Teleology in biology is the use of the language of goal-directedness in accounts of evolutionaryadaptation, which some biologists and philosophers of science find problematic. The term teleonomy has also been proposed. Before Darwin, organisms were seen as existing because God had designed and created them; their features such as eyes were taken by natural theology to have been made to enable them to carry out their functions, such as seeing. Evolutionary biologists often use similar teleological formulations that invoke purpose, but these imply natural selection rather than actual goals, whether conscious or not. Some biologists and religious thinkers held that evolution itself was somehow goal-directed (orthogenesis), and in vitalist versions, driven by a purposeful life force. With evolution working by natural selection acting on inherited variation, the use of teleology in biology has attracted criticism, and attempts have been made to teach students to avoid teleological language.
Phrases used by biologists like "a function of ... is to ..." or "is designed for" are teleological at least in language. The presence of real or apparent teleology in explanations of natural selection is a controversial aspect of the philosophy of biology, not least for its echoes of natural theology.[1][7]
Before Darwin, natural theology both assumed the existence of God and used the appearance of function in nature to argue for the existence of God.[9][10] The English parson-naturalistJohn Ray stated that his intention was "to illustrate the glory of God in the knowledge of the works of nature or creation".[8] Natural theology presented forms of the teleological argument or argument from design, namely that organs functioned well for their apparent purpose, so they were well-designed, so they must have been designed by a benevolent creator. For example, the eye had the function of seeing, and contained features like the iris and lens that assisted with seeing; therefore, ran the argument, it had been designed for that purpose.[9][10][11]
A trait which persists in a population is often assumed by biologists to have been selected for in the course of evolution, raising the question of how the trait achieves this. Biologists call any such mechanism the function of the trait, using phrases like "A function of stotting by antelopes is to communicate to predators that they have been detected",[1] or "The primatehand is designed (by natural selection) for grasping."[25]
An adaptation is an observable structure or other feature of an organism (for example, an enzyme) generated by natural selection to serve its current function. A biologist might propose the hypothesis that feathers are adaptations for bird flight. That would require three things: that the trait of having feathers is heritable; that the trait does serve the function of flight; and that the trait increases the fitness of the organisms that have it. Feathers clearly meet these three conditions in living birds. However, there is also a historical question, namely, did the trait arise at the same time as bird flight? Unfortunately for the hypothesis, this seems not to be so: theropoddinosaurs had feathers, but many of them did not fly.[26][27] Feathers can be described as an exaptation, having been co-opted for flight but having evolved earlier for another purpose such as insulation. Biologists may describe both the co-option and the earlier adaptation in teleological language.[26][28][29]
Apparent teleology is a recurring issue in evolutionary biology,[30] much to the consternation of some writers,[31] and as an explanatory style it remains controversial.[31] There are various reasons for discomfort with teleology among biologists.[1][32]
Firstly, the concept of adaptation is itself controversial, as it can be taken to imply, as the evolutionary biologists Stephen J. Gould and Richard Lewontin argued, that biologists agree with Voltaire's Doctor Pangloss in his 1759 satire Candide that this is "the best of all possible worlds", in other words that every trait is perfectly suited to its functions.[33] However, all that evolutionary biology requires is the weaker claim that one trait is at least slightly better in a certain context than another, and hence is selected for.[1]
The watchmaker analogy argues that the presence of a complex mechanism like a watch implies the existence of a conscious designer.
