Q: When using {{convert}} why does the answer sometimes seem a bit off?
A: This template takes into account the precision of the supplied value and generally rounds the output to the same level of precision. If you need to change from the default output precision, see rounding.
Note: This can cause whole numbers that end in one or more zeroes to be converted less accurately than expected.
Q: What are all the possible units (kg, lb, m, cm, ft, in, °C, °F, km, mi, nmi, mph, km/h, and so on)?
Q: I've been using Convert for some time and am pretty comfortable with its basic features. Does it have other features which it would be worth my while to learn about?
Template:Convert is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.
I request that we enhance the module to include lakhs and crores.
The Indian numbering system is the main nomenclature used in South Asia to name large numbers. From the lead:
The terms lakh or 1,00,000 (one hundred thousand, written as 100,000 in Pakistan, and outside the Indian subcontinent) and crore or 1,00,00,000 (ten million, written as 10,000,000 outside the subcontinent) are the most commonly used terms in Indian English to express large numbers in the system.
This is a dimensionless unit, or if you wish, the units are integers. (Hence if implemented, the data item in 'all_units' at Module:Convert/data could be named ["ins"] for 'Indian numbering system'). Note also the main pattern of comma-separation into groups of two and three digits, not just three.
These terms should be converted to standard English terms, mostly with the term million, except for values up to 9 lakh, which could be 900,000. Sample usage in articles:
The template sees 3 zeroes at the end and assumes that is the amount of rounding desired. Ie 8000 nmi +/- 500 nmi. It is not assuming 8000 nmi +/- 0.5 nmi. Therefore it rounds the output to a similar amount.
However, you can control the rounding. Eg:
{{cvt|8000|nmi|km|0}} gives 8,000 nmi (14,816 km) (probably not appropriate if the 8000 is a round number)
{{cvt|8000|nmi|km|-1}} gives 8,000 nmi (14,820 km)
{{cvt|8000|nmi|km|-2}} gives 8,000 nmi (14,800 km)
{{cvt|8000|nmi|km|-3}} gives 8,000 nmi (15,000 km) (probably the most appropriate if the 8000 is a round number)
Can we please get suf1 and suff2 parameters added to this template, like done at Template:Change, so that we can add references or notes to the first and second numbers in the template, respectively? Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 20:10, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The purpose of convert is to take a single number and convert it into the equivalent in different units of measurement. All numbers displayed come from that single input. So why would we need a second reference?
Likewise, why would we have different notes for each unit of measurement? Surely a single reference and/or note cover all the units used. Can you give an example? Stepho talk23:42, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good point re: single input. Rather, a suffix parameter is desired just for after the first number because it is the one that can be sourced, whereas the second is a product of the template. Same with notes being based on the first number. See the Flin Flon and Lloydminster rows at List of cities in Saskatchewan#List. In those two cases, I want the notes to be displayed after the first number, not after the second (conversion) number as currently shown. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 00:29, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, this only applies to tables. The |pre= option (with the ref as the next field) can be twisted into doing what you want. {{convert|2.01|km2|sqmi|disp=table|sortable=on|adj=pre|<ref group=SK>col1 note</ref>}} gives:
I suppose so but after all these years without it, I wonder if a new unit would be much benefit. Would cmil be used in any other articles or would it only be used for the approximate values shown in this article? Any thoughts from watchers? Johnuniq (talk) 00:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
