Powered air-purifying respirator

For the full-body lab garment with similar purpose, see Positive pressure personnel suit.

Powered air-purifying respirator
A powered air-purifying respirator with a belt-pack filter-blower that feeds air to the elastomeric mask.
Other name(s)PAPR
Regulated byNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Regulation42 CFR 84
NIOSH scheduleTC-21C
A PAPR, gown, and biosafety cabinet in use in a BSL-3 laboratory. All parts of the PAPR are visible: the waist unit holding the fan, filter, and battery; the hose; and the mask, in this case a flexible, loose-fitting one.

A powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) is a type of respirator used to safeguard workers against contaminated air. PAPRs consist of a headgear-and-fan assembly that takes ambient air contaminated with one or more type of pollutant or pathogen, actively removes (filters) a sufficient proportion of these hazards, and then delivers the clean air to the user's face or mouth and nose. They have a higher assigned protection factor than filtering facepiece respirators such as N95 masks. PAPRs are sometimes called positive-pressure masks, blower units, or just blowers.

Description

The modularity of PAPRs allows them to be customized for different working environments. Regardless of type, a PAPR consists of:[1]

  • some kind of headgear (mask or hood),
  • a powered (motor-driven) fan which forces incoming air into the device,
  • a filter (or multiple filters) for delivery to the user for breathing, and
  • a battery or other power source.

The mask may be hard and tight-fitting, or flexible and loose-fitting. The former affords a higher level of protection, but is less comfortable.[2] Tight-fitting PAPRs require a fit test in hazardous workplace environments, while loose-fitting PAPR users can avoid OSHA fit test requirements in certain hazardous workplace environments (see OSHA's respirator assigned protection factors for more information). Loose-fitting PAPRs can be useful when a fit test for a tight-fitting respirator cannot be successfully passed, for example when facial hair is present.[2][3] Masks may be reusable or disposable. Some masks allow the full face to be seen by others, aiding in interpersonal communication.[1]

PAPRs have low breathing resistance, unlike filtering facepiece respirators such as N95 masks.[3] A PAPR may have adjustable air flow rates for added comfort.[1] While they are often referred to as positive pressure masks, they are not true positive-pressure devices as overbreathing can overcome the pressure supplied by the fan.[4]

Filters

PAPRs may be outfitted with mechanical filters for atmospheres with particulate contamination, with a chemical cartridge for atmospheres with toxic gases or vapors, or both in combination.[5] PAPRs can provide an assigned protection factor between 25 and 1000 depending on the type, as compared to an N95 mask's assigned protection factor of 10.[2][3] When comparing various makes and models of PAPR, the supporting documentation from each of the respective manufacturers should be consulted in order to confirm the APF value of each product.[6]

In the United States, HE (high-efficiency) filters are the main class of particulate filter used with PAPRs. These are 99.97% efficient against 0.3 micron particles, the same as a P100 filter.[1][7][8] PAPR HE filters used in industry are generally re-used until they are soiled, damaged, or reduce PAPR air flow below specified levels. In healthcare settings involving a live virus, CDC recommends that a practical replacement cycle be implemented.[1]

Regulatory requirements

42 CFR 84

Further information: NIOSH air filtration rating

42 CFR 84, from 1995 to 2020, copies 30 CFR 11 rules for PAPRs.[9]

The following table lists the air flow requirements for NIOSH-approved PAPRs under Part 84.175. Tight-fitting PAPRs may be fit tested with the facepiece unpowered and in negative-pressure (under 29 CFR 1910.134) while loose-fitting PAPR fit test protocols have not been changed from 30 CFR 11.[10]

Part 84 air flow requirements
Facepiece Air flow in
liters/minute
Tight-fitting 115
Loose-fitting 170

The following table lists the ratings for particulate ratings for Part 84 PAPRs.[10] PAPR100 ratings were added in 2020.[11]

NIOSH particulate classes for powered air-purifying respirators
Particulate Respirator
class 		Minimum
efficiency level 		Permitted for
TB 		Permitted for
asbestos[12]
0.3 micron DOP HEPA or HE 99.97% Yes Yes
0.075 to 1.86 micron NaCl PAPR100-N Rating
discontinued 		Not yet
defined
0.075 to 1.86 micron DOP PAPR100-P

PAPR100-N is not designed to filter oil particulates, and the official color-coding for all three respirator types is magenta.[10]

Usage

This full-face mask has an inner orinasal mask to reduce dead space, and, since it is being used against asbestos, exhalation valves (white). The hose connects to a PAPR filter-pump.

