Pandit M. A. Chamupati or Krishan Prashaad Prataab[2]
In May 1924, this Urdu booklet was published in Lahore. The booklet purportedly described Prophet Muhammad's relationship with women.[2]
1934
Hindu Heaven
Max Wylie
It cannot be brought into India.[3] Max Wylie, the creator The Flying Nun TV show, researched this book while teaching in Lahore.[4] The novel questioned the work of American missionaries in India.[5][6] It also dealt with the harsh effects of the climate on the missionaries.[7]
This collection of stories by Sajjad Zaheer, Ahmed Ali, Rashid Jahan and Mahmud-uz-Zafar was published in 1932. It drew protests from Muslim religious leaders.[8] In 1933, it was banned by the British colonial government.[6]
It cannot be imported into India.[3] In 1927, Gandhi wrote a review of the book titled "Drain Inspector Report" which was published in the Young India.[9]
The book cannot be imported into India.[3] The book purportedly contained stereotypes.[11]
1945
The Scented Garden: Anthropology of the Sex Life in the Levant
Bernhard Stern
This book cannot be imported into India.[12] This is a book about sexual practices and marriage rites of the people of Middle East (Levant).[13] The book was allegedly sexually explicit.[11]
1950
Pakistan-Pasmanzarwa Peshmanzar
Hameed Anwar
This book, originally in Urdu, cannot be imported into India.[12]
1950
Cease-Fire
Agha Babar
This book, originally in Urdu, cannot be imported into India.[12]
This book cannot be imported into India.[12] It was a play[16] which was a spoof of the Ramayana.[17] It was one of the first books to be banned in independent India.[16] The American edition was simply called The Ramayana.[17]
Captive Kashmir: Story of a Betrayed and Enslaved People
Aziz Beg
This book is highly critical of India's stand on Kashmir. This book cannot be imported into India.[18]
1959
The Heart of India
Alexander Campbell
This book cannot be imported into India.[18] Alexander Campbell was Time magazine's New Delhi correspondent. The book is a fictionalized and humorous account of Indian bureaucracy and economic policies.[19]
This book contains the author's experiences in India and Japan. The book was highly critical of the cultures of both nations.[20] The book was banned for its negative portrayal of Gandhi.[21]
This book cannot be imported into India.[18] The book and the movie based on it, both were banned in India.[22] The book points to the lapse in security.[11][19][23]
This book is alleged to hurt Muslim sentiments. This book cannot be imported into India.[18] The original German title was Aischa: Mohammed's Lieblingfrau (Aischa: Mohammed's Favorite Wife).[24]
This book cannot be imported into India.[26] Greville Wynne was a courier for the British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6). The book is about his involvement with Oleg Penkovsky.[27] The book was banned for purportedly misrepresenting Indian policies.[20]
Briefly banned for alleging Morarji Desai to be a CIA informer.[19] The book claimed that Morarji Desai was paid US$20,000 per year, starting from the time of Lyndon B. Johnson. Desai obtained an injunction from the Bombay High Court for a temporary ban and sued for damages worth US$5 million in US.[29]
The book dealt with India's annexation of Sikkim. The Delhi High Court had stopped its publication after a political officer station in Gangtok at the time filed a defamation suit. The book was later allowed for release.[30][31]
This book cannot be imported into India.[32] Import ban was imposed after Muslim groups protested that it was blasphemous and hurt their religious sentiments.[19] India was the first country to ban this book.[20]
Banned for purportedly mocking Islam.[19] The book has been allegedly written by a Christian evangelical group to proselytise Muslims.[20] The import of this book is strictly prohibited.[34]
A Pune court ordered the copies of the books to be destroyed in June 2014. The complaint Jaisingh More had claimed that the book was derogatory to Tukaram and Dnyaneshwar. The publishers defended the book and the author's daughter stated that they will appeal in a higher court.[35]
Statewide
This section lists books that were banned by a state government. The Section 95 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 allows the state governments to declare any publication as forfeit.[36]
Satyartha Prakash was banned in some princely states and in Sindh in 1944 and is still banned in Sindh.[37] In 2008 two Indian Muslims, Usman Ghani and Mohammad Khalil Khan of Sadar Bazar, Delhi, following the fatwa of Mufti Mukarram Ahmed, the Imam of Fatehpuri Masjid in Delhi, urged the Delhi High Court to ban Satyarth Prakash.[38] However, the court dismissed the petition and commented "A suit by Hindus against the Quran or by Muslims against Gita or Satyarth Prakash claiming relief... are in fact, meant to play mischief in the society."[39]
