User talk:649pardeepRe:Addition of ATQ-IXC leg on DXB FlightUser @649Pardeep,it may have been came to our notice that due to Wikipidea's Policy of Conflict of Interest (COI),we are barred to edit anything related otherwise about our company taking source as external links before any official announcement is made.For your point of Interest,Due to my links in National Network planning dept IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Pvt Ltd) As per latest update the plans for ATQ-IXC-DXB flight has been very near to shelved since bith ATQ-DXB and IXC-DXB are expected/running on over 90% occupancy which calls it unviable for involving extra costs for the sake of feeder traffic.A new,additional flight between ATQ and IXC however is still under consideration.I would also like to inform that IndiGo is planning to connect Singapore/Doha with IXC and Doha/Kuwait/London Luton(Late 2019) with ATQ as part of future expansions as far as these 2 airports are concerned with respect to International Connectivity.I,However,request you to keep this information highly confidential since any leak of information in media or otherwise pisses off the Network Planning and they may swap plans at last moments like they had done before. Thank you for your time We Work for a Working Airport at Surat (talk) 04:21, 16 October 2018 (UTC) Thank you , still is there any plan for new (domestic and international) destinations from IXC. 649pardeep (talk) 06:34, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Helpful links
649pardeep (talk) 10:07, 4 February 2019 (UTC) Please participate to the talk pages consultationHello Our team at the Wikimedia Foundation is working on a project to improve the ease-of-use and productivity of wiki talk pages. As a Teahouse host, I can imagine you’ve run into challenges explaining talk pages to first-time participants. We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis – to ask questions, to resolve differences, to organize projects and to make decisions. Communication is essential for the depth and quality of our content, and the health of our communities. We're currently leading a global consultation on how to improve talk pages, and we're looking for people that can report on their experiences using (or helping other people to use) wiki talk pages. We'd like to invite you to participate in the consultation, and invite new users to join too. We thank you in advance for your participation and your help. Trizek (WMF), 08:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC) Please participate to the talk pages consultation - link updateThe previous message about the talk pages consultation has a broken link. The correct link has been misinterpreted by the MassMessage tool. Please use the following link: Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019. Sorry for the inconvenience, Trizek (WMF), 08:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC) Need help moving Draft:Ho'okena into main space. Allanbcool (talk) 11:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Ho'okena has been accepted Ho'okena, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:35, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Hindon AirportPlease take a look at Talk:Hindon Airport#Merger discussion. Thanks. - Jpsorts (talk) 20:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC) A pie for you!
Community Insights SurveyShare your experience in this survey Hi 649pardeep, The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages. This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey. Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 16:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC) Reminder: Community Insights SurveyShare your experience in this survey Hi 649pardeep, A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us. Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages. This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey. Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC) Reminder: Community Insights SurveyShare your experience in this survey Hi 649pardeep, There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide. Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages. This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey. Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC) ArbCom 2019 election voter messageDraft:Juliet LyonsAloha, Need your support helping me to move Draft:Juliet Lyons into the main space. Allanbcool (talk) Aloha! Creating record/album pages for Kalani. I have one of two albums done so far. Can you assist to have it moved into main space. See Draft:E Walea Thanks! Allanbcool (talk) 06:27, 22 December 2019 (UTC) Draft:No 'Ane'i is also now ready to be moved into main space. Hope you can help. Allanbcool (talk) 10:18, 22 December 2019 (UTC) ArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageJanuary 2021Your recent editing history at Sri Guru Ram Dass Jee International Airport shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — LeoFrank Talk 14:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC) ArbCom 2021 Elections voter messageNomination of Guru Nanak Foundation Public School, Mohali for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guru Nanak Foundation Public School, Mohali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guru Nanak Foundation Public School, Mohali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Peter Ormond 💬 22:03, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |