Template talk:Rembrandt

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Visual arts This template is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles Netherlands This template falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Why has this template now attracted links to content in sister projects? I think all of that should be removed. We need only one link to Wikimedia Commons. Links to dozens of files is inappropriate and not how this template is meant to function. The addition of "Eponyms and recognitions" is ridiculous and needs to go, too. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-11-30T13:32:00.000Z","author":"Chris troutman","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Chris_troutman-2016-11-30T13:32:00.000Z-too_many_links","replies":["c-Haploidavey-2016-11-30T13:53:00.000Z-Chris_troutman-2016-11-30T13:32:00.000Z","c-Johnbod-2016-12-10T03:43:00.000Z-Chris_troutman-2016-11-30T13:32:00.000Z"]}}-->

Agreed. Over-enthusistic and inappropriate linking has made it a near-illegible, impractical mess. Haploidavey (talk) 13:53, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-11-30T13:53:00.000Z","author":"Haploidavey","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Haploidavey-2016-11-30T13:53:00.000Z-Chris_troutman-2016-11-30T13:32:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Agreed. Johnbod (talk) 03:43, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-12-10T03:43:00.000Z","author":"Johnbod","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Johnbod-2016-12-10T03:43:00.000Z-Chris_troutman-2016-11-30T13:32:00.000Z","replies":["c-Robsinden-2017-07-20T09:11:00.000Z-Johnbod-2016-12-10T03:43:00.000Z"]}}-->

I've had a bit of a re-structure and a trim. I think the people could be trimmed further. Only people who are defined by their relationship with Rembrandt should be included. --Rob Sinden (talk) 09:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-07-20T09:11:00.000Z","author":"Robsinden","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Robsinden-2017-07-20T09:11:00.000Z-Johnbod-2016-12-10T03:43:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Rob Sinden"}}-->