articleAlthough sources seems reliable, but I don't think the various reference to word "Rajputra" in early texts is in reference to Rajput caste. It was a title used in different ancient kingdoms and i think Dympies has collected all that stuff together to link it with Rajput people. Tagging LukeEmily. Admantine123 (talk) 16:56, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Dispute resolution regarding Vedic analysis of Vaidyas being BrahminsDispute resolution started. Anybody interested can follow. Anirban Kolkata (talk) 09:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Have a lookHave a look at this change. Is it sourced? I'm unable to verify it. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Shasan and gotra of BrahminsGaur(shasan) is a upper identity of north West Indian brahmins but our original gotra is from brahmin Rishis .vasishtha, bhardwaj, atri,kaushik,shandilya brahmarishis etc. are our surnames! The original gotra of Indian brahmins is from Rishi! gaur, trivedi, tivari, shukla, sarswat, iyer, iyenger etc. this is just a top identity but their origin root identity is brahman rishi' gotra 103.206.177.82 (talk) 10:16, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Nobita created another sock to post to my talk page,Now reverted and blocked. Doug Weller talk 17:38, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Sundhi@Ekdalian Sir, you are senior than me but it doesn't mean that you can just ignore the fact and the reality.. because of you people's our society is getting misleading.. when you don't have proper knowledge... then you should atleast have a proper research on that.... Listen sir I belong to this caste only if you want proof than i can provide you with my caste certificate also, which is directly made by government... Sir a caste never be Dalit and OBC at same time. then I can provide you with government Sources where it is clearly mentioned that Sundhi caste is a Sub caste of Bania... I can give you best clearly in it... You can't even say sundhi as dalit... it is proper vaishya caste according to government. I don't think that you are from India or here that's why you don't know about caste system of india and dalits. It's my request PLEASE DON'T MISGUIDE the peoples have a proper clearly and research. Raj Hanse (talk) 04:23, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delitionSince you are here for past ten years, i believe you possess much better knowledge than me about wiki policies. Do you think articles like those in this category Category:Unsolved murders in India fulfill the criteria for Speedy delition? Unsolved murder related articles are a notable topic for Wikipedia. Is it fair to call them an attack page, because the accused is a living person. I never read anything in any policy.-Admantine123 (talk) 12:13, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
AFDsHello, Ekdalian, I've noticed in some of your comments in deletion discussions, you say "seems to", like "seems to meet GNG" or "seems notable". These comemnts say to me as I'm closing a discussion that you don't really know and you don't have a strong opinion on what happens. So, it's kind of like saying nothing at all. I'd like to encourage you to really investigate the sources in an article under discussion and take a position without qualification. It you truly believe a particular source establishes GNG for an article subject state that. Don't hedge your bets. If you think notability isn't evident, then argue for that position. Same goes for Redirect, Merge or Draftify opinions. Deletion discussions are about presenting arguments for particular outcomes based on the quality of the sources and your own knowledge of Wikipedia policy. So, be more confident in that knowledge or skip that discussion and look at a different AFD where you might have a stronger sense of what should happen. Thank you though for participating in AFDs, we have a definite shortage of editors willing to put in the time to review articles and your involvement is appreciated. Liz Read! Talk! 03:44, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
If you are interestedList of Brahmins is using many WP:SPS and dubious website to determine the caste of a person, which are definitely not WP:RS. An example is this [7]. In past Sitush has removed some entries and now i removed others. In case you get time, you may assist us in clean-up. Admantine123 (talk) 18:07, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
BaranHi, it is regarding these edits, most of the sources are unrelaible and surname list unsourced, the Rajastahn part is sourced but outside the scope of the article, hence have to be removed. This is likely a sockpuppet. I've started an SPI case here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:19, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Ambastha KayasthaHey Ekdalian Sir, I noticed that you reverted my edit made on the article Ambastha Kayasthas. I would like to ask that why did you revert that edit as the article Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha clearly states that Ambashtha Kayastha is obviously upper caste. I would also like to request you that please don't do disruption to any edits for no reason made by fellow editors, specially the valid edits. Thanks {:-) TheProEditor11 (talk) 15:06, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Ambastha KayasthaHey Ekdalian, Since you are an experienced editor here, I need a help from you regarding the article Ambastha. Actually, Ambastha Kayasthas follow a system of Khas Ghar which is the Gharana of any person belonging from the Ambastha sub-caste of Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha (Some Gharanas are - Chargave, Pachgave, Daraad, Jamuar, Okhandiar, Rukhaiyar etc). The concern is that the abovementioned thing is correct but I cannot find a good source of the same. Can you please help me to find the source and edit the same? TheProEditor11 (talk) 12:15, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Recent socksGlad they were caught. The only good thing is that I found that we are using Booksclinic, which brags about being India's biggest self-publishing house, as a source. I've deleted some but not all. I really came here about this editor[8] who seems to have been created solely to revert the socks. Strange. [9] has made a real mess. You probably haven't run across them but I don't know if I can fix it all. I've contacted some others to help also. Doug Weller talk 08:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Doug Weller, I hate socks as well! User Aditya Prakash-080 seems to be a sock of Rakesh Kumar Vats, both accounts trying to promote Bhumihar caste, active on the article talk page since the article is protected! Please have a look at this edit where one is rectifying the typo by the other user! User page of Rakesh Kumar Vats has been used to promote/glorify the caste as well. Regards. Ekdalian (talk) 07:14, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Gramanya TalkpageIt came as a total shock to me that I had reverted your content.I have never deleted talkpage content for any articles so it is baffling. I could only think of carelessness on my part or somebody may have hacked my account. I hope it is probably the former. My apologies.Regards.Jonathansammy (talk) 18:00, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Invitation
Sent by NPP Coordination using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC) Happy New Year(2024)Hey, Ekdalian, I wish you a happy and prosperous New Year. May the year bring you and your loved ones good fortune, health, wealth, and success. Thank you. — Satnam2408(talk) 12:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
RE: your reversion on Saraswat BrahminHello fellow traveller. I logged on to see that you reverted my edit to Saraswat Brahmin and I am curious, mainly with regards to some of the terminology you used. The edit in question:
I am wondering if you could explain to me what "caste promotion" means in this context. To be clear, I am not trying to contest your reversion, I just realized that the request came from a probable sock (see:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joshi punekar), this is coming from a place of personal curiosity. Thanks.— FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 14:31, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
About Potter pageI presented you a government document as a reference, yet you undone the article, which is worth considering. Don't make me think that you are negative about the reputation of the world's oldest community Kumhar. May I know the reason for your undo?Whereas this government document is valid in Hindi Wikipedia. Please give up narrow mindedness and respond wisely. दीपसिंह 08:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Caste warriorThis person has defied a level-4 warning for vandalism [10]. The next step would be to report them at WP:AIV. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:34, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Can you have a lookIt seems the content you had removed [12] has been reintroduced, thanks!Ratnahastin (talk) 16:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Regarding a POV userHi Ekdalian, could you please look at this user contributes, he is editing using multiple non RS sources in various articles. Timovinga (talk) 04:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Regarding article edithey ekdalian! recently, I saw a article, Jats. I belongs to Jat Community and from Godara Clan. I would be happy if you add Godara Clan in the list of clans section.I am providing you the sources for verification. 1. https://www.jatland.com/home/Godara 2. https://www.quora.com/Who-are-Godaras have a good day. Albertx07 (talk) 07:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
SockThanks for this. The IP is most definitely a sock of this sockfarm and the other one whom you reverted may also be same but an SPI by me a few years ago wasn't conclusive. May be a different guy, but the agenda is same, initially pushed by the sockfarm. Anyway the lists should follow the order laid out in the source or should be alphabetical per MOS:LISTORG. Nowhere I've seen a policy to add the supposed indigenous one before. In a country where Standard Hindi is the official in many states, where it is not the native tongue, such arguments by the IP only demonstrates the POV. So yes, your reversion is correct. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Someone removed Kayastha this. I can't verify the sources. Please see. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Have you seen[15]. found them from the talk page post there about HIDDEN JAT HISTORY by [16] Doug Weller talk 08:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
