User talk:213.109.242.161September 2019Hello, I'm Lupin VII. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bavar-373 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lupin VII (talk) 22:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to HESA Saeqeh, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ZLEA T\C 23:11, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
hello i don't think that you Accept that this was is a natural source ""The Buzz :: Why Iran's Fighter-Jet Ripoff Is Just Fake News" this is why i am deleted that in the HESA Saeqeh page and in baver 373 page i am removed this for began a besided "a Russian missile defense system developed over four decades ago that is already scheduled to be phased out in favor of the superior S-400 and S-500" firstly the s 500 is not even unveiled yet and the harsh language used in this Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Bavar-373, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. ZLEA T\C 00:39, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at HESA Saeqeh. ZLEA T\C 00:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Bavar-373I was going to respond to your message on my talk page, but I see that I'm not the only one who has reverted this edit. Why will you not accept the consensus? That's what the reviewing process is for. WQUlrich (talk) 01:21, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
September 2019Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} . Ad Orientem (talk) 05:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia