User talk:70.56.26.237

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

70.56.26.237 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please copy my appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard or administrators' noticeboard. I accused two currently banned sockmasters, Ryulong and Tarc, of being sock masters. I also accused PetertheFourth of being Ryulong's sock since he started editing right before Ryulong was "retired," he started editing the Gamergate Arbcom page for his first edits (in defense of Ryulong I believe), and has since then behaved exactly like Ryulong with his obsessive POV pushing and Gamergate SPA editing behavior. PetertheFourth is obviously a real sockpuppet account based on his behavior and the timing of his account creation. Of course, certain anti-Gamergate admins don't wan that being brought to light and have done their best to hide the obvious and enable PetertheFourth and other obvious sockpuppets in their POV pushing and BLP violations. 70.56.26.237 (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. --jpgordon^::==( o ) 18:58, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Shrug. I'm comfortable with my sexuality; your problems with yours are of no importance to me. --jpgordon^::==( o ) 20:51, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IP70, see, when you make accusations and present them as facts without providing any evidence to support them, they are seen as personal attacks and now you've been sanctioned. When your account is unblocked, do not act in a similar way or the consequences will be more severe. Liz ^Read! Talk! 21:05, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Clay. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.