User talk:Aaroncrick/Archive 6

Building collaborative teams?

Hi Aaron. It would be better if you can build links with other editors interested in this kind of topic, to prepare this and future nominations. That way, you can get a wide skill-base to work on an article. This may help. I'd rather spend a small amount of time on more FACs, given the shortage of reviewers. Please let me know when it's ready to look at again. Tony (talk) 05:47, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chef

I didn't want to repeat myself which may have led to the confusion. Basically it's: he played for Essex Academy until 2003 when he was called up to the Essex first XI. I've always taken it for granted that first XI refers to a main team while the Academy is a second XI of sorts but maybe that isn't clear. This is why I find it hard to edit my own work, I always know what I mean but sometimes only I do. Tony2Times (talk) 23:27, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. Just wanted clarification as I was just reading through the article. Aaroncrick (talk) 09:19, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sheffield FAR

Could you update your "!vote"? Marskell is preparing to close it. DrKiernan (talk) 09:08, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Aaroncrick (talk) 09:18, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hassett in 48

Good ol OR canard again YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 03:11, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some just don't give in. Aaroncrick (talk) 04:35, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vijender

Hey aaron, sorry was on leave the last few days. Thanks for ce the article. You are right, those parts are not clear and the lead looks a little fancrufty. I'll do an independent ce again and eliminate it. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 03:19, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have some other queries to ask you when you're done. Aaroncrick (talk) 04:37, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shoot em. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:52, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The job was taken up after winning the olympic medal and coming back to India. However, as is seen, this is more of a side-job that is not taken seriously. His main earnings continue to come through the trophy wins and endorsements. I'll try to re-phrase the other concern that you raised. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:07, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ya I know. GA is pretty overloaded at this moment. Im still waiting for the "4 Minutes" FA to close. Wonder what's up with that. Its been a month already. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:15, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Will take a looky :) --Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:03, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know. That's why Im taking it slow and steady. I will submit taht article for atleast 2 PRs then only proceed for FA. Im sure it has to go through atleast 5 FACs brfore it is promoted. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 08:57, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Outdent)::Hope so. Before that I'll push for "Give It 2 Me" and "Miles Away" for FA. Today or tomorrow first thing, I'll get around York Park somehow. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:09, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I somehow survive multi-tasking. During the Madonna articles I used to develop 5-6 articles in 2 days and submit them for GA. That's how so many Madonna articles are GA now within the last two months. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:18, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Launceston article

Aaroncrick, thanks for your note about my changes to the Launceston article: it's nice to know that someone notices these things. My changes were very minor indeed — small copy editing changes — but I hope they make that little section clearer. Ondewelle (talk) 09:47, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The tram image is as far as I know dated incorrectly. Instead of being 1920 I'm pretty sure it is a photo taken on opening day of the tram system - early August 1911. Will try and confirm by checking other resources.

RossRSmith (talk) 10:33, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for checking it out. I'm not sure as I didn't put the image in the article and the Tasmanian library doesn't always use dates for its images. Aaroncrick (talk) 10:43, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey mate, I STUFFED UP BAD I NEED HELP!!!

Hey I was just editting about all the trades in the annual AFL trade week but I did something wrong trying to change Sydney swans new recruit Josh Kennedy and stuffed his profile up, I wasn't logged in at the time, It says he played 16 games for the swans... I stuffed up the info box basicly

PLEASE help me out I might get booted from the AFL team .....

heres the link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josh_P._Kennedy

--Sydney Swans09 (talk) 11:53, 8 October 2009 (UTC) thanks[reply]

Sorry to stick my nose in but saw the section header pop up on my watch list. Infoboxes, templates, and formatting can be a pain and mistake shappen. I'm sure it will be an easy fix for someone a little more familiar with it. Don't stress out about it too much, Sydney Swans. I did a quick fix with some notes in the edit summary.Cptnono (talk) 13:15, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine now? Aaroncrick (talk) 20:47, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Federer Fan site!