Thirdly, attributing purposes to adaptations risks confusion with popular forms of Lamarckism where animals in particular have been supposed to influence their own evolution through their intentions, though Lamarck himself spoke rather of habits of use, and the belief that his thinking was teleological has been challenged.[37][38][39]
Fourthly, the teleological explanation of adaptation is uncomfortable because it seems to require backward causation, in which existing traits are explained by future outcomes; because it seems to attribute the action of a conscious mind when none is assumed to be present in an organism; and because, as a result, adaptation looks impossible to test empirically.[1]
A fifth reason concerns students rather than researchers: Gonzalez Galli argues that since people naturally imagine that evolution has a purpose or direction, then the use of teleological language by scientists may act as an obstacle to students when learning about natural selection. Such language, he argues, should be removed to make teaching more effective.[40]
Removable teleological shorthand
Statements which imply that nature has goals, for example where a species is said to do something "in order to" achieve survival, appear teleological, and therefore invalid to evolutionary biologists. It is however usually possible to rewrite such sentences to avoid the apparent teleology. Some biology courses have incorporated exercises requiring students to rephrase such sentences so that they do not read teleologically. Nevertheless, biologists still frequently write in a way which can be read as implying teleology, even though that is not their intention.[41] John Reiss argues that evolutionary biology can be purged of apparent teleology by rejecting the pre-Darwinian watchmaker analogy for natural selection;[41][42] other arguments against this analogy have also been promoted by writers such as the evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins.[43]
Some philosophers of biology such as James G. Lennox have argued that Darwin was a teleologist,[44] while others like Michael Ghiselin described this claim as a myth promoted by misinterpretations of his discussions, and emphasized the distinction between using teleological metaphors and actually being teleological.[45] Michael Heads, on the other hand, describes a change in Darwin's thinking about evolution that can be traced from the first volume of On the Origin of Species to later volumes. For Heads, Darwin was originally a far more teleological thinker, but over time, "learned to avoid teleology." Heads cites a letter Darwin wrote in 1872, in which he downplayed the role of natural selection as a causal force on its own in explaining biological adaptation, and instead gave more weight to "laws of growth," that operate [without the aid of natural selection].[46]
Various commentators view the teleological phrases used in modern evolutionary biology as a type of shorthand for describing any function which offers an evolutionary advantage through natural selection. For example, the zoologist S. H. P. Madrell wrote that "the proper but cumbersome way of describing change by evolutionary adaptation [may be] substituted by shorter overtly teleological statements" for the sake of saving space, but that this "should not be taken to imply that evolution proceeds by anything other than from mutations arising by chance, with those that impart an advantage being retained by natural selection."[48]
Irreducible teleology
Other philosophers of biology argue instead that biological teleology is irreducible, and cannot be removed by any simple process of rewording. Francisco Ayala specified three separate situations in which teleological explanations are appropriate. First, if the agent consciously anticipates the goal of their own action; for example the behavior of picking up a pen can be explained by reference to the agent's desire to write. Ayala extends this type of teleological explanation to non-human animals by noting that A deer running away from a mountain lion. . . has at least the appearance of purposeful behavior."[49] Second, teleological explanations are useful for systems that have a mechanism for self-regulation despite fluctuations in environment; for example, the self-regulation of body temperature in animals. Finally, they are appropriate "in reference to structures anatomically and physiologically designed to perform a certain function. "[49]
Ayala, relying on work done by the philosopher Ernest Nagel, also rejects the idea that teleological arguments are inadmissible because they cannot be causal. For Nagel, teleological arguments must be consistent because they can always be reformulated as non-teleological arguments. The difference between the two is, for Ayala, merely one of emphasis. Nagel writes that while teleological arguments focus on "the consequences for a given system of a constituent part or process," the equivalent non-teleological arguments focus on ""some of the conditions ... under which the system persists in its characteristic organization and activities."[50] However, Francisco Ayala argued that teleological statements are more explanatory and cannot be disposed of.[51][52]Karen Neander similarly argued that the modern concept of biological 'function' depends on natural selection. So, for example, it is not possible to say that anything that simply winks into existence, without going through a process of selection, actually has functions. We decide whether an appendage has a function by analysing the process of selection that led to it. Therefore, Neander argues, any talk of functions must be posterior to natural selection, function must be defined by reference to the history of a species, and teleology cannot be avoided.[53] The evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr likewise stated that "adaptedness ... is an a posteriori result rather than an a priori goal-seeking."[37]
Angela Breitenbach, from a Kantian perspective, argues in Kant Yearbook that teleology in biology is important as "a heuristic in the search for causal explanations of nature and ... an inevitable analogical perspective on living beings." In her view of Kant, teleology implies something that cannot be explained by science, but only understood through analogy.[54]
Colin Pittendrigh coined the similar term 'teleonomy' for apparently goal-directed biological phenomena. For Pittendrigh, the notion of 'adaptation' in biology, however it is defined, necessarily "connote that aura of design, purpose, or end-directedness, which has, since the time of Aristotle, seemed to characterize the living thing" [55] This association with Aristotle, however, is problematic, because it meant that the study of adaptation would inevitably be bound up with teleological explanations. Pittendrigh sought to preserve the aspect of design and purpose in biological systems, while denying that this design can be understood as a causal principle. The confusion, he says, would be removed if we described these systems "by some other term, like 'teleonomic,' in order to emphasize that the recognition and description of end-directedness does not carry a commitment to Aristotelian teleology as an efficient causal principle."[56]Ernst Mayr criticised Pittendrigh's confusion of Aristotle's four causes, arguing that evolution only involved the material and formal but not the efficient cause.[b] Mayr proposed to use the term only for "systems operating on the basis of a program of coded information."[57]
William C. Wimsatt affirmed that the teleologicality of the language of biology and other fields derives from the logical structure of their background theories, and not merely from the use of teleological locutions such as "function" and "in order to". He stated that "To replace talk about function by talk about selection [...] is not to eliminate teleology but to rephrase it". However, Wimsatt argues that this thought does not mean an appeal to backwards causation, vitalism, entelechy, or anti-reductionist sentiments.[58]
The biologist J. B. S. Haldane observed that "Teleology is like a mistress to a biologist: he cannot live without her but he's unwilling to be seen with her in public."[59][60]
^ abArmstrong, Patrick (2000). The English Parson-Naturalist. Gracewing. p. 46. ISBN978-0-85244-516-7.
^ abAyala, Francisco J. (2006). "Review of 'The Blasphemy of Intelligent Design: Creationism's Trojan Horse. The Wedge of Intelligent Design' by Barbara Forrest; Paul R. Gross". History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. 28 (3): 409–421. JSTOR23334140.
^Barbieri, Marcello. (2013). Biosemiotics: Information, Codes and Signs in Living Systems. Nova Science Publishers. p. 7. ISBN978-1-60021-612-1
^Jacobsen, Eric Paul. (2005). From Cosmology to Ecology: The Monist World-view in Germany from 1770 to 1930. p. 100. Peter Lang. ISBN978-0-8204-7231-7
^Bowler, Peter J. (1992). The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades around 1900. The Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 116–117. ISBN978-0-8018-4391-4
^Simpson, George Gaylord. (1964). Evolutionary Theology: The New Mysticism. In This View of Life: The World of an Evolutionist. Harcourt, Brace & World. pp. 213–233
^Lane, David H. (1996). The Phenomenon of Teilhard: Prophet for a New Age. Mercer University Press. pp. 60–64. ISBN0-86554-498-0.
^De Chardin, Pierre Teilhard. (2003, reprint edition). The Human Phenomenon. Sussex Academic Press. p. 65. ISBN1-902210-30-1
^Levinton, Jeffrey S. (2001). Genetics, Paleontology, and Macroevolution. Cambridge University Press. pp. 14–16. ISBN0-521-80317-9
^Montgomery, Georgina M.; Largent, Mark A. (2015). A Companion to the History of American Science. Wiley. p. 218. ISBN978-1-4051-5625-7 "With the integration of Mendelian genetics and population genetics into evolutionary theory in the 1930s a new generation of biologists applied mathematical techniques to investigate how changes in the frequency of genes in populations combined with natural selection could produce species change. This demonstrated that Darwinian natural selection was the primary mechanism for evolution and that other models of evolution, such as neo-Lamarckism and orthogenesis, were invalid."
^"Primates – marmosets, monkeys, apes, lemurs, humans". NHPTV. Retrieved 28 July 2016. The hands and feet of all primates, except for humans, are designed for grasping. Humans have hands designed for grasping, but not feet! Humans have opposable thumbs.
^Bednarczyk, A (2009), "[Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck (1744-1829). A dispute on the mechanism of evolution. On the bicentenary of the publication of Philosophie Zoologique (1809)]", Kwartalnik Historii Nauki I Techniki (in Polish), 54 (3–4): 31–98, ISSN0023-589X, PMID20481104
^Heads, Michael (June 2009). "Darwin's changing views on evolution: from centres of origin and teleology to vicariance and incomplete lineage sorting". Journal of Biogeography. 36 (6): 1018–1026. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02127.x. ISSN0305-0270.
^Madrell, S.H.P. (1998). "Why are there no insects in the open sea?". The Journal of Experimental Biology. 201 (17): 2461–2464. doi:10.1242/jeb.201.17.2461. PMID9698580.
^Ayala, Francisco (1998). "Teleological explanations in evolutionary biology". In Allen, Colin; Bekoff, Marc (eds.). Nature's purposes: Analyses of Function and Design in Biology. The MIT Press. ISBN978-0262510974.
