User talk:7mike5000

Please read: A personal appeal from an author of 3,647,328 Wikipedia articles

Nomination of List of suicide crisis lines for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of suicide crisis lines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of suicide crisis lines until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Psychonaut (talk) 10:03, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I answered. On the page, oh yeah, and your a dick. i have some high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines show that you are.7mike5000 (talk) 13:12, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just saying...

Some of your posts (while, certainly not "Wiki-civil") really cracked me up. Lol, nice DietFoodstamp (talk) 10:45, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what DietFoodstamp's referring to but I have to agree. You are very, very funny sometimes. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 11:35, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank's DietFoodstamp and Anthony, if I wasn't a poor, miserable and depressed bastard I could probably be a real riot (I still do look fabulous though). 7mike5000 (talk) 20:23, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Funny

That's funny; I typed out nearly exactly the same rant yesterday, but I didn't hit "save page". Now that you've had the vent, how about deleting it with an apology in your edit summary? Just to have less dramah so you can get on with what you really want to do. Whatever. Up to you. But with that kind of ammo morons can railroad you off the project, and I don't want that. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 13:26, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the sarcasm, (most of it), the fact is this Anthony. The article should not have been nominated for deletion in the first place. The people pushing for deletion have written nothing of note, some nothing at all. The two main protagonists, can not even follow basic Wikipedia policy concerning WP:REFERENCES and WP:NOTABILITY, yet they are given a platform for their disruptive behavior. And quite frankly I have more than enough to contend with, without the author of a List of Ultima characters and Andreas Derleth the winner of Mr. Gay World, aggravating the shit out of me. I answer their bullshit because because I would have a guilty conscience if something that may be useful to decent people (not douchebags) is deleted. It's the same B.S. as Silent Stroke, Depression (differential diagnoses), the lame-ass picture on the suicide article. Enough already.

Their should be more accountability on Wikipedia, everyone likes to showcase their aberrant psychology, but what they can't showcase is a modicum of skill or humane behavior. The self-deprecating Grand Poobah headcase that I am, at least I generally keep to myself, I am good-natured and I can write useful informative articles.

I deleted the numbers on List of suicide crisis lines, there is now no rational excuse to delete it. I'll talk to you later.7mike5000 (talk) 14:04, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete those numbers? As for the rest, so? So what? It's fucked. So what are you going to do about it? Get banned or stick around? Don't give people ammo. That's all.

We're up against it. It's a psychopathic/autistic organisation; somehow, we have to induce insight into it. Somehow we have to find the way to induce reflection in them. I'm fairly sure you're not going to do that by calling people dumb cunts. Not in this situation, where you can be seriously distracted for days or weeks by decorum enforcement procedures, or even banned if you handle it poorly. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 16:22, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, it sounds to me like you've got your head out of your arse. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 16:43, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony I've yet to call anyone a dumb cunt. I don't use bad words. I deleted the numbers because I have my own (redacted) to deal with and I can't play with the (redacted) right now, and I wanted to make sure there is no basis for deletion and at least the basic information is there and the website urls are accessible. I have something called a conscience, so just saying (redacted) it let them delete it would bother me.

The article didn't warrant a deletion tag in the first place, for someone who writes (redacted) articles about kiddie games to put it there is B.S.. Then another ignorant (redacted) pops put of the woodwork, who wrote an 'article' on the winner of the Mr. Gay World contest, and uses a twitter feed as a reference. And he compares the self-sacrifice of an Arctic explorer as an example of 'not all suicides are bad'. And these (redacted) callous indifferent (redacted) have the (redacted) to try and call the shots, and I have to walk on eggshells and kiss their (redacted) (redacted)?. (redacted).

I'm should start making der rules on Wikipedia. The first is the WP:BLAH-BLAH-BULLSHIT-RULE, you have to write and contribute a certain amount of 'useful information' and then you earn BLAH-BLAH-BULLSHIT points that entitle you to engage in bullshitting. After a person has utilized their WP:BLAH-BLAH-BULLSHIT-RULE points they are cut off.

My other rule is the WP:I've been plagiarized by doctors and medical journals and you haven't so shut the fuck up-Rule. My other one is the WP:Your a fat ugly motherfucker and I'm not (plus I have a great tan) so shut the fuck up and go eat a Twinkie-RULE.

Read this:[1]. Can you imagine the horror of jumping off a 40 story building and landing on your face? And she had everything going for her. She was being 'treated' for depression, I would have to say the treatment didn't work to well. How can people be indifferent about things like this.

Okay all done. The article doesn't warrant deletion, the tag should come off, It would be nice if someone actually put a little effort into it, I can not at present. And also the Trials and Tribulations of Mike keep me occupied full-time - the (redacted) never ends for me - so I have to go bye-bye for a while. If have said something that warrants a ban (I don't think so because I don't use bad words), I will have to banned in absentia. Catch you later Anthony.

P.S. I was clicking save when you as you were posting. My head is still in my ass but I have had some air. Believe it or not I'm actually not a melodramatic (redacted- because I don't use bad words) drama queen. As anyone who has had depression knows, for whatever the circumstances, you become a (redacted) poet. 7mike5000 (talk) 18:03, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. OK. That makes sense. If you decide to have a go at replacing the numbers come and get me and we'll do the secret cabal thing. Man, I know where you're coming from with this stuff - especially the differential diagnosis thing. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 20:41, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've always wanted to be a part of a secret cabal, I can't tell you how much that means to me Anthony. We should get like secret decoder rings and stuff.

On a serious note, of course it would be better to have the phone numbers, but without them the Twinkie-eaters can't bitch. There is no valid reason for it to be deleted beyond being a penis. The websites are still listed, the only thing that sucks is that, there is no dedicated one for the Native American Youth Crisis. You would think considering the high suicide rates in Native American kids that somebody would have the decency to start a website dedicated to them.

The sad part is this, it's a bitch getting help for suicidal behavior. First you need to have some knowledge, that's were Wikipedia can be helpful, like there are treatments that work, there is at least a ten percent chance a medical conditions is causing the underlying problem etc. Second, if a person is psychologically/neurologically compromised they need to be fortunate to have someone advocate on their behalf. Third of of course MONEY. And last but far from least actually finding a dedicated professional that knows the difference between their ass and their elbow.

Many are ignorant, and a lot have no conscience. If they did they would be utilizing Wikipedia. Most people don't knw what a differential diagnosis is. I read Medscape everyday, one article was on how only 30-40% of doctors prescribing atypical antipsychotics monitor the patients metabolic parameters. Because it's more profitable o hip out the prescription pad.

I may not be on Wikipedia for awhile or infrequently, so if you can just kind of make sure the dickheads misguided but well-meaning individuals don't delete the article I would be much obliged.

P.S. Now that we are part of a secret cabal of two, you are going to have to get one of those dedicated identity numbers, you know the kind the peckerheads secret agents on Wikipedia have. Also you are going to have to stop calling yourself Anthony, pick out a new identity, maybe something like Aunt Gertie, of course you will need a disguise and some fake boobs.

Okay thanks for doing the right thing, Aunt Gertie. 7mike5000 (talk) 00:35, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See you in the fullness of time. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 07:38, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That was rude of me. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 15:53, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What was? Did you fart? 7mike5000 (talk) 15:58, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Me removing that picture. I'd really rather you didn't do that. I have a lot of respect for both of you, and I don't like to see unnecessary goading. He's entitled to his view. It's your job to persuade him. Goading is a disruptive cop out. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 17:56, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added the picture back but I changed the caption a bit. Both Doc James and myself enjoy playing with our balls, I don't have any pictures of myself playing with my balls and that was the only picture available on Wikimedia. And honestly Anthony, as opposed to Herr Heilman placing Manet's le Suicide on the Suicide article, which I consider to be in poor taste to say the least, my utiliizing his public domain photograph is pretty innocuous. Plus I'm pathetic and need to humor myself. 7mike5000 (talk) 15:11, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martin Sommer Buchenwald.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Martin Sommer Buchenwald.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fifelfoo (talk) 01:39, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing FfD tags

Do not remove FfD until the deletion discussion has been concluded. What you did would be in bad form even if you weren't the uploader, but since you are the uploader, it's extremely bad form. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:34, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Putting baseless tags on images just because a person needs an ego stroke is extremely bad form, and is not the way you improve Wikipedia. Acting like you run the show, and leaving annoying messages for people who actually make useful positive contributions as opposed to writing about kiddie's video games is also extremely bad form, as is dictating in the manner you have. Alleging somebody engaged in "vandalism" is also (drum roll goes here) extremely bad form. Ta Da 7ven Mike5000 Huh? Wha? Who's on First?15:59, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. When you recently edited Battle of Long Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Howe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012 Study of authors of health-related Wikipedia pages