The Hindi version of the book, Sachchi Ramayana, was banned by the state government and all copies were seized in December 1969. The publisher challenged the decision in the Allahabad High Court. The court nullified the ban and asked the government to return all copies to the publisher. The state government challenged the High Court in the Supreme Court. On 16 September 1976, Supreme Court declared the ban to be illegal. However, the government ignored the court decisions and managed to stop sales of the book, until 1995. In 1995, after the political party Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) came to power, the book was widely published for the Periyar mela held in September 1995.[40]
Banned by Parkash Singh Badal-led Punjab government in 2001 for allegedly insulting the Sikh faith. The state arrested the people who were found in possession of the book, and confiscated its copies.[41] In November 2008, the Supreme Court of India overturned the ban, stating that the Punjab government was allowed to issue a fresh ban, if needed.[42] The Punjab Government then banned the book on 15 December 2008.[43]
The CPI(M) government banned the book on 28 November 2003 fearing that book could incite communal discord.[44] In November 2003, the Calcutta High Court put out an injunction against publication after a poet, Syed Hasmat Jalal, filed a 110 million INR defamation suit.[45] On 22 September 2005, the court lifted the ban.[46]
In January 2004, a mob alleging disparaging remarks made about Shivaji attacked Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute where Laine had researched the book. Several rare manuscripts were destroyed in the process.[47] On 14 January, the state government run by the Congress Party under Sushil Kumar Shinde banned the book.[48] In 2007, the Bombay High Court revoked the ban.[49] The state government challenged the decision in the Supreme Court. Supreme Court upheld the previous decision and lifted the ban in 2010.[50]
2006
The Epic of Shivaji: A Translation and Study of Kavindra Paramananda's Sivabharata
The book was released in 2003. It was banned by the Congress government in 2007 ground that it contained derogatory remarks about Islam and Prophet Mohammad.[53] In 2010, Bombay High Court upheld the ban.[54] The decision was challenged in the Supreme Court but it rejected the appeal.[53]
Banned in Gujarat but overturned.[19] The book was on banned on 19 August 2009,[55] for containing defamatory references to Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.[56] Jaswant Singh was also expelled from his political party, BJP, for writing this book.[57] On 4 September, the Gujarat High Court revoked the ban.[55][58]
The biographical book was claimed to have that Mahatma Gandhi was a bisexual, but its author Joseph Lelyveld denied this claim.[59][60] It is banned in the state of Gujarat (where Gandhi was born) on 31 March 2011.[61] The Union Law Minister Veerappa Moily hinted that the Centre may also ban the book. Gandhi's grandsons, Tushar Gandhi,[62]Rajmohan Gandhi[63] and Gopalkrishna Gandhi,[64] expressed opposition to the ban proposal. On 4 April, Moily ruled out the ban.[65]
2013
Meendezhum Pandiyar Varalaru (Resurgence of Pandiyan History)
The Tamil Nadu government banned this Tamil book on 30 May 2013 on grounds that it may cause violence and promote discord among communities. The book allegedly claims the Dalit community called Pallar, were among the rulers of the Pandya kingdom. The author has appealed in the Madras High Court against the ban.[66][67]
On 11 August 2017, the government of Jharkhand banned The Adivasi Will Not Dance: Stories and summarily suspended the author from his job, on the grounds that the book portrayed Adivasi women and Santhal culture in a bad light.[68] The key complainants appear to have been the ruling party in Jharkhand, the Bharatiya Janata Party, the opposition party Jharkhand Mukti Morcha, and an academic at Jamia Millia Islamia.[69] The government's actions were widely criticised.[70][71][72][73] The ban on The Adivasi Will Not Dance: Stories was removed in December 2017[74][75] and Shekhar's suspension was removed and he was reinstated into his job in 2018.[76][77]
Other challenged books
This section lists books that have been legally challenged to impose a ban or to exclude from a syllabus. Some books listed here are unavailable or were unavailable for some time in India or parts of it, due to pending court decisions or voluntary withdrawal by the publishers.
