Type of drug intended to protect the brain after stroke onset
A cerebroprotectant (formerly known as a neuroprotectant) is a drug that is intended to protect the brain after the onset of acute ischemic stroke.[1] As stroke is the second largest cause of death worldwide and a leading cause of adult disability, over 150 drugs have been tested in clinical trials to provide cerebroprotection.[2][3][4]
Approved drugs
Tissue plasminogen activator (also known as tPA, t-PA, rtPA, Activase, or Alteplase or Actilyse)[5] is a drug that breaks down blood clots. It was first approved in 1996, yet this drug has no generic competition. US sales of the drug under the brand name Activase and a similar drug were approximately US$1.3 billion in 2021, while European sales under the brand name Actilyse were an additional 448 million Euro in 2019.[6][7]
Edaravone (radicut) was approved in Japan in 2001.[8] It has an unknown mechanism of action, but is hypothesized to act through its antioxidant properties.
Drugs in development
Approval rate
While over 150 cerebroprotectants have been tested in clinical trials, as of 2022 only the above two cerebroprotectants are approved, though several clinical trials for other drugs are ongoing. The approval rate has been less than 2%, which is low compared to the overall approval rate of all drugs brought into clinical trials in all disease areas from 2011 to 2022 which was 7.9%.[9] It is also much lower than the relatively high success rate for devices to treat acute ischemic stroke, as there have been at least 5 different clot removal devices approved since 2015.[10]
Methods to increase approval rate
There are many theories as to the causes of the low approval rate for cerebroprotectants, and many strategies have been suggested in publications to improve the chance of approval of drugs in development. The strategies that journals suggest to improve the chance of approval in clinical trials are outlined below:
Choose the right targets
Continuous research into the pathophysiology of stroke has led to improved ability to select drugs targets.[1] Acute ischemic strokes start when there is reduced blood flow, often caused by an occlusion, to part of the brain.[11] Even if an occlusion causes a complete blockage of a major artery, there is typically still some blood flow downstream of the blockage through collateral blood vessels.[12] With reduced blood flow, there is reduced oxygen supply, and to compensate the tissue goes through anaerobic metabolism which is much less efficient.[13] If anaerobic metabolism does not provide enough energy, there is energy failure, followed by ion imbalances.[14] Afterwards, the pathophysiology gets complicated and there are thought to be at least eight pathways of tissue damage.[15] By targeting processes near the top of the top of the chain of events, problems further down the chain of events can be avoided. For example, the drug tPA and mechanical thrombectomy devices all target the occlusion which is at the top of the chain of events, and have achieved FDA approval. The next step in the chain of events is hypoxia, and some oxygen delivery drugs have shown strong effects in animal studies, as shown in the table below. If processes further down the chain of events get targeted, there may be many simultaneous problems and the effect of a single therapy may be less, so there may be benefit to using multiple drugs in combination to treat multiple pathways.[1]
Choose the best candidates from pre-clinical (animal) studies
A 2006 analysis of studies for 1,026 therapies in stroke and theorized that the best drugs from pre-clinical studies were not the ones being brought into clinical trials. Many of the drugs with the strongest signals in pre-clinical models were not the ones later brought into clinical trials.[4]
Improve pre-clinical testing
Others proposed that the lack of standardization in pre-clinical models made it difficult to select the best drugs.[1] One attempt to address this comes from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke which started the Stroke Preclinical Assessment Network to fund a testing regimen that will allow head-to-head comparisons of different drugs.[16]
Treat patients early enough
After the onset of stroke, the amount of brain tissue that dies increases over time, leading to the saying, "Time is brain."[17] Treating patients earlier can lead to a greater amount of brain tissue being saved.