Dear Author/7mike5000

My name is Nuša Farič and I am a Health Psychology MSc student at University College London (UCL). I am currently running a quantitative study entitled Who edits health-related Wikipedia pages and why? I am interested in the editorial experience of people who edit health-related Wikipedia pages. I am interested to learn more about the authors of health-related pages on Wikipedia and what motivations they have for doing so. I am currently contacting the authors of randomly selected articles and I noticed that someone at this address recently edited an article on Congenital Fiber Type Disproportion. I would like to ask you a few questions about you and your experience of editing the above mentioned article. If you would like more information about the project, please visit my user page (Hydra_Rain) and if interested, please visit my Talk page or e-mail me on [e-mail]. Also, others interested in the study may contact me! If I do not hear back from you I will not contact this account again. Thank you very much in advance. 90.210.83.229 (talk) 23:52, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Raymond Vanessa Jackson Mugshots.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Raymond Vanessa Jackson Mugshots.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:11, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling: Bullenhuser Damm (picture)

Hi, there is a picture named "Children of Bullinhuser Damm.jpg" on the project. My question is: Why that incorrect spelling and should anything be done about it? - I'm a Newbie (and no native-speaker), just wanted to bring that to your attention, leaving it all to you more experienced contributors. On the page for the picture there is also something going on about "fair use rationale". Don't have any idea about this kind of legal stuff. I'm just an ordinary reader and think the picture should be kept in where it is needed. (No answer is needed. And of course, please delete this section here then right away, once you've read it and decided...) -- CaffeineCyclist (talk) 20:01, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Children of Bullinhuser Damm.jpg

Hi 7mike5000, tried to fix that legal stuff, adding "fair use rationale" (mainly copy and paste of yours, except for the description) for article Nazi human experimentation. - Would you please check whether it's OK now? - Seems the User who started that nuisance in the first place has quit WP during the meantime: User:Fastilysock. All that's rather strange (an "aka"-name or what???), can't make much sense of it neither. - Best. -- 46.115.35.40 (talk) 19:02, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It looks fine to me, but I'm also not anal retentive. I'm sure someone will have a problem with it eventually.

7mike5000 (talk) 04:31, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. When you recently edited West Nile virus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Vector (biology) and Fatigue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited West Nile virus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acute (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nice

[2] Have you thought about running it through the WP:GA gauntlet? --Anthonyhcole (talk) 09:40, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment Anthony, everybody needs one once in awhile, even people like me who fart to much. The article is not complete yet, I plagiarized some paragraphs from the CDC,(just not to leave sections blank till I have the time) there is more to be added, some to be parsed etc.

As far as Good Article status, quite frankly I put that up there with barnstars, wikicookies, editcounts and Doc James etc.

7mike5000 (talk) 09:56, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did it with Cancer pain, and found it a bit excoriating but good for the article. Don't do it, though, if you're not prepared to deal respectfully with arguments you believe to be unreasonable or immoral. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 07:08, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly Anthony, It really wouldn't phase me. It's a matter of opinion. I've made edits to articles that were considered featured articles. Plus I can't deal with most of the award-winning personalities on Wikipedia...myself included. I'm stuck with me but I prefer to avoid the others. 7mike5000 (talk) 07:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just checked out Cancer pain. You did an outstanding job, it looks great.7mike5000 (talk) 09:31, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I took it to WP:FAC and that was very valuable. A lot of holes and other shortcomings were uncovered. I'm having a break from it, but have a couple of excellent new textbooks on my hard drive so will get back to it when I've got more reading time. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 03:28, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:West nile virus rash.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:West nile virus rash.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 12:49, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it is. I was wondering how long it would take before a dexter jumped on it. 7mike5000 (talk) 15:11, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 September 5 and User talk:Nikkimaria#Feudal_organization.png. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your preoccupation with the functioning of other users' excretory organs (e.g., [3] [4]) doesn't make for a particularly pleasant environment for discussion. Psychonaut (talk) 09:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your the one who brags about being called a fat scumbag amongst other pleasntries. Am I correct? So please be a fat scumbag somewhere else. Thank You7mike5000 (talk) 09:21, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Washington

