User talk:2003 LN6

User page Talk page Sandbox Contributions Logs Rights Achievements Userboxes Awards Essays Pages Status

This is 2003 LN6's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 4 months

Archives (Index)

1 s/2 s/ 1

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Speedy deletion nomination of Manniella

Hello 2003 LN6,

I'm Joseywales1961, and I patrol new pages here on Wikipedia.

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged a page that you created (Manniella) for deletion because it is unnecessary per one of the criteria at WP:G14.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales^Parley 18:57, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseywales1961: I plan to create the other subgenus article soon. It is notable enough for an article. Thank you! 2003 LN6 19:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081284811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303819644288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081284811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303819644288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 13 § 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081284811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303819644288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456 until a consensus is reached. Renerpho (talk) 04:49, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited addition to lead section of Leafcutter ants

Hello, I have noticed that you have recently reverted my edits on the page leafcutter ant. The problem with that page is that it is quite outdated, and needs extensive restructuring after Amoimyrmex was designated back in 2020 as a third genus of leafcutter ants. I plan to update the article in the coming days to fit this change. Thank you! Sources: [1] [2]. 2003 LN6 04:29, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for discussing. As I wrote just now in my edit comment, which it does not seem that you read, "rv, you can't "update" an article by adding "new" and wholly uncited materials to the lead: it's just a summary of the article. Add what you want to the article body, cited to WP:RS, then (if need be) adjust the lead to match". I'm happy to stand by that. If the article is "outdated", then the place to update it is the article body, not the lead. Your edit immediately reduced the quality of the article in two ways: by making the lead inconsistent with the body, and by introducing an uncited claim. That is, to be clear about it, the wrong direction — worse not better. If you plan to do something, make your plans, find your sources, read WP:V and WP:CITE and WP:RS (core policies all of them), then update the article properly, and everybody will thank you for it. As for your hasty edit, it was correctly reverted, with a correct and fully explanatory edit comment. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 04:35, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiswick Chap Fixed. Thank you. 2003 LN6 05:37, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{Talk header}}

Re: [3][4] and a few others, per Template:Talk header#Should this be added to every talk page?, "This template does not need to be placed on every talk page, and should not be indiscriminately added to talk pages." If you do find a page worthy of {{Talk header}}, please place it according to Wikipedia:Talk page layout#Lead (bannerspace).   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  22:44, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1967 Tropical Cyclone Report

Hey! Could you translate the Chinese in this Tropical Cyclone Report by the Central Weather Administration and add the info here if you have time? Tavantius (talk) 15:49, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stigmatomma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lithomyrmex.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Camponotus inflatus

On 16 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Camponotus inflatus, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a species of Australian ant has special workers that make honey, and is considered a delicacy by Aboriginal Australians? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Camponotus inflatus. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Camponotus inflatus), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]