Frank Smith (b. London, England, 1928–d. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 2020) was a British psycholinguist[1][2] recognized for his contributions in linguistics and cognitive psychology.[3] He was an essential contributor to research on the nature of the reading process together with researchers such as George Armitage Miller, Kenneth S. Goodman, Paul A. Kolers, Jane W. Torrey, Jane Mackworth, Richard Venezky, Robert Calfee, and Julian Hochberg.[4] Smith and Goodman are founders of whole language approach for reading instruction.[5] He was the author of numerous books.
Smith's research made important contributions to the development of reading theory.[10] His book Understanding Reading: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read is regarded as a fundamental text in the development of the now discredited[11][12][13][14][15][16][17]whole language movement.[18] Amongst others, Smith's research and writings in psycholinguistics inspired cognitive psychologists Keith Stanovich and Richard West's research into the role of context in reading.[19]
Smith's work, in particular Understanding Reading: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read, is a synthesis of psycholinguistic and cognitive psychology research applied to reading.[20] Working from diverse perspectives, Frank Smith and Kenneth S. Goodman developed the theory of a unified single reading process that comprises an interaction between reader, text and language.[21] On the whole, Smith's writing challenges conventional teaching and diverts from popular assumptions about reading.[22]
Apart from his research in language, his research interests included the psychological, social and cultural consequences of human technology.[23]
Ideas
Smith advocated the concept that "children learn to read by reading".[24] In 1975 he participated in a television documentary filmed by Stephen Rose for the BBCHorizon TV series while based at the Toronto Institute for Studies in Education. The programme focused on his work with a single 3+1⁄2-year-old child called Matthew.[24]
He was against the 1970s idea that children should first learn the letters and letter combinations that convey the English language's forty-four sounds (Clymer's 45 phonic generalizations[25]) and then they can read whole words by decoding them from their component phonemes. This "sounding out" words is a phonics, rather than a whole language, technique which is rooted in intellectual independence. The whole-language theory explained reading as a "language experience," where the reader interacts with the text/content and this in turn facilitates the link – "knowledge" – between the text and meaning. The emphasis is on the process or comprehension of the text.[26]
Smith, Frank (2004). Understanding Reading: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read. Routledge. ISBN978-0-8058-4712-3.
Articles
Smith, Frank (1989). "Overselling Literacy". The Phi Delta Kappan. 70 (5). Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa International: 352–359.
Smith, Frank (1992). "Learning to Read: The Never-Ending Debate". The Phi Delta Kappan. 73 (6). Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa International: 432–441.
Smith, Frank (1995). "Let's Declare Education a Disaster and Get in with Our Lives". The Phi Delta Kappan. 76 (8). Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa International: 584–590.
Smith, Frank (2001). "Just a Matter of Time". The Phi Delta Kappan. 82 (8). Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa International: 572–576.
Co-authored articles
Smith, Frank; Lott, Deborah; Cronnell, Bruce (1969). "The Effect of Type Size and Case Alternation on Word Identification". The American Journal of Psychology. 82 (2). Illinois: University of Illinois Press: 248–253. doi:10.2307/1421250. JSTOR1421250. PMID5811185.
References
^Cooper, CR and Petrosky, AR. "A Psycholinguistic View of the Fluent Reading Process". Journal of Reading, 20(3):185
^Adams, M.J. (1996). Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
^Gough, P.B.; Hillinger, M.L. (1980). "Learning to read: An unnatural act". Bulletin of the Orton Society. 30: 179–196. doi:10.1007/BF02653717. S2CID143275563.
^Hempenstall, Kerry. "Whole Language! What was that all about?". National Institute for Direct Instruction. National Institute for Direct Instruction. Retrieved 29 January 2019.
^Groff, P. "Guided Reading, Whole Language Style". [1]Archived 27 November 2010 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 28 November 2010
^Stanovich, KE. "Progress in Understanding Reading: Scientific Foundations and New Frontiers". 2000. p. 5;45
^Nystrand, M and Duffy, John. "Towards a Rhetoric of Everyday Life: New Directions on Research in Writing, Text, and Discourse". 2003. p.123-124
^Goodman, Yetta M. "Roots of the Whole-Language Movement". The Elementary School Journal, (90):2117
^Reinking, David. "Untitled Review". Journal of Reading, 35(2):174
^Smith, F. "Ourselves: Why We Are Who We Are". 2006, p. xiv
^ abSmith, Frank (1976). "Learning to Read by Reading". Language Arts. 53 (3): 297–322. JSTOR41404150.