Hello, ANE was Nordic! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 05:47, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please - your edits to talk pages are inappropriate. I can see why you might think they were ok because too often posts are left up that should have been removed. because they are just arguing about the subject of the article. Which is why when I've deleted your posts I've at times deleted the post you responded to. You're new and aren't expected to understand how we work.
Hello, I'm Rsk6400. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Sons of Confederate Veterans that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Referring to your sentence "You at least should stop pretending you do not have an extreme bias" which seemed to address the editor of the preceding comment.Rsk6400 (talk) 06:40, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I think you're misunderstanding what I had said, there was an extreme bias evident in the previous poster's comment. You seem like someone looking to wield power over others, and your own page suggests you have rather 'passionate', some might even say extreme, political perspectives, if nothing else held with the dedication of an extremist. I wont take you seriously because you present as though you are 'out to get' other users, which is totally unacceptable. Thanks for listening and adjusting your behavior accordingly. ANE was Nordic (talk) 13:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
History and many events, people, cultures, etc. today, feature many racist people, customs, cultural attitudes, etc. you do not have to be racist, like racists, or like racism to present an unbiased view of racists and racism. You have an obligation to be impartial and present non-biased facts. You do not combat hateful lies with loving lies. You combat lies, of any form, with facts.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
None of the numerous modifications I have made were disruptive or damaging. All of my posts on 'talk' pages were in defense of the integrity of information and in pointing out user bias influencing unwarranted changes or the addition of bias into an otherwise neutral informative format. Doug Weller has unjustly blocked me because it personally does not like me for my distaste of bias in the topics I am interested in. I am clearly and obviously here to build an encyclopedia as my actions have shown. My edits being correction of poor grammar and my 'talk' contributions being in defense of integrity. This block is entirely unwarranted and Doug has some personal hangup that should have disqualified them from holding the position they hold long ago. This is apparent especially to Doug and I know I will not be unblocked because Doug will remain mad and take this as a personal attack when I have been completely objective. Doug should familiarize themself with Wikipedia's policy on 'Here to build an encyclopedia' and how blocking is not to be used as a tool to 'punish' someone you simply disagree with. ANE was Nordic (talk) 18:46, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
In order to be unblocked, you would need to understand that your start to Wikipedia has caused some problems. Opposition to racism is not a viewpoint that concerns me, but it seems to concern you. You could still edit Wikipedia and become a productive contributor, but you would need to dial down the talk page posts. Have a think about what I have said, and take your time before posting another unblock request. Blaming Doug and saying he shouldn't be an admin doesn't help your case. A more thoughtful unblock request could lead to an unblock. PhilKnight (talk) 21:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