^Neander, Karen (1998). "Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst's Defense," in C. Allen, M. Bekoff & G. Lauder (Eds.), Nature's Purposes: Analyses of Function and Design in Biology (pp. 313–333). The MIT Press.
^Angel, J. Lawrence (June 1961). "Behavior and evolution. By Anne Roe and George G. Simpson, eds. vii + 557 pp. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1958". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 19 (2): 218–219. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330190215. ISSN0002-9483.
Laconi LàconiKomuneComune di LaconiLokasi Laconi di Provinsi OristanoNegaraItaliaWilayah SardiniaProvinsiOristano (OR)Pemerintahan • Wali kotaAnna Paola ZacchedduLuas • Total124,75 km2 (48,17 sq mi)Ketinggian555 m (1,821 ft)Populasi (2016) • Total1,878[1]Zona waktuUTC+1 (CET) • Musim panas (DST)UTC+2 (CEST)Kode pos08034Kode area telepon0782Situs webhttp://www.comune.laconi.or.it Laconi (bahasa Sardinia: Làcon…
Darr: A Violent Love StoryडरڈرPosterSutradaraYash ChopraProduserYash ChopraDitulis olehHoney IraniJaved SiddiquiPemeranSunny DeolShahrukh Khan Juhi ChawlaAnupam KherDilip TahilPenata musikShiv-HariSinematograferManmohan SinghPenyuntingKeshav NaiduDistributorYash Raj FilmsTanggal rilis 24 Desember 1993 (1993-12-24) Durasi177 minutesNegaraIndiaBahasaHindiPendapatankotor₹20 crore (setara dengan ₹103 crore atau US$14 juta pada tahun 2023)[1] Darr: A Vio…
Державний комітет телебачення і радіомовлення України (Держкомтелерадіо) Приміщення комітетуЗагальна інформаціяКраїна УкраїнаДата створення 2003Керівне відомство Кабінет Міністрів УкраїниРічний бюджет 1 964 898 500 ₴[1]Голова Олег НаливайкоПідвідомчі орг…
此條目需要补充更多来源。 (2021年7月4日)请协助補充多方面可靠来源以改善这篇条目,无法查证的内容可能會因為异议提出而被移除。致使用者:请搜索一下条目的标题(来源搜索:美国众议院 — 网页、新闻、书籍、学术、图像),以检查网络上是否存在该主题的更多可靠来源(判定指引)。 美國眾議院 United States House of Representatives第118届美国国会众议院徽章 众议院旗帜…
Spanish association football player For the American fencer, see Gerard Moreno (fencer). In this Spanish name, the first or paternal surname is Moreno and the second or maternal family name is Balagueró. Gerard Moreno Gerard with Spain in 2019Personal informationFull name Gerard Moreno Balagueró[1]Date of birth (1992-04-07) 7 April 1992 (age 32)[1]Place of birth Santa Perpètua, SpainHeight 1.80 m (5 ft 11 in)[1]Position(s) StrikerTeam inform…
A sack-back Windsor armchair by Wallace Nutting A Windsor chair is a chair built with a solid wooden seat into which the chair-back and legs are round-tenoned, or pushed into drilled holes, in contrast to other styles of chairs whose back legs and back uprights are continuous. The seats of Windsor chairs are often carved into a shallow dish or saddle shape for comfort. Traditionally, the legs, stretchers, and uprights (or spindles) were usually turned on a pole lathe. Spindles may also be carved…
1990 studio album by EPMDBusiness as UsualStudio album by EPMDReleasedDecember 18, 1990GenreGolden age hip hopLength51:18Label Def Jam Rush Columbia ProducerEPMD, DJ ScratchEPMD chronology Unfinished Business(1989) Business as Usual(1990) Business Never Personal(1992) Singles from Business as Usual Gold DiggerReleased: November 14, 1990 RampageReleased: February 26, 1991 Give the PeopleReleased: June 13, 1991 Professional ratingsReview scoresSourceRatingAllMusic[1]Entertainment W…
King of Tyre Hiram IKing of TyreReign980–947 BC (?)PredecessorAbibaal, ?? – 981 BC (?)SuccessorBaal-Eser I (Beleazarus I, Ba'l-mazzer I) 946–930 BC (?)Born1000 BC (?)Tyre, presumedDied947 or 946 BC, presumedDynastyDynasty of Abibaal and Hiram IFatherAbibaalMotherUnknown Hiram I (Phoenician: 𐤇𐤓𐤌 Ḥirōm my brother is exalted, Hebrew: חירם Ḥīrām, Modern Arabic: حيرام, also called Hirom or Huram)[1] was the Phoenician king of Tyre according to the hebrew B…
مات ديمون (بالإنجليزية: Matt Damon) ديمون في العرض الأول لفيلم المريخي في مهرجان تورونتو السينمائي الدولي 2015. معلومات شخصية اسم الولادة ماثيو بيغ ديمون الميلاد 8 أكتوبر 1970 (العمر 53 سنة)كامبريدج، ماساتشوستس، الولايات المتحدة الإقامة لوس أنجلوس، كاليفورنيا، الولايات المتحدة الج…
Northern Irish politician For other people named William Craig, see William Craig (disambiguation). William CraigLeader of the Vanguard Unionist Progressive PartyIn officeFebruary 1972 – February 1978Member of Parliamentfor Belfast EastIn office28 February 1974 – 7 April 1979Preceded byStanley McMasterSucceeded byPeter Robinson Personal detailsBorn(1924-12-02)2 December 1924Cookstown, Northern IrelandDied25 April 2011(2011-04-25) (aged 86)Bangor, Northern IrelandNation…
Сергій Олексійович Міщенко Головний сержантЗагальна інформаціяНародження 21 травня 1974(1974-05-21)м. Зіньків, Зіньківський район, Полтавська область, УРСР, СРСРСмерть 1 грудня 2022(2022-12-01) (48 років)с. Ковалівка, Сватівський район, Луганська область, Україна(загинув у бою)Псевдо Б…
British cavalry officer (1685–1768) Sir Robert Rich, BtPortrait by William AikmanBorn3 July 1685Roos Hall, Beccles, Suffolk, EnglandDied1 February 1768 (aged 82)Roos Hall, Beccles, Suffolk, Great BritainAllegiance Kingdom of England Kingdom of Great BritainService/branch English Army British ArmyYears of service1700–1768RankField MarshalBattles/warsWar of the Spanish SuccessionWar of the Austrian Succession Field Marshal Sir Robert Rich, 4th Baronet (3 July 1685 – …
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: List of Huguenots – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2022) (Learn how and when to remove thi…
Nabugih foja Melipotes carolae Status konservasiRisiko rendahIUCN22735330 TaksonomiDivisiManiraptoriformesKelasAvesOrdoEupasseresSuperfamiliMeliphagoideaFamiliMeliphagidaeGenusMelipotesSpesiesMelipotes carolae Beehler, 2007 Nabugih foja ( Melipotes carolae ) adalah spesies pemakan madu dengan bulu abu-abu jelaga dan paruh hitam. [2] Ciri yang paling khas bisa dibilang adalah kulit wajah yang luas berwarna oranye kemerahan dan pial yang menjuntai. Pada anggota genus Melipotes lainnya, bag…
← 1948 1947 1946 1949 في السعودية → 1950 1951 1952 عقود: طالع أيضاً:أحداث أخرى في 1949تاريخ السعودية تحتوي هذه المقالة على أهم الأحداث التي شهدتها السعودية في 1949، إضافة إلى أهم الشخصيات السعودية التي وُلدت أو تُوفيت في هذه السنة. السياسة الحكم الملك: عبد العزيز بن عبد الرحمن آل سعود تعيينات ت…
Si ce bandeau n'est plus pertinent, retirez-le. Cliquez ici pour en savoir plus. Cet article ne cite pas suffisamment ses sources (mai 2018). Si vous disposez d'ouvrages ou d'articles de référence ou si vous connaissez des sites web de qualité traitant du thème abordé ici, merci de compléter l'article en donnant les références utiles à sa vérifiabilité et en les liant à la section « Notes et références ». En pratique : Quelles sources sont attendues ? Comment …
Германская колониальная империя †нем. Deutsche Kolonien und Schutzgebiete На этой почтовой марке Германской Восточной Африки стоит надпечатка 10 пеза и оттиск почтового штемпеля Танга (1893) Первые почтовые марки Стандартная 1893 Карта Германской империи и её колоний (помечены соответств…