Hello, I'm KH-1. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KH-1 (talk) 05:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tsar Bomba has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tsar Bomba was changed by 24.244.200.2(u)(t) ANN scored at 0.888855 on 2017-11-02T08:51:36+00:00 .
Your recent contributions have introduced uncited figures, changed cited figures, and altered the meaning of existing sourced content. Please slow down and use the articles' talk pages to discuss your changes. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 19:36, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The bald assertion that "these numbers are not fact" is not sufficient. Please open a discussion on the article's talk page if you believe the figures are in error. Even if they're inaccurate, abitrarily subtracting 2,000,000 from each number doesn't make them more accurate. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 19:40, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Second Sino-Japanese War. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
As a favor to you, rather than reporting you for edit-warring, I've done what you were asked to do and opened up a discussion at Talk:Second Sino-Japanese War. If you can get consensus there, well and good. If you can't, your edits will be reverted again after a reasonable cooling-off period. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 23:54, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Pchum Ben into Veneration of the dead. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa🍁 (talk) 12:34, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
