User talk:110.174.50.79

January 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or write things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you.--Quisqualis (talk) 13:53, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.-- Quisqualis (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing because most of your editing is more like playing around than making serious contributions to the encyclopaedia, and the time you cause editors to put into clearing up could be more usefully spent on more constructive work. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) 23:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

110.174.50.79 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

help a tea was teahouse pls help unblocked me

Decline reason:

Incoherant. --jpgordon^𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 06:09, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since your response to the block has been to continue your idiotic playing around on this page, indicating that you still have no intention of making constructive contributions to the encyclopaedia, I have increased the length of the block, and removed your ability to edit this page. JBW (talk) 14:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

110.174.50.79 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

pls help go teahouse Don't Clearly not here to contribute to building the encyclopaedia stop unblock me 24 hours 210.23.177.234 (talk) 07:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC) [reply]

Decline reason:

Formality, as talk page access has been revoked so no discussion would be possible. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have further lengthened the block—to a month—for the use of the above IP to evade the block and talk page access revocation. The IP used will be blocked for the same period. If the same disruptive editing continues from other ranges, semi-protection is strongly advised, as well as further extensions of the blocks. Daniel Case (talk) 07:33, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]