In electromagnetism and materials science, the Jiles–Atherton model of magnetic hysteresis was introduced in 1984 by David Jiles and D. L. Atherton.[1] This is one of the most popular models of magnetic hysteresis. Its main advantage is the fact that this model enables connection with physical parameters of the magnetic material.[2] Jiles–Atherton model enables calculation of minor and major hysteresis loops.[1]
The original Jiles–Atherton model is suitable only for isotropic materials.[1] However, an extension of this model presented by Ramesh et al.[3] and corrected by Szewczyk [4] enables the modeling of anisotropic magnetic materials.
Principles
Magnetization of the magnetic material sample in Jiles–Atherton model is calculated in the following steps [1] for each value of the magnetizing field :
effective magnetic field is calculated considering interdomain coupling and magnetization ,
anhysteretic magnetization is calculated for effective magnetic field ,
magnetization of the sample is calculated by solving ordinary differential equation taking into account sign of derivative of magnetizing field (which is the source of hysteresis).
Parameters
Original Jiles–Atherton model considers following parameters:[1]
Parameter
Units
Description
Quantifies interdomain coupling in the magnetic material
A/m
Quantifies domain walls density in the magnetic material
A/m
Saturation magnetization of material
A/m
Quantifies average energy required to break pinning site in the magnetic material
Magnetization reversibility
Extension considering uniaxial anisotropy introduced by Ramesh et al.[3] and corrected by Szewczyk [4] requires additional parameters:
Parameter
Units
Description
J/m3
Average anisotropy energy density
rad
Angle between direction of magnetizing field and direction of anisotropy easy axis
Participation of anisotropic phase in the magnetic material
Modelling the magnetic hysteresis loops
Effective magnetic field
Effective magnetic field influencing on magnetic moments within the material may be calculated from the following equation:[1]
Anhysteretic magnetization can be observed experimentally, when magnetic material is demagnetized under the influence of constant magnetic field. However, measurements of anhysteretic magnetization are very sophisticated due to the fact, that the fluxmeter has to keep accuracy of integration during the demagnetization process. As a result, experimental verification of the model of anhysteretic magnetization is possible only for materials with negligible hysteresis loop.[4]
Anhysteretic magnetization of typical magnetic material can be calculated as a weighted sum of isotropic and anisotropic anhysteretic magnetization:[5]
Isotropic
Isotropic anhysteretic magnetization is determined on the base of Boltzmann distribution. In the case of isotropic magnetic materials, Boltzmann distribution can be reduced to Langevin function connecting isotropic anhysteretic magnetization with effective magnetic field :[1]
Anisotropic
Anisotropic anhysteretic magnetization is also determined on the base of Boltzmann distribution.[3] However, in such a case, there is no antiderivative for the Boltzmann distribution function.[4] For this reason, integration has to be made numerically. In the original publication, anisotropic anhysteretic magnetization is given as:[3]
where
It should be highlighted, that a typing mistake occurred in the original Ramesh et al. publication.[4] As a result, for an isotropic material (where ), the presented form of anisotropic anhysteretic magnetization is not consistent with the isotropic anhysteretic magnetization given by the Langevin equation. Physical analysis leads to the conclusion that the equation for anisotropic anhysteretic magnetization has to be corrected to the following form:[4]
In the corrected form, the model for anisotropic anhysteretic magnetization was confirmed experimentally for anisotropic amorphous alloys.[4]
Vectorized Jiles–Atherton model is constructed as the superposition of three scalar models one for each principal axis.[7] This model is especially suitable for finite element method computations.
^ abcdRamesh, A.; Jiles, D. C.; Roderick, J. M. (1996). "A model of anisotropic anhysteretic magnetization". IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 32 (5): 4234. Bibcode:1996ITM....32.4234R. doi:10.1109/20.539344.
^Szewczyk, R.; Bienkowski, A. (2003). "Magnetoelastic Villari effect in high-permeability Mn-Zn ferrites and modeling of this effect". Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 254: 284–286. Bibcode:2003JMMM..254..284S. doi:10.1016/S0304-8853(02)00784-9.
^Huang, Sy-Ruen; Chen, Hong-Tai; Wu, Chueh-Cheng; et al. (2012). "Distinguishing internal winding faults from inrush currents in power transformers using Jiles–Atherton model parameters based on correlation voefficient". IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 27 (2): 548. doi:10.1109/TPWRD.2011.2181543. S2CID25854265.
^Szewczyk, R.; Bienkowski, A. (2004). "Application of the energy-based model for the magnetoelastic properties of amorphous alloys for sensor applications". Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 272: 728–730. Bibcode:2004JMMM..272..728S. doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.11.270.
^Szewczyk, R.; Salach, J.; Bienkowski, A.; et al. (2012). "Application of extended Jiles–Atherton model for modeling the magnetic characteristics of Fe41.5Co41.5Nb3Cu1B13 alloy in as-quenched and nanocrystalline State". IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 48 (4): 1389. Bibcode:2012ITM....48.1389S. doi:10.1109/TMAG.2011.2173562.
^Moldovanu, B.O.; Moldovanu, C.; Moldovanu, A. (1996). "Computer simulation of the transient behaviour of a fluxgate magnetometric circuit". Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 157–158: 565–566. Bibcode:1996JMMM..157..565M. doi:10.1016/0304-8853(95)01101-3.