This site is credible and reliable because it keeps track of his career for years and in objective details from the early 2000's.BLUE_DOG^TN 22:40, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We'll deal with that when we get to that bridge. If it is not included then, then it is not? I think if we have another tennis player like Andy Murray with a fan site link it should go for Federer, which this is the best and accurate.BLUE_DOG^TN 22:46, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I got rid of it, too.BLUE_DOG

Qwest Field

First on archive 6! No problem. Let me know if you have any thoughts on the infobox image.Cptnono (talk) 00:02, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Aaroncrick. It looked like York Park was doing well but didn't go through! It shouldn't be that far away from an FA so best of luck.Cptnono (talk) 05:11, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know it worked that way. I thought the FAC person came in and did their thing. The only tyhing I saw was "Northern Stand after fire damage" bleeding into the next seciton when viewing with Opera (I'm going to move it up to the fire section to see if it fits). Besides all of the requested changes were talken care of and I certainly would have supported.Cptnono (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming it gets nominated again and stays the same (or is better) I would be happy to go through it and suggest any quick changes. From going through it, I would "support" as is.Cptnono (talk)

Quick

What was .. ^ ? --Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:07, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also at York Park I think you need to collapse the attendance table here if you don't want the flow to break. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:08, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. Told ya that I can develop a numebr of articles like maniac, if I get into the flow. I need to take up some reviews also, else the GAN will be flooded by my nominations again!! :) --Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:13, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Next stop, the Confessions Tour baby!! --Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of India women Test cricketers/archive1

I've answered your comment, let me know if you feel strongly about this, I can just as easily add another column. Currently, there appears to be no standard way to address half-centuries in lists. cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 14:47, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Can you revisit the page and add any further comments? I've added a column for 50s. cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 16:23, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you also visit Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of India women ODI cricketers/archive1? cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 04:57, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just caught a few transcription errors in the above list and fixed them, makes me feel like an ass. Since you already commented on the FLC, I thought I should let you know. cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 19:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1930 tour

Book landed in the library YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 05:23, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great :) Aaroncrick (talk) 07:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did I forget to thank you? ..

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed nearly unanimously with 174 in support, 2 in opposition and 1 neutral votes. Special thanks goes to RegentsPark, Samir and John Carter for their kind nomination and support. I am truly honored by the trust and confidence that the community has placed in me. I thank you for your kind inputs and I will be sincerely looking at the reasons that people opposed me so I can improve in those areas ( including my english ;) ). If you ever need anything please feel free to ask me and I would be happy to help you :). Have a great day ! -- Tinu Cherian - 10:00, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck. :) Aaroncrick (talk) 08:58, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hellooo

Just thought of pinging and asking how have you been. :) --Legolas ^(talk2me) 11:52, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to hear from you too. Its been pretty boring here with me continuously developing articles on Madonna's tours. Before EOD I hope to nominate Re-Invention World Tour. By the way, would you like to work on Sourav Ganguly to take it to GA? :) --Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The cricket part is something that you will know better, Im quite at a loss there. I will be able to contribute on the main structure as a biography and integration of personal life as a part of it. As I can see that article alongwith Ishant Sharma is quite fancrufty. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:54, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. I watched both the opening ceremony and the first match at Bangalore. Came home at 2 am. Brrrr. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 11:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Adelaide

Yeah, I know. That's why I didn't warn them. :) Pinkadelica^♣ 10:07, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Halloween!

File:Halloween Hush Puppies.jpg

Photograph of my Halloween-themed Hush Puppies plush basset hounds in my bedroom.

As Halloween is my favorite holiday, I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to give me a barnstar or smile at me, supportive enough to agree with me, etc., a Happy Halloween! Sincerely, --A Nobody^My talk 01:16, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recent changes!

Thanks for your recent edits!! - You helped the world today in some way... maybe a little bit, but wrong is doing nothing at all. 189.217.171.135 (talk) 01:52, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Paine

ARe you going to fatten it up? Luckily it isn't likely to be reviewed any time soon... YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 02:17, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gaga GT

He he. Lemme get Madonna's Confessions era to GT, then its off to Ganguly for sure. I hope I can create a new direction for musical tour articles with the Confessions Tour so that future editors can consider it as a perfect muse on how to construct musical tour articles. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:41, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personal life in Ganguly? I never support any section called personal life in any bio. I always model any such articles according to articles like Madonna, Janet Jackson etc because I believe that notability of their personal life is a bit WP:UNDUE and sometimes tends to be a target for fancruft and blogging. Hence I prefer making it a part of the main biography. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:49, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Though I know him quite well but if we can't find sources for those stuff were fungati!!! But lemme try and make a draft in my sandbox. Then again, just waiting for the Confessions thing to go to GT. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:56, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

St Kilda templates/infoboxes

I have no issue with nominating most of those templates for deletion, but I'm still hoping Brian will show that he understands and accepts consensus, or at least, is willing to negotiate. Otherwise we're forever going to be trailing around behind him and nominating his St Kilda-related decorations for deletion. That would be a pity, because if he focused on improving the content of the articles instead, he could do for St Kilda what Boomtish (and others) have done for Geelong. Somno (talk) 08:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK Ricky Ponting with the Australian cricket team in India in 2008-09

Thanks for congratulations and a comment on my talk. Regarding this DYK nomination, we'll need your response at the T:TDYK page. Materialscientist (talk) 23:23, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Under every DYK hook we keep a thread of review-reply questions, like a GAR. Most questions should be answered there (otherwise the review stalls). If discussion gets too broad and technical, it can be continued or held in parallel at various talk pages. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 23:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Aaroncrick. You have new messages at Dabomb87's talk page.
Message added 00:56, 7 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Dabomb87 (talk) 00:56, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ricky Ponting with the Australian cricket team in India in 2008–09

On November 8, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ricky Ponting with the Australian cricket team in India in 2008–09, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:15, 8 November 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Harley

Please refrain from adding incorrect details????? I could say the same thing about you. I criticized you because you gave me a warning for no reason. Tom Harley played 197 games for Geelong. Do some research and you will find i am correct. And then you can ask your friends where did they get their information from! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oz Juice24 (talk • contribs) 04:52, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. Sorry my fault. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 05:08, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for the apology. I got a bit hot under the collar because i could not work out why i got the warning. I have been a long time reader of wikipedia, and when i saw that error i thought i would have a try at fixing it. I suppose not having a user name made it look abit like vandalism which i am sure you encounter frequently. Anyway thanks as well for the tips, and GO THE MIGHTY HAWKS. Oz Juice24 (talk) 05:31, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia help

You said that on the IP address i am using there were previous warnings for disruptive behaviour. I noticed that too this morning, but i have never edited a story before. Do you know how this could of happened, and should i be concerned of this? Thankyou Oz Juice24 (talk) 05:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I use a work computer, and i am the only user on this computer, i checked with IT to see if we all had the same IP address, and he said we have different IP address numbers

Roosters

Unencyc, again YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 05:52, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know. Imagine if every half known individual listed their preferred IPL Team. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 05:56, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Qwest Field FAC

If you are talking about Qwest Field I have commented at the FAC since the most recent edit to the article.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:4-2

Im fine.... and I know 4-2!!! Kinda busy with this. Taking an extra day than I would like it to be :( --Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:51, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He he.. bless you my dear! Would love to be the 100 FA user :) --Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:07, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nah.. not soon. Though the Great Flood is coming but alongwith Im getting an urge to review articles again, so hopefully the flood should go down the drains. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 03:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

South Park

Nah, it's not correct. For years, editors have been claiming that South Park is a real town, but have not been able to provide any evidence. You would think that the existence of a town would be easy to prove through secondary sources. Thanks for pointing out the edit. While the claim that it's a real town is incorrect, the portion about the town on the show being based on an specific area of Colorado is already mentioned in the main article body, and doesn't really need to be mentioned in the lead. I went ahead and removed it And thanks! :) - SoSaysChappy (talk) 14:51, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...and thanks for removing this weird, mysterious foreign jibberyjoo from my talk page. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 04:42, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nash

I hope to get to the library this weekend for more research on Nash so perhaps it's for the best that no one has reviewed it yet. --Roisterer (talk) 09:28, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Slater dyk