According to the NIOSH Respirator Selection Logic, PAPRs are recommended for concentrations of hazardous particulates or gases that are greater than the relevant occupational exposure limit but less than the immediately dangerous to life or health (IDLH) level and the manufacturer's maximum-use concentration, subject to the respirator having a sufficient assigned protection factor. For substances hazardous to the eyes, a respirator equipped with a full facepiece, helmet, or hood is recommended. PAPRs are not effective during firefighting, in an oxygen-deficient atmosphere, or in an unknown atmosphere; in these situations a self-contained breathing apparatus or supplied-air respirator is recommended instead.[5]

PAPRs have the advantage of eliminating breathing resistance caused by unpowered negative-pressure respirators such as N95 masks. This makes them usable by persons who are medically disqualified from negative-pressure respirators.[3] Loose-fitting PAPRs may also be selected for people who cannot pass a fit test due to facial hair or other reasons.[2][3] PAPRs have disadvantages in terms of ergonomic impacts, and they restrict peripheral vision.[2]

In healthcare

Because they provide higher assigned protection factors, PAPRs are suitable for use during aerosol-generating procedures[1] and by hospital first receivers.[1][13] In healthcare settings, CDC recommends cleaning of all components except the filter after each use; care must be taken to select PAPRs that are not damaged or deteriorate due to cleaning and disinfecting agents.[14][1]

Racal suits consist of a PAPR combined with a separate protective suit. They are used in healthcare settings, in this case by the U.S. Army Aeromedical Isolation Team at Fort Detrick, Maryland

In healthcare, a product known as the Racal suit can be used, consisting of a plastic suit and a PAPR fitted with HEPA filters. They were used by the U.S. Army Aeromedical Isolation Team to perform medical evacuations of patients with highly infectious diseases.[15][16]

For CBRN defense

A PAPR is certified for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear contaminants (CBRN)

Some PAPRs have special certification for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear contaminants (CBRN). In the United States, they must be certified to resist permeation of chemical warfare agents, which may involve additional protective coverings; that gas or vapor will not pass through the filter before a specified amount of time; and its ability to fit a wide range of facial sizes and shapes.[17]

Under immediately dangerous to life or health (IDLH) conditions, tight‐fitting full facepiece gas mask respirators with canisters (those with "14G approval") with CBRN approval may be used for escape, but loose‐fitting hoods and cartridges (those with "23C approval") with CBRN approval may not. Neither may be used to enter an IDLH atmosphere. The 23C CBRN PAPRs also must not be used if liquid droplet exposure occurs.[17]

See also

Wikisource has original text related to this article:
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Powered air-purifying respirators.

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h "Considerations for Optimizing the Supply of Powered Air-Purifying Respirators (PAPRs)". U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020-04-19. Retrieved 2020-05-25.
  2. ^ a b c d e Bach, Michael (2017-07-06). "Understanding respiratory protection options in healthcare: the overlooked elastomeric". NIOSH Science Blog. Retrieved 2020-04-21.
  3. ^ a b c d e Garvey, Donald J. (2010-04-01). "Constructing a Powered Air Purifying Respirator System". EHS Today. Retrieved 2020-04-21.
  4. ^ "Powered Air Purifying Respirator (PAPR)". Minnesota Department of Health. Retrieved 2020-05-25.
  5. ^ a b Bollinger, Nancy (2004-10-01). "NIOSH respirator selection logic". U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: 5–10. doi:10.26616/NIOSHPUB2005100. Retrieved 2020-04-20.
  6. ^ "Considerations for Optimizing the Supply of Powered Air-Purifying Respirators (PAPRs)". US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 11 February 2020.
  7. ^ Vanessa, Roberts (Fall 2014). "To PAPR or Not to PAPR?". Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy. 50 (3): 87–90. PMC 4456839. PMID 26078617.
  8. ^ "Understanding Respiratory Protection Against SARS". U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 2020-04-09. Retrieved 2020-05-26.
  9. ^ NIOSH Guide to the Selection and Use of Particulate Respirators Certified Under 42 CFR 84. 1996.
  10. ^ a b c "eCFR: 42 CFR Part 84". Retrieved 2024-10-07.
  11. ^ "Approval Tests and Standards for Air-Purifying Particulate Respirators". 2020-04-14.
  12. ^ 29 CFR 1910.1001(g)(3)(ii), retrieved 2024-12-14
  13. ^ "Best Practices for the Protection of Hospital-Based First Receivers from Mass Casualty Incidents Involving the Release of Hazardous Substances". U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 2005-01-01. Retrieved 2020-05-26.
  14. ^ "PAPR - Powered Air Respirators". www.envirosafetyproducts.com. Retrieved 2021-10-12.
  15. ^ "The threat to the United States from Emerging Infectious Diseases, Hearing before the Committee on International Relations, House of Representatives". 30 July 1997: 9. Retrieved 15 April 2015. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  16. ^ Sidell, Frederick R.; Takafuji, Ernest T.; Franz, David R., D.V.M. (1997). "19". Medical Aspects of Chemical and Biological Warfare. Office of The Surgeon General Department of the Army, United States of America. Retrieved 15 April 2015.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  17. ^ a b Metzler, Richard W.; Szalajda, Jonathan V. (2013-09-01). "What's special about chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) powered air-purifying respirators (PAPR)?". doi:10.26616/NIOSHPUB2013156. Retrieved 2020-05-25. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)