JangidHi ! @Ekdalian , please check this article. I opened every source which is present in this article and none of them mentioned what is written in this. Even 2nd & 3rd paragraphs are without source. I tried to revert the edits by adding the information present in the current sources but again another user reverted by edits. Kindly please check this and go through the sources. This one is my edit which was reverted according to the sources. Stoickik (talk) 08:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Tili CasteHi @Ekdalian, I cited sources in all the famous people list and the wikipedia article about ili is totally wrong.first of all the heading is wrong.Tilis are not agragrian ,tilis are a rich trading caste..I added well sourced contents to the famous people list of Tili...you edited out all why?...do you hate tilis?...Tilis are an upper caste...do you have any problem with the tili caste?...In bardhaman parikrama it is mentioned that "Tilis were the only caste those who used to avoid agriculture"...Tilis have the first national cricket captain from bengal eka pankaj roy,richest person of bengal of all time-sahara-subrata roy,first national football team captain-gostho pal,tili..tilis had a lot famous zamindaars..do you have any problem with tilis?...infact tilis have strong claim on the pala empire......although in real life tilis are powerful..I think some peoples are letting their frstration out on tili by writing false statements about Tili....but in real life ,tilis are always an upper caste..atul sur also mentioned tilis as an indo-european caste.I don't know why you always try to delete all the positive information about tili..you are just a senior member...I hope you will understand your fault..........I am a student from NIT......I swear,I shall own wikipedia one day....and I shall remove all the articles which spreads wrong info about tili and the peoples who spreads will be blocked...but maybe it is a fairy dream..I don't understand your problem with the tili caste -...I am adding siddhanta samudra..I hope after reading this relible source your way of thinking will be changed.. https://eap.bl.uk/archive-file/EAP341-1-1033# page 41 to 68...in british time peoples tried to degrade the domination of the tili caste...in social hiererchy tilis sand just below brahmin..and tilis are found only in bardhaman and tilis migrated from bardhaman to other places...the spelling is tili or tilly...not tilli.........there are three castes Til-Chasi/Tilli,Tili/Tili and Teli...but all is mixed up...I don't know if you have any problem with the tilis...tilis have a less population and an educated caste...tilis are compareble to khatris of punjab...althogh in real life nobody can beat tili...in reel life I ee some silly guys spreading wrong infos about Tili in order to show themselves higher 2409:40E1:0:E506:3CD0:1CAD:E9F0:FB64 (talk) 15:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
You've got mailIt may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Doug Weller talk 19:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC) Needs cleanuphello @Ekdalian, please look at Ahir clans, Gwalavanshi and Dhadhor. Please remove unreliable raj era sourced information. 2409:4085:8D10:961F:0:0:8889:DB13 (talk) 12:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC) April 2024@Ekdalian sir, please look at Chudachandra,[1][2] Graharipu, samma tribe,[3][4][5] Mandalika I & Navaghana (late 11th century king). 2409:4085:8C9D:9FF0:0:0:8109:4A0D (talk) 05:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
SPI?Hi, Ekdalian. Where's the SPI you mention at User talk:Twinkle here? (Your link there is not good.) Does it exist yet? Bishonen | tålk 08:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC).
Teli related groupsHi, Ekdalian I'm writing to you as you are the last credible person edited teli article. The related groups mentioned kandu and sundhi are without citations and In reality also they are not at all related to teli caste . Teli is usually consideredas as a vaishya subcaste or baniya subcaste and I'm linking news report of indian government denying teli EBC reservations because on historical and survey basis they found that teli is an influential vaishya caste. Here's the link to the Times of India news report https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/bid-to-make-teli-an-ebc-opposed/articleshow/4577067.cms Shataksingh (talk) 20:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Biswas surname relatedHi Ekdalian, Thank you for attempting to verify the source. The link for the paper by Mookerjee is functional. I encountered the same issue regarding this paper. Please try accessing it on weekdays. I have successfully downloaded the paper. If you're unable to access it, I can share it with you. CategoryHi ! Ekdalian , I want to add this page in agricultural communities of India. But when I edit category page there is no option to write.My source for this is the book by SP Shukla : India's freedom struggle and the role of Haryana page no 28. You can also verify this by using this link. Thugguy (talk) 11:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC) Biswas surname relatedHi Ekdalian, I don't know if you had a chance to download the paper by Mookerjee S (1959), titled 'Bengalee Surnames' (PDF), from the link provided on Wikipedia to verify my edits. I am providing another link for verification: https://www.scribd.com/document/391633814/NAME-LIST. On page 82 of this paper, there is a paragraph about 'Biswas'. I quoted from that paragraph in my edit. Kartik PaliwalCan you help me Create a Kartik Paliwal page Psmmedia14 (talk) 08:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Amartya SenHi, it was removed by me for the lack of self-identification here initially. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Ekdalian, thanks for defending the article. IP /64 range blocked. And yes, I suppose I'll also protect the article if there's more caste promotion. But let's hope the rangeblock is enough. Bishonen | tålk 18:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC).
