This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This template is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
I'm not sure what you mean when asking if anybody cares about this template, but it is widely used. It was also the subject of a deletion discussion, linked from the top of this page, and was kept following that discussion. --auburnpilottalk15:26, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Adding GlobalAir.com
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I would like to request that Globalair.com is added as a resource in place of AirNav. I have been using Globalair.com for some time and have found it to be much more accurate and consistent. I did some research contacting both companies and it turns out that AirNav is updated by users and pilots compared to Globalair.com which is updated by FBOS and airports. If you decide not to replace AirNav you should at least add Globalair.com as an additional resource. Thank you.
The following URL can be used for this template:
** GlobalAir [http://www.globalair.com/airport/apt.airport.aspx?aptcode={{{1}}} airport information for {{{1}}}]
We had come to the consensus to add Globalair.com to the list and it appears that it has been removed. Can we please add it back to the list. I believe it was removed because I added it to the US-airport-minor template and AuburnPilot got mad that I didn't make a comment on the talk page although consensus has already been established for main airport template.Srwikieditor (talk) 12:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Although you are correct that I object to the inclusion of this link, I assure you it has nothing to do with anger. As I've said elsewhere, I do not believe the inclusion of Global Air's website will add relevant information not found through the links already included. I will again recommend you post at the talk page of WikiProject Aviation to seek further input. --auburnpilottalk02:23, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit template-protected}} template. I'm sorry. I don't see this consensus, and since someone objects to the change, I'm going to have ask for a discussion for this addition to take place. —cyberpowerChatOnline07:40, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry the discussion was done at the WikiProject Airports and sorry for not adding it to this sand box and test cases but I just added it and would like you to take a look at it as I am not familiar with the test case process. Let me know if I did that right. Thank you. Srwikieditor (talk) 18:00, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh wow that looks completely different from what I was reading on test cases. Thank you for the information and I will make sure I do that correctly in the future. Can you take a look at it now and see if I did it correctly? Thank you very much. Srwikieditor (talk) 20:36, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I missed this. I've looked now, and since the template hasn't been fed any parameters, the links are showing with {{{1}}} inside them. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:44, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see a consensus to make a change, add or remove. It seems that it's mostly the work of a single editor that has no other purpose on wikipedia except to add Globalair to various airports templates. Is there a COI going on here? FWIW, I have no COI in this matter. --Dual Freq (talk) 21:50, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This link has been on the template then was randomly removed. Please re add to the template. I think there should of been a consensus before it was removed. Srwikieditor (talk) 23:07, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now: per the above discussion until COI is determined one way or the other and the sandbox and testcases pages reflect the exact change(s), if any, as determined by consensus. – Painius03:15, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
New template revision with more HTTPS external links in sandbox
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
The purpose of this edit is to provide increased privacy and security for users by having the template use HTTPS for certain external links. Please adjust the template so that its content matches this sandbox revision. (View the diff between the template and the sandbox revision.)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Replace this line: ** NOAA/NWS [http://www.crh.noaa.gov/data/obhistory/K{{{1}}}.html latest weather observations]
With this line: ** NOAA/NWS weather observations: [https://tgftp.nws.noaa.gov/weather/current/K{{{1}}}.html current], [https://w1.weather.gov/data/obhistory/K{{{1}}}.html past three days]
Explanation of issue:
Current external link for weather is broken.
This change will replace the broken link with two working links (one link for current weather and one link for weather observations over the past three days).
This change was previously implemented at {{US-airport-ga}}.
DoneMilborneOne, while I don't disagree with your assessment of the validity of the included links, the request itself is simply replacing a broken link with a live one (and thus I have no real reason to turn down the request). You're welcome to start a new discussion if you feel the line should be removed entirely. Primefac (talk) 00:53, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