Pandit Lekh Ram's Risala-i-Jihad was challenged and a ban was attempted.[78] Risala-i-Jihad ya'ri Din-i-Muhammad ki Bunyad (A Treatise on waging holy war, or the foundation of the Muhammadan Religion) caused a considerable outcry, when it was published in 1892. Until his murder by a Mirza qadyani follower five years later, Lekh Ram continued to stir up animosity by his vituperative writings."[79]
On 20 July 1984, H.K. Chakraborty wrote to the Secretary, Department of Home Government of West Bengal, demanding the ban of the Quran. Chakraborty thereafter with Chandmal Chopra wrote to the Department of Home Government of West Bengal on 16 March 1985.[80] Chopra then filed a writ Petition at the High Court. Chandmal Chopra tried to obtain an order banning the Quran, by filing a Writ Petition at the Calcutta High Court on 29 March 1985. The petition claimed that Sections 153A and 295A of the Indian Penal Code, and Section 95 of the Criminal Procedure Code were often used by Muslims to ban or proscribe publications critical of Islam, and stated that "so far it had been the privilege of the Peoples of the Book to ban and burn the sacred literature of the Pagans."[80] Chandmal Chopra thought that the Koran "on grounds of religion promotes disharmony, feeling of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities and incite people to commit violence and disturb public tranquility..." The Telegraph of 9 May 1985 reported that the Union Government would make itself a party in the case, and the Union law minister Ashoke Sen and the attorney-general of the Government of India were going to take action against the case.[81] Muslim lawyers after a meeting condemned the case. According to The Telegraph of 10 May, the Chief Minister of West Bengal called the petition "a despicable act". Other politicians in the Lok Sabha at New Delhi, and the Minister of State for Law condemned the Petition.[82] Pakistan's minister of state for religious and minority affairs claimed that the petition was the "worst example of religious intolerance", and he urged the Indian government to "follow the example of Pakistan" in ensuring freedom of religion.[83] The petition was however dismissed in May 1985. The Attorney-General of the Government of India and the Advocate-General of West Bengal appeared in the case and argued against Chopra's petition. On 18 June 1985 Chandmal Chopra filed a review petition, which was dismissed on 21 June.[80][84][85]
Ram Swarup's Hindu View of Christianity and Islam was challenged by Syed Shahabuddin (who previously successfully managed to get the Satanic Verses banned). Indian authorities were to impose a ban on the book, Syed Shahabuddin asked that the government have the book examined "from the point of view of banning it under the law of the land."[86][87][88]
The book contained a character resembling Balasaheb Thackeray, the leader of the right-wing party Shiv Sena. The book faced protests from the party. The book also contained a dog named, Jawaharlal, named after India's first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru. Prime Minister P. V. Narasimha Raounofficially banned the book. In September 1995, the local publishers Rupa & Co. were asked to stop selling the book while it was being reviewed. Rupa & Co. decided to approach the Supreme Court of India in response.[89] The court the declared the ban unconstitutional in February 1996.[90] However, book sellers were reluctant to stock the book in Maharashtra, the home of Shiv Sena, due to the fear of vandalism.[91]
A preview of the book was posted on a website initially which triggered the controversy.[95][96] A spokesperson for the Vishwa Hindu Parishad[95] stated that the book was an attempt to insult Hindus. The book allegedly said that beef was eaten by ancient Indians. The author received anonymous threat calls and had to be provided a police escort.[96][97] A civil court in Andhra Pradesh put a temporary stay order on the book until verdict.[97]Pushpesh Pant[95] supported the book by stating that the evidence exists in historical and mythological texts. The book is also known as The Myth of the Holy Cow.[96]
The book is a dramatized account of the Bhopal disaster. In 2002, Swaraj Puri filed a defamation suit against the authors worth US$10 million. Puri, who was the police commissioner of Bhopal during the disaster is mentioned in the book.[98][99] In 2009, the court put an order to halt publication of the book.[98][99] But, the Madhya Pradesh High Court revoked the order later.[100]
On 5 November 2004, the Odisha High Court put a stay order on the release of the book, after a petition was filed.[101] The petitioner alleged that the book is blasphemous in nature and defamatory regarding Sri Aurobindo's character.[101][102]
The book was originally published in October 2010[103] in Spanish. The book is a fictional[103] novel allegedly based on Sonia Gandhi. Moro claimed that Congress lawyers and spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi had written to his publishers demanding them to withdraw the book from shops.[103][104] Abhishek Singhvi claimed that the book violated a person's privacy for monetary gain.[105] The book was finally released in India in January 2015.[106]
On 4 October 2010, this 1990 Booker nominated book was removed from the Bachelor of Arts (English) syllabus of the Mumbai University, after Bharatiya Vidyarthi Sena, the student-wing of the Shiv Sena protested. The book allegedly contained anti-Shiv Sena passages and remarks derogatory to Maharastrians.[107][108] The protests were led by Aditya Thackeray.[107] Mistry later expressed his dismay in an open letter to the university.[107]
Sahara India Pariwar moved Calcutta High Court in December 2013 seeking a stay and filed a Rs. 2 billion defamation suit against the author. In January 2014, a stay order was issued by the court. In April, both the parties reached an out of court settlement following which the book was published with a disclaimer given by Sahara.[111][112]
The publisher, Bloomsbury India, agreed to withdraw all copies of the book, after former Aviation Minister Praful Patel filed a defamation suit in a Mumbai court. The publisher also issued a public apology.[113][114]
The writer asked publishers to withdraw all his books from the market and announced that he was giving up writing on 13 January 2015.[115] The BJP, RSS and other Hindu groups had protested his book, and demanded its ban and his arrest. They had alleged that he had portrayed the Kailasanathar temple in Tiruchengode and its women devotees in bad light. The English translation of the book is known as One Part Woman.[116]
A complaint was filed against the author in June 2015 in a Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu court alleging the novel had portrayed fishermen, Christianity, priests and nuns in bad light.[117]
A petition was filed in the Delhi High Court seeking a ban on the sale of the book. The book allegedly compares Hindutva to radical groups like the Islamic State and the Boko Haram. The Court rejected petition.[118]
^Meeta; Rajivlochan (2007). "Caste and Religion in Punjab: Case of the Bhaniarawala Phenomenon". Economic and Political Weekly. 42 (21): 1909–1913. JSTOR4419630.
^Arya Dharm: Hindu Consciousness in 19th-century Punjab by Kenneth W. Jones
^(Punjab and the Raj, 1849–1947", p. 72–73) Ian Talbot.
^ abcChandmal, Chopra; Ram, Goel, Sita; India), India. High Court (Calcutta (1 January 2012). The Calcutta Quran petition. Voice of India. ISBN978-8185990583. OCLC935213876.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^The Telegraph 9 May 1985. The Telegraph 10 May 1985.
^Arun Shourie: How should we respond? The Observer of Business and Politics, New Delhi, on 26 November 1993
^K.S. Lal Statement by Indian intellectuals on Syed Shahabuddin's attempt to make the authorities impose a ban on the book Hindu View of Christianity and Islam by Ram Swarup (1993)
^Goel, S. R., Arun Shourie (1998). Freedom of expression: Secular theocracy versus liberal democracy.