An Act relating to vital records; amending 63 O.S. 2021, Sections 1-311, 1-313, 1-316, and 1-321, which relate to certificates of birth; limiting biological sex designation on certificate of birth to male or female; prohibiting nonbinary designation; making language gender neutral; updating statutory language; and declaring an emergency.
Oklahoma Senate Bill 1100 (SB 1100) is a 2022 law in the state of Oklahoma which bans sex markers other than male or female on birth certificates. According to Lambda Legal, Oklahoma is the first US state to pass such a law.[1]
Background
SB 1100 was first filed in October 2021 in response to the then-ongoing court case Loreleid v. Oklahoma State Department of Health where a person born in Oklahoma had been refused a birth certificate with a non-binary gender marker by the Department of Health. The Department of Health settled the case, forcing Oklahoma to issue birth certificates with non-binary gender markers.[1][2]
Amending Oklahoma Statutes 63-1-311 (Birth certificates), 63-1-313 (Delayed birth certificate), 63-1-316 (New certificate of birth), and 63-1-321 (Amendment of certificate or record) to not allow any symbol representing a non-binary marker to be used as the biological sex designation on a birth certificate.
Declaring a state of emergency, allowing the act to take effect and come into force immediately upon approval.
Bergstrom filed the bill on October 20, 2021, before the second session of the 58th Oklahoma Legislature convened in February 2022.[7] It was found to have no fiscal considerations to the state.[8]
SB 1100 was sent to Governor Kevin Stitt on 25 April and signed the next day.[9]
Response
Support
Bergstrom said that the bill was "common sense" and that "it's not a complicated issue – biologically, you're either a male or female".[15] Dills argued that the bill provided "clarity and truth on official state documents" and that markers should be "based on established medical fact and not an ever-changing social dialogue".[16]
Nicole McAfee, executive director of Freedom Oklahoma, said that the LGBTQ+ community in Oklahoma would "continue to fight for a state where we have full equality under the law".[18] Cathryn Oakley, senior counsel with the Human Rights Campaign, said in a statement that banning non-binary birth certificates "is just another attempt to erase the identity of transgender and non-binary people" and that it went against the wishes of "the vast majority of Oklahomans".[19] The ACLU also opposed the bill.[20]
In an editorial, The Norman Transcript condemned the legislature for "[choosing] to take action it knows will harm LGBTQ+ Oklahomans" and "specifically targeting [LGBTQ+ people] and their very safe existence in our state".[21]
Legal challenges
Both before and after the bill was signed, there was discussion about its constitutionality being challenged, especially after the federal case of Zzyym v. Pompeo,[22][23] where the US Department of State was ordered to provide non-binary passports.[24][25]