Hi Mike, if have ideas of how to improve this article, please raise them on the talk page first. That way we can get input from a few different users about how to incorporate them. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 22:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Sure, no es problema. I appreciate the civil tone of your post, that's rare on Wikipedia. 7mike5000 (talk) 22:55, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Assassination of John F. Kennedy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Secret Service

Black Death (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Fingers

Foster care in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mulberry Street

West Nile virus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gene sequencing

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith

This is regarding your comment, "obviously some people enjoy being disruptive and getting a rise out of irritating others" on Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 September 3#File:SA Army General rank.jpg. Please be civil and assume good faith when dealing with other editors. My rule of thumb is that you should not say something to someone online that you wouldn't say to them in person. You do not endear yourself to others when you make comments like that, and it may cause your comments to be discounted when administrators close deletion discussions if they read your comment with the personal attack as unproductive. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:16, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No offense SchuminWeb I'm a big boy and I don't need lessons in civility from you or any of the other individuals that have nothing better to do then troll boards and leave annoying messages. All you have just managed to do is piss me off and waste my time. I spend 99% of my time on Wikipedia improving it. Like writing things that get plagiarized by effing neurologists and trying to help people by putting useful medical information where it belongs, the first or near first spot in the search engine. I rarely if ever comment on anything. Plus I left that comment 11 DAYS AGO. So I politely ask you spare the me the Miss Manners routine and don't leave me any other annoying messages. 7mike5000 (talk) 23:32, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Inland salt marsh, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Saltwater and Precipitation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please use secondary sources

Per WP:MEDRS Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:24, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Poorly Made in China-cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Poorly Made in China-cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:25, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for civility issues

My friend.

During 7mike's previous block it was agreed that he would be civil going forwards and that he would be reblocked if he did not comply.[5] Per the ongoing concerns here [6] and [7] he has made it clear that he is not complying. I have thus blocked him. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 15:58, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested further community consensus here [8] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:40, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Heilmann!!!, I really don't have the time to play with you at the moment, so just a short missive:

• You are full of it. You blocked me because of I had the audacity to say something to you, for deleting my edits on the Suicide article.
• You misused the administrator tools more than once: you deleted an edit summary from the suicide article, and were effing around when I was editing the Anxiety disorder article correcting doing the same thing repeatedly until I commented on it.
• Off color humor isn't uncivil. And i don't have to walk on egg-shells.
• I noticed somebody wanted to know Does he do anything useful?[9]. I don't have the time to get into to much detail right now but here is a little reminder:

I write medical information like Silent stroke, Depression (differential diagnoses),West Nile virus, redoing the Suicide article including adding relevant sections like um PREVENTION and TREATMENT in an effort to help people. And then of course I was plagiarized by neurologists, medical journals etc. I would say useful.

That's it for now mi amigo. 7mike5000 (talk) 00:56, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I have to tell you James, I was very disappointed in you, I thought we were tight. I even had your picture, this one, on my User Page[10]. but then I noticed that you have been making hundreds or edits[11] - sometimes only a minute apart - to the Hemorrhoid article recently, so if you are not feeling well then I can understand. If you need someone to talk to about it I'm all ears here is my email [e-mail]. I hope you feel better. 7mike5000 (talk) 01:21, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So. What now? Do you have any suggestions regarding what you can do/change that will get you unblocked? Perhaps canning the proctology references? Maybe assuming good faith and not pointing out the failings of others? James said in his email you'd been over-relying on primary sources on Suicide. Do you know what he was talking about? We can probably get you back editing if you try harder on the civility thing, but I'd like to know what the sources issue is before thinking about that. I'll ask at James's talk page. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 01:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No self deprecating sycophancy this time

Heilmann's work on Suicide

Hi Anthony, I was wondering if there is anyway to check if an administrator abuses the administrative tools? Someone with this administrator tools was misusing them when i was editing the lede section on Anxiety disorder. The edits were not going through so I went to other articles and tried and there was no problem. When I went back to Anxiety disorder and left this comment:

That's funny my edits are showing up on other articles but not on this one, so no server lag, is somebody playing with their tool(s), let's try.and 14% of Europeans

it stopped. I believe it was Heilmann as he was on changing the "wording" 15 minutes before.[12]. Actually disrupting Wikipedia and misusing the administrator tools in order to harass another user is far more serious than my petty civility issues. Also I wrote a message asking you about it when it happened I clicked "Show Preview" but not save as the edits went through after I made the aforementioned comments in the articles edit summary. Can an administrator see what someone else is previewing.

