If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chonlanan Srikaew, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Srettha cabinet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Democracy Party.
Dear user ~ ToBeFree, I want to report that อย่ามาตบะ has violate Wikipedia's harassment policy. With the message of "ผมว่าคุณกำลังอันตรายมากกว่า เพราะคุณเป็น ไอพี ซึ่งสามารถค้นหาได้ว่าคุณอยู่ไหน" it means "I think you're more dangerous because you're an IP that can find out where you are". From this message, I feel like I was threatened and may be harmed by this user. Can I report this incident for my own safety? 58.8.170.142 (talk) 10:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not intimidating. But I would like to say that IP is addressable. And I told him to apply but he didn't. And he also said, He knew my personal information even though I didn't write the address. อย่ามาตบะ (talk) 10:19, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I understand it's a free encyclopedia. But if any position is specified which has the effect of the constitution or act It shouldn't be deleted. อย่ามาตบะ (talk) 12:53, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Relativity was:
This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read "What Wikipedia is not" for more information.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Next Thai general election and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hi อย่ามาตบะ listen you have done a lot of good edits on the list but you need to put the military leaders back acting prime ministers are important they should be treated like regular prime ministers . You can put a yellow backround to mark them are as acting as an example look the presidential list of the president of Gabon article as for the reverts 2409:4052:71c:2f26::1e3e:38a5 is not me there is a number of people who are doing bad edits . If you see my history i have reverted edits by acounts like this one . You should request someone to lock the article so that only people with accounts can edit it . Anyway tell me what you think also take care and happy editing Friendlyhistorian (talk) 15:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that, but those acting military leaders His team is not the Cabinet. But I have reduced the size and saved space. But some acting officials are still under the Cabinet.
Hi, I've undone your edit where you removed Imran Khan's independent candidates from the infobox. Have you seen the ongoing discussion on the Talk page regarding this matter? You referenced the 2021 Tongan general election, but I believe the situation in Pakistan is different. These independent candidates are supported by PTI/Imran Khan and are being identified as such in reliable sources. Saqib (talk) 10:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Please do not arbitrarily change data before 2022 until the discussion is concluded.
The data you change is probably something that people will disagree about, and that will be done in a discussion. Until these discussions are "finished" and a conclusion is reached, such information must be "previous." In other words, the "problem that the Netherlands in 2022 will be classified in the same way as Norway" was changed based on your own judgment. "Do not make changes until the discussion is over" is not "my personal opinion", but I think it is the etiquette of Wikipedia as a whole. Minchuchui (talk) 22:59, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You say that it confuses viewers, but that in itself is just your opinion. I don't think that's a good reason to arbitrarily change past data without discussion. Even if it is a trivial change such as a color-coded classification, or the reason for unifying data standards, changing past information requires a mature discussion. “Until the discussion is over, we must follow the data released in the past!!” Minchuchui (talk) 23:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I'm a bit confused by the caption you added to the main 2023 election infobox map. What do you mean by "official" results and why are they different to most voted-for party? Cheers, Number5720:00, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry if I'm being thick but what does this map show? Is it the winners of the 400 constituency seats? And this one is the most-voted for party in the party-list element of the election? Number5722:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not related at all. 5% rule is used in every article. Only applicants with more than 5% of the votes can be included in the inbox. Except there is only one applicant with scores exceeding 5%, which can add 1 more applicant according to this example #list and #listอย่ามาตบะ (talk) 13:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know about Bangkok or even Thai politics; the same I guess you know nothing about Filipino politics. If people want to be imposed by the 5% rule willfully ignoring WP:INFOBOX, that's on them. WP:LOCALCONSENSUS, even set by WP:RFCs, don't overrule global consensus.
Yeah, I know User:Number 57; I have no problem with that guy. If the rest of the community's consensus is decidedly against him, that's okay on him. He sometimes imposes his own interpretation, such as WP:NCGAL, which was overruled in Talk:2019 San Marino general election#Mass move request where the community thought it was more in keeping in WP:RS in regards "San Marino" vs. "Sammarinese". After that WP:RM, he no longer imposes that guideline as the community overruled it on an actual RM. Again, global consensus trumps local consensus. Reliable sources trumps whatever math solutions. Howard the Duck (talk) 14:03, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, 2011 Singaporean presidential election (the election contested by 4 men all surnamed Tan) had Tan Kin Lian falling in 4.91% of the vote, but was included in the infobox; he was even distant fourth placer. Again, 5% is not a hard and fast rule. Winner Tony appeared 54 times on the article, Cheng Bock 42, Jee Say 28, Kin Lian 29. The bottom two candidates were mentioned just about the same number of times. WP:INFOBOX mandates you to add Kin Lian if you'd add Jee Say. Howard the Duck (talk) 14:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Howard the Duck: To clarify, the 5% rule is for presidential/mayoral elections and not for parliamentary ones. However, the 5% rule was agreed via an RfC at WT:E&R, so is not a "local consensus" that applies to a single country or article set. The 2021 RfC outcome was that the 5% rule is "the standard infobox inclusion threshold for all elections" (bolding for emphasis) although "appropriate exceptions may be made via local consensus". I'm not sure what relevance MOS:INFOBOX has here, as it doesn't say anything contradictory to the 5% rule. If you don't think the RfC outcome is valid, I would suggest asking for clarification somewhere like WP:AN.
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
.svg){kind=link}