Hi, someone has suggested that I came over rather brusque in rejecting this article as not expanded enough. I didn't mean to be bitey, but maybe I should have spotted that you are a veteran of GA/FA and just said that was the route to go rather than putting thingsd the way I did.--Peter cohen (talk) 13:07, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm still learnign it too.--Peter cohen (talk) 19:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hass

Fattened up a bit more YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 04:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Imeant the fixes YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 04:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paine

High up hte list now YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 05:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep I know. Could still be a month away .. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 05:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

City of Clarence

Can you do a GA review on City of Clarence for me, and I will try to fill in any gaps to get it up to GA status... 42° South (talk) 14:01, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Barnstar

Thank you very much! Came as a bit of a surprise to me, I'll admit. It's nice to see that someone is paying some attention, I do worry sometimes that with women's cricket being pretty low key, that I'm creating articles that will never get read again, but there we go! Harrias (talk) 10:18, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

YES!

Madonna albums discography passed the FL nomination at its first attempt!! I'm so close towards my goal now! --Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So what are you working on nowadays? --Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:11, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hithe swing is logn enough at the mo so i woz able to throw my bit in - but will probably be completely offline for about 5 to 6 weeks so anything then - wont be around to do stuff - trust all is well - cheers and thanks - and please try gmail for the next week or so - cheers SatuSuro 06:35, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

That's okay, Aaron. I was leaving a general message for admins, just in case this twit decides to cause trouble. AFL-Cool 10:20, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Name calling? I just reviewed what I said and I didn't see any name calling. No offence. I know you're only trying to help. AFL-Cool 10:29, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Twit", not to worry anyhow. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 10:38, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I thought you meant on his talk page! No prob. AFL-Cool 11:19, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar thanks!

Thank you very much for your kind award of a Barnstar! Very appreciated. You do also have a point. As you may have noticed I have a bit of an attention-span problem and get bored/distracted easily... It generally means I flit between writing about cricket, football, Tasmania, military history and Australian history topics a bit too much. I really should try to focus on one to completion. I do try to get back to finish them off though. ie City of Clarence, and Football Federation Tasmania etc... Will get back to City of Clarence when done with my current upgrade of the FFT article. Thanks again for the BS. 42° South (talk) 10:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Als0123345

Oh dear ... I just had a look at some of his edits. Memories of Brian have come flooding back ;). Best at first to point him to WP:MOS and try to engage him. If that fails, and assuming you've made every effort to try and discuss your concerns with him, then I believe you'd be within your right just to revert all his problem edits (unless you want to spend a couple of hours tidying them up). Users like him come and go, he will quite possibly edit this weekend before getting sick of it and never logging on again. Jevansen (talk) 11:43, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Madonna a disco

Yup, the IP edit was correct only. :) Thanks for looking anyways.. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:57, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

York Park FAC

Hi Aaroncrick. I have archived the FAC nomination for York Park due to its outstanding issues and the fact that it has been up a long time. I understand that Brianboulton has offered to do a copyedit. When he is finished, you are welcome to bring the article back to FAC, even if it is sooner than the recommended "few weeks". I suspect that at that point the article should sail through to promotion. Good luck! Karanacs (talk) 18:11, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aaroncrick, if you bring it back sooner than two weeks, be sure to add a note with Karanacs' diff [1] so that another editor doesn't remove the nom as premature. Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:55, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have copied the FAC page to here so we can continue the discussion without the pressure of time. I will continue to add comments there. Brianboulton (talk) 11:12, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Still waiting to hear if you want to go on with this. I'm willing if you are. Brianboulton (talk) 19:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck on the copy edit and resubmission of York Park. Not sure if you are fan, but Danny Green certainly did Australia proud.Cptnono (talk) 06:10, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

York Park

OK, I'm working on the FAC page here, and have clarified my outstanding queries. Please respond there, then I'll begin the final copyedit. Brianboulton (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've picked up everything left over from the FAC and am now copyediting. This will take me to about Friday (UK time) Can you clarify one thing? The plans for the new Northern Stand mention, among its other facilities, "official areas for 800". What are "official areas"? And 800 - what? Brianboulton (talk) 21:35, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WT:GAN

Was this question for me? Didn't think it was, but not sure as it's indented to my post. cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 23:25, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No and clarified. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 23:32, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]