This is what led to the block, Heilmann reverted legitimate edits to the Suicide article and I responded:
Undid revision 513320587 by You reverted all the wikilinks too/ You like tbeing in the New York Times much. I have an incredible story i can tell them/. learn how to write and don't preach to me.

I responded in that fashion due partly to the previous harassment, partly because Heilmann has contributed nothing of note to the Suicide article beyond two garish maps and what any normal person coniders an entirely inappropriate image and also it is incredibly audacious for an individual to preach om how to write medical articles when that same individual can't even get the name of a disorder right[13]. And considers one line on this misnamed disorder an article.[14], when the person he is preaching to, is capable of not only correcting his misinformation but also writing a "medical article". Here is another medical article he has written, Olcegepant and uses only one reference of the dreaded "primary reference".

That's what Heilmann is capable of: one line articles and taking credit for other people's work by forking off sections from main articles like. 1.Bedbug infestations: [15] 2.Physical Therapy/Occupational therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome:[16] 3.Epidemiology of breast cancer[17] Or articles like this Rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease which he "created" in which he cuts and pastes other people work from websites like for example:
Heilmann's work: Regular physical exercise with or without physiotherapy can be beneficial to maintain and improve mobility, flexibility, strength, gait speed, and quality of life. was copied verbatim from [[18]], which to paraphrase Heilmann:

When someone points out that an image that one uploads infringes on copyright as was done here Sept 6 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:7mike5000#File:West_nile_virus_rash.jpg_listed_for_deletion and you reply that they are a "dexter" we have a problem. Copyright infringement is a huge issue.

I used an image which I did not claim as my own obviously, while he is committing blatant copyright violations through blatant plagiarism. This Rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease looks decent now becasue User:SandyGeorgia did most of it. More plagiarism:Risk factors for tuberculosis, "Heilmann's words": "Diet may also modulate risk. For example, among immigrants in London from the Indian subcontinent, vegetarian Hindu Asians were found to have an 8.5 fold increased risk of tuberculosis, compared to Muslims who ate meat and fish daily". Article was "created" on Dec. 29, 2011, where he plagiarized it from[19]] was written on or prior to March 24, 2011.

WP:Plagiarism

N Copying from an unacknowledged source

• Inserting a text—copied word-for-word, or with very few changes—from a source that is not acknowledged anywhere in the article, either in the body of the article, or in footnotes, the references section, or the external links section.

• The above is the most egregious form of plagiarism, and the least likely to be accidental

Heilmann is a liar, a plagiarist and grossly incompetent in writing medical content which he refers to as medicine content. The block was done due to personal malice against me on his part. I have been plagiarized by medical journals, neurologists, stem cell research centers etc. and this fraud plagiarizes others work VERBATIM. He tries to delete Silent stroke which I wrote, and was the one plagiarized out of pettiness. I write sections on suicide prevention and treating for suicidal ideation on the Suicide and he puts garish inappropriate cartoons on

Assume good faith?, the reason for the block is a lie: so liar, copy and pasting other's words verbatim is plagiarism:plagiarist, can't even get the name of a medical disorder right yet write an article on it: gross incompetance.

I was going to write Child abuse (skin signs): and do whatever necessary to get the appropriate copyright compliant images so the information is readily accesible and nobody can claim ignorance, put information that is actually useful; such as the subject of brain maturation on Youth Suicide as well as a section on Youth Suicide on the Suicide article, add more information on Pituitary adenoma,Skull bossing, Transfusion therapy (Sickle-cell disease), in my own words not cut and paste plagiarism, amongst other articles. And I have to kiss this plagiarist guy's rear? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 7mike5000 (talk • contribs) 13:44, 22 September 2012

[20]Totally uncontroverial block. Shame on anyone who would consider ignoring such flagrant long-term hositility on grounds of productivity: we have masses of editors who edit productively who can behave civilly. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 12:36, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Really? since Heilmann can't write maybe this guy can write the articles I was going to, or maybe someone from the "masses of editors". So let the block ride. It's not my loss. 7mike5000 (talk) 13:44, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Medicine Barnstar
		Congratulations! For getting your article Silent stroke plagiarized by neurologists and not being a plagiarizing worthless dork. Non-dork (talk) 10:34, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful to hear :-) Doc Billy Joe Jim Bob (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 13:17, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're entitled to think what you like about other editors; but not say what you like.

