Template talk:The Colbert Report

	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Comedy This template is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Off-balanced

The template looks awful as it is now off-balanced. Reducing the width eliminates the awkward blank space. -- Wikipedical 19:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on what monitor, tex size, and screen settings you are using. From my monitor, the template's original width looks as good (if not better) than the new width.--TBCTaLk?!? 19:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a new width though. It has been centered at 30% since it was created. I increased it to 30.5% to incorporate 'wikiality,' so it's not that much of a "new width." -- Wikipedical 20:39, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since the List of Neologisms is redirected...

I'm going to go ahead and change its link to the apparent new home of the list inside the Truthiness article. Since we have a redirect at its current link i feel this is a better link for the time being until we figure out if we want the list to have its own page or not. MrMacMan 19:28, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As that section of Truthiness no longer seems to exist, I simply removed the link from the template. -- Kicking222 15:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tek Jansen

Stephen Colbert's Alpha Squad Seven, Can't this be added on to there? Oringe 02:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Internal link to Wikiality

Someone may wish to add a link to Wikiality to the template once it is unprotected. Absolon S. Kent 23:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't move this template without consensus

I don't know why it was moved. As it is the template for the show, it should keep the same name as the show. --Muboshgu (talk) 20:38, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]