French ship Inflexible (1755)

The Battle of Quiberon Bay, in which the Inflexible took part, and which indirectly led to his downfall.
History
NameInflexible
LaunchedMay 14, 1755
CompletedNovember 21, 1752[N 1]
General characteristics
Displacement1,150 t
Length45.11 m
Beam12.37 m
Installed power64 canons
PropulsionSailing
Capacity620 to 650 people[N 2]

Inflexible was a 64-gun ship constructed by Pierre Morineau between 1752 and 1754 and launched from Rochefort in 1755. It was constructed during the period of shipbuilding [fr] between the conclusion of the War of Austrian Succession (1748) and the commencement of the Seven Years' War (1755).[3] The ship participated in many missions during this conflict and was lost at sea in 1760 following its involvement in the Battle of Quiberon Bay.

Main characteristics

Inflexible was a medium-armed vessel constructed by the standards established by French shipbuilders in the 1730s and 1740s [fr]. These standards were designed to achieve an optimal balance between cost, maneuverability, and firepower, to maintain a competitive edge against the English navy, which possessed a significantly larger number of ships.[4] It was categorized as a "64-gun" ship, the inaugural vessel of which was launched in 1735, followed by numerous others until the late 1770s. However, these ships were ultimately superseded by those designated as "74-gun[N 3][5]" vessels.

Under the prevailing naval construction techniques of the period, the vessel's hull was crafted from oak, its rigging from pine, and its sails and ropes from hemp.[6] In comparison to 74-gun ships, this vessel was less powerful due to the combination of a reduced number of guns and a smaller caliber of artillery. The first gun deck was equipped with twenty-six 24-pound cannons, arranged in thirteen gun ports, while the second gun deck had twenty-eight 12-pound cannons, distributed across fourteen ports. Additionally, the upper decks were fitted with ten 6-pound cannons.[7] This artillery configuration was typical for a 64-gun ship. The cannons were made of iron, with a reserve of approximately 50 to 60 cannonballs, exclusive of chain shots and grapeshot.[6]

To feed the hundreds of men that comprised its crew, Inflexible was also a large transporter that had to carry sufficient supplies for two to three months of freshwater and five to six months of food, according to the standards of the time.[8] The vessel was capable of transporting a considerable quantity of provisions, including dozens of tons of water, wine, oil, vinegar, flour, hardtack, cheese, salted meat and fish, dried fruits and vegetables, condiments, cheese, and even live livestock, which were to be slaughtered during the campaign.[8]

History

Plan of the Battle of Quiberon Bay, with the dislocation of the French squadron and the escape of some of the ships to the Vilaine River. Inflexible is one of them.

Inflexible commenced its operational career at the outset of the Seven Years' War. The vessel's inaugural captain was Monsieur de Guébriant.[9] It was incorporated into a modest squadron of six ships and three frigates under the direction of Lieutenant General Macnemara, whose responsibility was to provide security for 18 vessels transporting reinforcements to Canada, under the command of Dubois de La Motte.[10] Macnemara was instructed to avoid unnecessary risks when confronting the English forces. Consequently, he cruised along the coastline before returning (May 3–May 20, 1755), leaving Dubois de La Motte to complete the mission independently.[10] With Macnemara falling ill and resigning, Inflexible remained under the same command but was reassigned to Du Gay, who patrolled the waters near Brest to safeguard incoming trade convoys.[11]

In 1757, Inflexible was placed under the command of Captain de Tilly and was incorporated into a division of five ships and a frigate under the command of Squadron Commander Bauffremont. The objective of this division was to sail to the West Indies and North America to defend the sugar islands and Louisbourg.[12] On January 31, the vessel set sail from Brest for Saint-Domingue, where it arrived a few weeks later with the other ships, having disembarked troops.[12] Subsequently, the vessel proceeded to Canada, arriving in May. This enabled it to participate in the substantial naval concentration that prevented the invasion of Louisbourg that year. In October, Inflexible departed from the area and returned to France. Like other vessels, it was affected by the severe typhus epidemic that devastated the crews and spread to Brest upon its arrival in November, resulting in the deaths of thousands in the city.[13] During this campaign, the death of Captain de Tilly resulted in the ship being placed under the command of Monsieur de Saint-Laurent.[12]