• I noticed that edit summary at Anxiety disorder. Admins can't see your previews - that's not one of the permissions that come with the job. And neither can they prevent any individual from editing a particular article. The article may have been briefly protected from all edits, execpt admins, and if so, there would be an on-wiki record somewhere. I've asked at the village pump [21]
• The copy-and-paste and close paraphrase are inappropriate and need to be addressed but, like your importation of an image, they're relatively minor infringements provided they're isolated lapses and are corrected when noticed.
• As for creating articles with content from other articles, that happens all the time for many reasons including when a section becomes too big for its article. James is the least glory-seeking editor I know. He is not motivated by a desperate need for recognition (that does seem to motivate some editors here but I don't count either of you in that class). So he's not doing it to pump up the number of articles he's created, and he acknowledged the source article in each of the examples.
• I believe James's block was inappropriate given your shared history but believe an uninvolved admin was likely to block you anyway, for your disrespectful tone towards editors who annoy you. I hope you can learn to cut that out, because unless you can, you won't survive here.

You and I both disagree with James on the illustration for suicide. If you come back to editing, I'll work with you to get that changed back to Socrates sipping hemlock. I don't have the energy to do it on my own. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 13:52, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replies to concerns raised regarding my editing

• Hi Anthony, I was wondering if there is anyway to check if an administrator abuses the administrative tools? Someone with this administrator tools was misusing them when i was editing the lede section on Anxiety disorder. The edits were not going through so I went to other articles and tried and there was no problem. When I went back to Anxiety disorder and left this comment: That's funny my edits are showing up on other articles but not on this one, so no server lag, is somebody playing with their tool(s), let's try.and 14% of Europeans it stopped. I believe it was Heilmann as he was on changing the "wording" 15 minutes before.[22]. Actually disrupting Wikipedia and misusing the administrator tools in order to harass another user is far more serious than my petty civility issues. Also I wrote a message asking you about it when it happened I clicked "Show Preview" but not save as the edits went through after I made the aforementioned comments in the articles edit summary. Can an administrator see what someone else is previewing.

I previously edited that page 2 days and 15 minutes ago. The powers you describe do not exist.Doc James (talk · contribs ·email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:06, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• It is incredibly audacious for an individual to preach om how to write medical articles when that same individual can't even get the name of a disorder right[23]. And considers one line on this misnamed disorder an article.[24], when the person he is preaching to, is capable of not only correcting his misinformation but also writing a "medical article".

I agreed with you suggestion and moved it.[25] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:06, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Here is another medical article he has written, Olcegepant and uses only one reference of the dreaded "primary reference". That's what Heilmann is capable of: one line articles and taking credit for other people's work by forking off sections from main articles like.

Yes that article is one line. However the ref is listed as a review article by pubmed not as a primary source[26]. When I write GAs I do not like red links remaining in the text and thus at least start something on these pages. Back in 2010 I worked on this backlogged page hereWikipedia:Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Medicine and created many short stubs.Doc James (talk · contribs ·email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:06, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• 1.Bedbug infestations: [27] 2.Physical Therapy/Occupational therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome:[28]

3.Epidemiology of breast cancer[29]

In the edit summary of each of the first edits that created these pages I stated where the content was from. This is standard practice. Doc James (talk ·contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:06, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Or articles like this Rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease which he "created" in which he cuts and pastes other people work from websites like for example: Heilmann's work: Regular physical exercise with or without physiotherapy can be beneficial to maintain and improve mobility, flexibility, strength, gait speed, and quality of life. was copied verbatim from[[30]] I used an image which I did not claim as my own obviously, while he is committing blatant copyright violations through blatant plagiarism. This Rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease looks decent now becasue User:SandyGeorgia did most of it.