You've got mailIt may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Doug Weller talk 12:43, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 13 AugHi, a user is declaring Vrishnis as Gadaria and Surasena Kingdom as Abhira. Please review these pages NorthSiderRock (talk) 03:22, 13 August 2024 (UTC) IP sockObvious case of socking [17] [18] by IPs socks of this user. Case page here. That other guy is also a sock, so are other IPs before them. Thanks for the revert. Please keep and eye. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Vandalismthis user@Cyberpunk indicus has done vandalism Karan (caste) can you undo it ? Ranchosen (talk) 19:48, 24 September 2024 (UTC) You've got mailIt may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Admantine123 (talk) 00:41, 1 October 2024 (UTC) section blankingsHi @Fylindfotberserk and Ekdalian:, Trust you both are doing well. I am a bit concerned that these edits by a user who joined in late 2023 are resulting in blanking large sections across wikipedia - some of which are sourced. Some editors have reverted his edits - such as this but I suspect there may be more. Thanks, LukeEmily (talk) 18:51, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
pingsHi Ekdalian, Sorry I have been in and out for the last few months. I know you might have pinged me a few times in the last few weeks/months and I might have not responded in a timely manner. Please let me know if you want me take a look at any page. I will have more time for the rest of the year. Also, if you ping me please use "ping|username" instead of "u|username" as the latter does not seem to notify me (seems like a bug or some setting associated with my account). Or feel free to drop a message on my talk page if I do not respond in a reasonable time. Thanks, LukeEmily (talk) 18:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Also, why did ratnahastin not object to the absurd rajputra addition that both sitush and admin objected to?LukeEmily (talk) 09:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Hey ekdalian. I hope you're doing well. I need your help with the Sri Lankan vellalar article. That article has many misinterpreted and misleading edits that imply that Sri Lankan Pallar (Considered untouchables in history) and Sri Lankan Vellalar (considered Hindu caste) are the same. I have tagged you on the talk page for more details. Please look into this matter. 2409:40F4:200D:7C2B:BCDF:CF94:7E25:E27 (talk) 16:40, 21 October 2024 (UTC) Veerashaivauser:PerspicazHistorian he is continuing to push mythology as history ,your revert is also undid by him, Veerashaiva and Lingayatism is same, Panchacharyas are not existed before 20th century, the siddhata shikamani, myth is busted by researchers, siddanta shikamani mentions only Renukaradya, their is no panchacharyas before 20th century, RI talk 10:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ahir clansplease check ahir clan article, sourced valid academic sources are being removed Thanks Drisha herjee (talk) 05:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC) Tili (caste) protection request followupHey. To follow up on your reply, that would make it WP:PREEMPTIVE. The protection level should match the actual user rights of disruptive accounts, not potential ones — unless ECP is expressly mentioned as a base-level protection, like in WP:GS/AA, WP:RUSUKR and so on. But if the issue is that prevalent in the caste topic area (which it may well be), it might be worthwhile to try to update its corresponding WP:CASTE sanctions regime to say that. Because at present it makes no mention of it. Thank you. El_C 01:51, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Yaduvanshi Ahir clanHello @Ekdalian please see ,[20], [21], [22] [23]. 2409:4085:9D0B:BB30:0:0:8189:EF0D (talk) 08:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC) SeePlease review PerspicazHistorian's creation and recent edits on caste articles. Thanks. - Ratnahastin (talk) 10:50, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Caste promotion on wiki pagesHey admin, there is a user User:Drisha herjee who is again and again causing vandalism to the wiki article ‘Ahir clans’ by removing the well sourced information and adding information based on unreliable sources. We can clearly see the caste promotion this user is trying to do please ask this user not to do so and add the genuine information only if truly wants to contribute. HistorianAlferedo (talk) 04:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Pov pushAdmin have a look at page ‘Ahir clans’ what User:Drisha herjee did there. Removed a large part of well cited information of the Dauwa clan calling it as British raj source but that’s actually not so. Please intervine. Thank you HistorianAlferedo (talk) 19:09, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Ekdalian please stop the user HistorianAlferedo from vandalising the ahir clan page,sources provided by him are raj era sources and are unreliable, please check yourself and let a neutral editor make edits... at present there is a great attempt to perform rajput caste POV and glorification. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drisha herjee (talk • contribs) 07:53, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Pant SurnameHello, I saw that you remove Uttrakhand and Maharashtra references from the page.I am also a native of the region and a historian, so I am well-versed in the origins and history. I recommend referring to Kumaon Ka Itihas for more details. Many notable individuals, like Pt. Govind Ballabh Pant (former Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh), were from Uttarakhand. It's important to note that not all information is available everywhere. Wikipedia is a reliable source of information, and removing the truth based on one person's opinion will harm its credibility. Kumaon Ka Itihas book talks about Pant's migration from Maharashtra to Uttrakhand and Nepal around 700 years ago. We all are in a mission for accurate info to be published on Wikipedia. Happy to get your feedback. Also I am unsure sometime why my ip is only showing instead of used name. I am a contributor since year 2007. Best Anni_in Anni in (talk) 15:58, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy Holidays!.jpg) .jpg)   Hello Ekdalian: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:45, 23 December 2024 (UTC) ,_cropped.jpg) Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:45, 23 December 2024 (UTC) Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
Merry Christmas from the Bishonen conglomerate!
Happy holidays!
Happy HolidaysHello Ekdalian: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 13:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC) Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message Abishe (talk) 13:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC) Happy Holidays
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