As was the case with the majority of the Brest fleet, Inflexible remained docked in 1758 to reorganize its crew, which had been disordered by the epidemic of the previous year, and of preparing for the 1759 campaign, which the government hoped would prove decisive, given that a landing in England was planned.[14] Inflexible was mobilized under the command of Chevalier de Caumont to serve in the rear guard of the 21-ship squadron under Conflans, which was tasked with escorting the invasion fleet.[14] On November 20, 1759, the ship participated in the unsuccessful Battle of Quiberon Bay, where it played a relatively minor role. Following this defeat, it sought refuge in the Vilaine River with six other vessels,[15][7] where it was blockaded by the English fleet.

To evade an assault by the Navy's fireships, Inflexible was stripped of its artillery and heavy equipment, thereby enabling it to navigate as far upstream in the Vilaine estuary as possible. However, on January 1, 1760, a storm arose, resulting in the shipwreck of Inflexible. The vessel was wrecked "breaking on a rock," necessitating the dismantling of the ship to salvage whatever could be saved.[16] Inflexible is one of 37 ships lost by France during the Seven Years' War.[N 4] Its wreck now lies beneath the waters of the Arzal dam [fr].

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Ronald Deschênes cites 1752-54 as the construction years.[1]
  2. ^ The typical ratio on all types of warships in the 18th century was approximately 10 men per cannon, regardless of each one’s role aboard. Thus, a 100-gun ship carried 1,000 men, an 80-gun ship 800 men, a 74-gun ship 740, a 64-gun ship 640, etc. The officers were in addition. However, this standard crew size could vary considerably in the event of an epidemic, combat losses, or a shortage of sailors at the time of boarding.[2]
  3. ^ The 74-gun ships were a technical extension of the 64-gun design, appearing nine years after the launch of the first 64-gun ship, Borée. For a chronology of launches and ship series, see also the list of ships of the line of France.
  4. ^ 18 ships were captured by the enemy; 19 ships were burned or lost due to shipwrecks.[17]

References

  1. ^ Deschênes, Ronald. "Vaisseaux de ligne français de 1682 à 1780 du deuxième rang". Association de généalogie d'Haïti (in French). Archived from the original on July 9, 2012. Retrieved April 29, 2016.
  2. ^ Acerra & Zysberg 1997, p. 220. See also Jean Meyer in Vergé-Franceschi 2002, p. 105
  3. ^ Villiers 2015, p. 126
  4. ^ Meyer & Acerra 1994, pp. 90–91
  5. ^ Acerra & Zysberg 1997, p. 67 & Meyer & Acerra 1994, pp. 90–91
  6. ^ a b Acerra & Zysberg 1997, pp. 107–119
  7. ^ a b Deschênes, Ronald. "Vaisseaux de ligne français de 1682 à 1780 du troisième rang". Association de généalogie d’Haïti (in French). Archived from the original on September 21, 2012. Retrieved April 29, 2016.
  8. ^ a b Jacques Gay in Vergé-Franceschi 2002, pp. 1486–1487 & Jean Meyer in Vergé-Franceschi 2002, pp. 1031–1034
  9. ^ Troude 1868, p. 326
  10. ^ a b Lacour-Gayet 1910, pp. 254–255
  11. ^ Taillemite 2002, p. 152
  12. ^ a b c Troude 1868, p. 341
  13. ^ Meyer & Acerra 1994, pp. 106–108
  14. ^ a b Lacour-Gayet 1910, pp. 341-380 & 519-520.
  15. ^ Roche 2005
  16. ^ Perrochon, Cécile (2011). Les Cahiers du Pays de Guérande (in French). Vol. 53. Société des Amis de Guérande. p. 36. ISSN 0765-3565.
  17. ^ Vergé-Franceschi 2002, p. 1327

Bibliography