This content was from the main Parkinson's disease page and was not written by myself. One can see the wording on the mainParkinson's disease article. While I agree there are concerns it is not clear who has plagiarized from whom. While our content is referenced theirs is not so I think it is more likely they from us. My justification for creating this is here[31]. We basically had a class of students who where learning how to edit. We wanted something other than a feature article where they could do this. I have left Sandy a note as she was mentioned. Doc James (talk ·contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:24, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• More plagiarism:Risk factors for tuberculosis, "Heilmann's words": "Diet may also modulate risk. For example, among immigrants in London from the Indian subcontinent, vegetarian Hindu Asians were found to have an 8.5 fold increased risk of tuberculosis, compared to Muslims who ate meat and fish daily". Article was "created" on Dec. 29, 2011, where he plagiarized it from[32]] was written on or prior to March 24, 2011.

Once again just content that I moved from the main article as I was bringing tuberculosis to GA. The source you give [33] actually credits Wikipedia thus no concerns. I did not indicate where I moved it from in this case and thus will make a note on the talk page.Doc James (talk ·contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:24, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Sky Chief.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sky Chief.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:08, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked

You have been blocked from editing your talkpage due to personal attacks. You may still contest any current block by using the unblock ticket request system, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 14:35, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My email is enabled if you want to discuss this. It's bedtime here. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 15:26, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uninvited tidy-up of your userpage

• alot -> a lot
• lot's ->lots
• Im -> I'm
• slightley -> slightly
• Independance -> Independence
• Chimpanzess -> Chimpanzees
• acces -> access
• deficets -> deficits
• competant -> competent
• incompetance -> incompetence
• resrvation -> reservation
• recieves -> receives
• Flatulance -> Flatulence
• Cheny -> Cheney

Please get yourself un-blocked soon, 7mike5000. --Shirt58 (talk) 17:12, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"This user has chosen not to receive e-mail from other users."--Shirt58 (talk) 17:18, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beach, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Trash and Wrack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On Terrell Peterson

I just want to congratulate you for the good work on Terrell Peterson. This is one of the most horrifying crimes I have read about and it is important to keep the memory of this poor, massacred boy. Although I have no connection to his story, or even to your country, I cannot take this tragedy from my mind. And it should be that way, to everyone.

Thank you. --Brandizzi (talk) 02:09, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	hi, thanks for the File:Coronary heart disease-atherosclerosis.PNG, we recently had an editathon at the NIH; perhaps you would be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine. Duckduckgo (talk) 16:22, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dachau death march.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dachau death march.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 01:45, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	Well, I guess that the funniness of your user page exceeds that of mine. Epicgenius^(give him tirade • check out damage) 18:16, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I just wanted to thank you personally, and on behalf of these people for the good work you've done here. Hope you're well. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 02:24, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Georg Lorner.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Georg Lorner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:19, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Raymond Vanessa Jackson Mugshots.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Raymond Vanessa Jackson Mugshots.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:12, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paul Uhlenhuth.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paul Uhlenhuth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:38, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Monson Motor Lodge.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Monson Motor Lodge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Max Pauly.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Max Pauly.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. GMG^talk 12:37, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Child abuse (skin signs) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Child abuse (skin signs) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Child abuse (skin signs) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Metaloaf (talk) 18:15, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arnold Strippel (1911-1994).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arnold Strippel (1911-1994).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:John Grass.jpg

The file File:John Grass.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Brooklyn Bridge Underconstruction-.jpg

The file File:Brooklyn Bridge Underconstruction-.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Government House St. Augustine.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Government House St. Augustine.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 20:48, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Johnson Tonkawa Scout.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Johnson Tonkawa Scout.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 21:40, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ruling His Son Pawnee.jpg

The file File:Ruling His Son Pawnee.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ruling His Son.jpg

The file File:Ruling His Son.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Youra Livschitz.jpg

The file File:Youra Livschitz.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Foster care length of stay.gif

The file File:Foster care length of stay.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no information on an encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Menachem taffel.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Menachem taffel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kim Winona.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kim Winona.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Homer Harold Cox Vorkuta Gulag.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Homer Harold Cox Vorkuta Gulag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Battle for Whiteclay-documentary.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Battle for Whiteclay-documentary.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mala zimetbaum.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mala zimetbaum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bruno Emil Tesch.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bruno Emil Tesch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:16, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I miss you

Monkey ass and all, please come back - Floydian ^τ _¢ 16:53, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]