This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Ubcule-2015-11-19T13:22:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Merged_Science_of_Cambridge_and_Sinclair_Research_rows-2015-11-19T13:22:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ubcule-2015-11-19T13:22:00.000Z-Merged_Science_of_Cambridge_and_Sinclair_Research_rows"],"text":"Merged Science of Cambridge and Sinclair Research rows","linkableTitle":"Merged Science of Cambridge and Sinclair Research rows"}-->
Merged Science of Cambridge and Sinclair Research rows
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Ubcule-2015-11-19T13:22:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Merged_Science_of_Cambridge_and_Sinclair_Research_rows-2015-11-19T13:22:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ubcule-2015-11-19T13:22:00.000Z-Merged_Science_of_Cambridge_and_Sinclair_Research_rows"],"text":"Merged Science of Cambridge and Sinclair Research rows","linkableTitle":"Merged Science of Cambridge and Sinclair Research rows"}-->
I've merged the Science of Cambridge and Sinclair Research rows. Both were the same company/entity, with the former merely being an earlier name. I feel that the distinction is contrived, somewhat misleading (since it implies more separateness than there was) and pointless, but if anyone wants to put the case otherwise, I'd be interested to hear it!
Ubcule (talk) 13:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-19T13:22:00.000Z","author":"Ubcule","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ubcule-2015-11-19T13:22:00.000Z-Merged_Science_of_Cambridge_and_Sinclair_Research_rows","replies":[]}}-->
