Template talk:Bewitched
Fishy summary in Template historyAs this (what I am wrting write now) is the first entry in the talk page, where is this "consensus" referred to below (copied from the template's history)? (cur) (prev) 23:25, 16 December 2009 Bovineboy2008 (talk | contribs) (223 bytes) (remove cast/crew per consensus) (undo) Very fishy. Njsustain (talk) 07:28, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
With all due respect, there was not consensus for the original change. There is a reasonable number of names in the list, so it has been restored. It is not bloated, nor padded. The admitted "trigger happy" attempt to delete this template altogether shows that there was not objectivity in that change. Please do not delete again unless a consensus (i.e. more people on this discussion page) come to an agreement about a valid reason to make such a change.Njsustain (talk) 16:17, 19 December 2009 (UTC) --Well, I hope your concience is cleared by asking me to join a discussion which you had absolutely no interest in taking seriously. You refuse to accept that others have a different opinion and insist that others are "edit warring" while you are doing the same exact thing. Congratulations on winning the edit war, WP bully.Njsustain (talk) 19:07, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia