Hey there! I have initiated a discussion about the trimming of content and what should and shouldn't be in a lead and event sections of a racing facility. I've noticed your interest in expanding the racing facility pages of WP:MOTORSPORTS; if possible, I'd like to hear your feedback on what you feel should be included. Currently, edits are getting disruptive and I'd love to come to a consensus on what the pages should be like. The discussion is located here. Thanks! Cheers! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 01:30, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241013013000","author":"Nascar9919","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Nascar9919-20241013013000-WP:MOTORSPORTS_discussion","replies":["c-45BearsFan-20241015160400-Nascar9919-20241013013000"]}}-->
@Nascar9919 For sure, sorry for such a late response. I feel like tracks should have some sort of history tab and a little info on what the track was before it came to be (like in this case, Pocono Raceway started as a cabbage farm). 45BearsFan (talk) 16:04, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241015160400","author":"45BearsFan","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-45BearsFan-20241015160400-Nascar9919-20241013013000","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-B-bot-20241014170100","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:2023_Red_River_Rivalry_Logo.png-20241014170100","replies":["c-B-bot-20241014170100-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:2023_Red_River_Rivalry_Logo.png"],"text":"Orphaned non-free image File:2023 Red River Rivalry Logo.png","linkableTitle":"Orphaned non-free image File:2023 Red River Rivalry Logo.png"}-->
Orphaned non-free image File:2023 Red River Rivalry Logo.png
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-B-bot-20241014170100","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:2023_Red_River_Rivalry_Logo.png-20241014170100","replies":["c-B-bot-20241014170100-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:2023_Red_River_Rivalry_Logo.png"],"text":"Orphaned non-free image File:2023 Red River Rivalry Logo.png","linkableTitle":"Orphaned non-free image File:2023 Red River Rivalry Logo.png"}-->
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:2023 Red River Rivalry Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:01, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241014170100","author":"B-bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-B-bot-20241014170100-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:2023_Red_River_Rivalry_Logo.png","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-BarrelProof-20241017185900","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-RM_closure_for_Quaker_State_400-20241017185900","replies":["c-BarrelProof-20241017185900-RM_closure_for_Quaker_State_400"],"text":"RM closure for Quaker State 400","linkableTitle":"RM closure for Quaker State 400"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-BarrelProof-20241017185900","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-RM_closure_for_Quaker_State_400-20241017185900","replies":["c-BarrelProof-20241017185900-RM_closure_for_Quaker_State_400"],"text":"RM closure for Quaker State 400","linkableTitle":"RM closure for Quaker State 400"}-->
Your RM closure at Talk:Quaker State 400 (Atlanta)#Requested move on 5 October 2024 seems strange. There was no objection to the proposed move, so how could it be closed as "Not moved" with no explanation? And you were the proposer! Perhaps you meant to close it as "Withdrawn" instead, although even in that case, I think you should provide some explanation. — BarrelProof (talk) 18:59, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241017185900","author":"BarrelProof","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BarrelProof-20241017185900-RM_closure_for_Quaker_State_400","replies":["c-45BearsFan-20241017190300-BarrelProof-20241017185900"]}}-->
I didn't know what to list it as, since there was no say in the requested move. 45BearsFan (talk) 19:03, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241017190300","author":"45BearsFan","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-45BearsFan-20241017190300-BarrelProof-20241017185900","replies":["c-BarrelProof-20241017191400-45BearsFan-20241017190300"]}}-->
Assuming you still support your own proposal, you should've just left it open and waited for someone independent to close it. Such a discussion would ordinarily be closed in favor of the proposal under WP:RMNOMIN, unless someone has something new to say. I suggest to just revert your closure. If you want me to do that for you, I am willing. — BarrelProof (talk) 19:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241017191400","author":"BarrelProof","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-BarrelProof-20241017191400-45BearsFan-20241017190300","replies":["c-45BearsFan-20241017192300-BarrelProof-20241017191400","c-45BearsFan-20241021001300-BarrelProof-20241017191400"]}}-->
The discussion is now back open, I will close it until someone independent has a say in in, sorru bout the confusion. 45BearsFan (talk) 19:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241017192300","author":"45BearsFan","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-45BearsFan-20241017192300-BarrelProof-20241017191400","replies":[]}}-->
@BarrelProof: update on QS400's discussion, a user stated that they would like to see the original article (the one without (kentucky) or (atlanta)) be converted into a disambiguation link for a while, to settle down the drama with the 2 articles. What should I do? 45BearsFan (talk) 00:13, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241021001300","author":"45BearsFan","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-45BearsFan-20241021001300-BarrelProof-20241017191400","replies":["c-BarrelProof-20241021033100-45BearsFan-20241021001300"]}}-->
It might be a good idea. At least someone should review Special:WhatLinksHere/Quaker State 400 and retarget the links to unambiguous titles, because a lot of those links are probably trying to link to the Kentucky topic. The first article I see in the list of links is Dale Earnhardt Jr., which is trying to refer to the Kentucky topic, but now isn't. — BarrelProof (talk) 03:31, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241021033100","author":"BarrelProof","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-BarrelProof-20241021033100-45BearsFan-20241021001300","replies":[]}}-->