Protect the brain for long enough
An element of clinical trial design that affects the probability that a truly beneficial drug will show benefit is the duration of protection. A truly effective drug that is tested in a clinical trial where it protects the brain for a longer period of time would be expected to show a greater benefit verses a placebo than the same drug in a different clinical trial where it only protects the brain for a shorter period of time.[18]
Select patients with salvageable tissue
Another element of clinical trial design is the use of imaging biomarkers to select patients that are likely to benefit from therapy. MRI and CT imaging methods that determine whether a patient is likely to have salvageable tissue have been used to great effect in clinical trials that showed the benefit of mechanical thrombectomy devices.[19] These same methods can be applied to clinical trials for cerebroprotective drugs.[18]
Restore blood flow after protection so that protected tissue can survive long term
If a drug protects the brain from reduced blood flow but then wears off before blood flow is normalized, then the long term effect of the drug may not be as great as it would be if the drug were paired with therapy to normalize blood flow. Pairing cerebroprotective drugs with approved methods to restore blood flow, such as tPA or mechanical thrombectomy, may increase their long term benefit.[11][18]
Clinical trials
Rank
Name
First Trial
Mechanism
% Protection in Animal Studies (% Reduction in Infarct Volume)
Number of Animal Studies from Which % Protection has been Calculated
Comments
Focal ischemic stroke studies with positive results
Focal ischemic stroke studies showing no change
Focal ischemic stroke studies with negative results
Sources
1
Oxygenated fluorocarbon nutrient emulsion (OFNE) or Revoxyn
2001
Oxygen delivery
94
1
A perfluorocarbon emulsion that required drilling a hole in the skull (called a ventricular catheter). A clinical trial in 4 patients demonstrated safety, but enrollment was slow and company folded.
Inconsistent studies in rats, one showing dramatic effect, another showing no effect. A randomized Phase II clinical trial in 30 patients showed statistically significant improvements in NIHSS and Barthel index. Development discontinued for unknown reasons.
Another perfluorocarbon emulsion injected intravenously thought to improve oxygen flow from red blood cells to tissue. A Phase Ib/II clinical trial was completed. The drug was safe at all three doses tested, and the high dose group had significantly better function independence (modified Rankin Scale).
Trial in 40 patients showed that it is not cerebroprotective, but does not worsen condition or neurological outcome; reduction in seizures, and increase of MI and renal failure versus placebo.
Enrolled patients within 6 hours after stroke, but did not include patients who received tPA. The study was terminated, and the results were not reported.
"The cause of the neutral results with gavestinel remains to be explained. It is possible that the time window to effectively antagonize glutamate is simply less than 6 h, or that the neuroprotective benefit of infarct size reduction in animals does not translate into improved functional outcome measured in clinical trials. Just as likely, however, expectations with gavestinel were over-inflated because only positive preclinical results were published (it is common that negative results in animal studies go unreported). Mild beneficial effects were only seen in carefully standardized stroke models that do not reflect the heterogeneity of stroke patients where more robust efficacy would be needed to achieve clinical significance."
A Phase II clinical trial in 110 patients published in 2019 showed the drug was safe, and there was a trend towards less hemorrhage, but there was also a trend towards less favorable outcomes. The incidence of favorable outcome (90-day mRS 0 or 1) was not statistically significantly different from placebo, (45.2% treatment vs 62.8% placebo).
tPA was approved for use up to 3 hours after onset, though the initial tirals up to 6 hours after onset showed no significant improvement. Pre-clinical models showed a beneficial effect of the drug when given up to 3 hours but a detrimental effect when given beyond 3 hours.
Glibenclamide (BIIB093, BIIB-093, glibenclamide IV, formerly Cirara or RP-1127).
2010
selective inhibitor of SUR1-TRPM4 channels that mediate stroke related brain swelling.
45
3
As of 2022 Biogen is in Phase III in patients with large infarcts with volumes of 80 to 300 centimeters cubed. These patients tend to have poor outcomes due to the large infarcts.
AstraZeneca's drug that completed its second Phase III in 2006, leading to what some called the "nuclear winter" in stroke research. At the time, imaging biomarkers were less developed. Secondly, mechanical thrombectomy was not invented yet, and patients with large vessel occlusions in the trial likely had low reperfusion rates. Furthermore, the pathology is better known today, and the chain of events is better understood. The drug targteted processes that were far downstream in the ischemic cascade thereby giving the drug a weaker clinical signal than many drugs targeting processes further up the ischemic cascade. The first Phase III in 1700 patients saw a significant improvement in mRS (p=0.03), but missed all its secondary endpoints. A second Phase III in 3,300 patients saw no effect in any endpoint.
Calcium inhibitor, Vasodilator, Sodium blocker; synthetic derivative of the vinca alkaloid vincamine, an extract from the lesser periwinkle plant.
42
1
Results of Phase III published in 2016. Off patent - first made in 1975. A clinical trial in 610 patients in China was completed, showing improved outcomes in NIHSS, and Barthel Index.
NR2B-selective NMDA receptor antagonist and spin trapping molecule (=free radical scavenger or antioxidant)
41.2
1
GNT Pharma. Enrolls only patients with confirmed AIS eligible for MT up to 8 hours after onset. The drug will provide only a short duration of protection before MT restores blood flow, probably averaging an hour or less. If they paused the clock perfectly, they would need thousands of patients to show an effect, so there is risk of failing the Phase II due to having too short of a duration of protection. Therapeutic potential of Neu2000 has been well demonstrated in four animal models of stroke with better efficacy and therapeutic time windows than either NMDA receptor antagonist or anti-oxidant advanced to clinical trials. In human phase I studies of 165 healthy subjects conducted in the United States and China, Neu2000KWL showed promising safety profiles without any serious adverse events.
NoNO Inc is using an ion channel inhibitor called NA-1 (nerenetide). They recently completed a Phase III clinical trial in Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy, but the trial showed neutral results in the overall population. The subset of patients that did not get tPA showed benefit, therefore they are seeking to run another Phase III clinical in LVO patients who are ineligible for tPA and hope to initiate this trial in 2021. They are enrolling in another Phase III trial that enrolls a broad population of stroke patients in the field, and results are expected in 2022.
Initiated Phase 1 trial in June 2018. The osmotic imbalance and subsequent influx of water via AQP4 occurs as a result of a lack of oxygen and leads to edema, midline shift, increased intracranial pressure and brain herniation resulting in permanent disability or mortality. Targets the same physiology as Biogen's BIIB-093 (glyburide for incjection or CIRARA), but via a different pathway. Edema is further down the ischemic cascade than hypoxia.
Tested again in 2009. Clnical trial showed no significant difference in neurological recovery. Significantly increased mortality rate and safety concerns
The first drug tested that had a significant amount of patients dosed in the first 2 hours in the FAST-MAG trial. Phase III results published in 2015 showed no therapeutic benefit.
Several human studies evaluating normobaric oxygen therapy for stroke treatment have been performed. However, there is not much room to increase oxygen delivery by increasing the concentration of oxygen breathed does not increase the blood oxygen level much. The normal oxygen saturation of red blood cells is 95-99%, and plasma only dissolves a small amount of oxygen. Human studies showed no significant difference in neurological recovery. No trials have shown any evidence that the therapy is detrimental.
Not effective in reducing infarct size. However, a smaller infarct size was observed in patients with proximal cerebral arteryocclusion and efficient recanalization.
prevents leukocytes from moving across the blood-brain barrier
22
3
Discontinued by Biogen after a Phase II trial showed that natalizumab administered ≤24 hours after acute ischemic stroke did not improve patient outcomes.
Continued in 2011. Clinical trials showed improvement of level of consciousness was statistically significant in Dexamethasone treated group, but did not reduce volume of hypodense area.
The data in animals showed benefit below 3 hours after stroke onset and a detrimental effect after three hours (an increase in infarct volume). The data is calculated from the caterpillar plot in figure 1.
A total of 1070 patients were enrolled in this study. Five hundred twenty-nine patients were assigned to Cerebrolysin and 541 to placebo. The confirmatory end point showed no significant difference between the treatment groups. When the predefined stratification by severity was repeated with the criterion NIHSS, however, a small superiority for Cerebrolysin in the sub-group with baseline NIHSS>12 (OR, 1.27; CI-LB, 0.97; P=0.04) could be shown . Also, when applying the mRS, a small superiority in the sub-group with baseline NIHSS>12 (OR, 1.27; CI-LB, 0.90; P=0.09) was found. The following analysis also focused on the subgroup baseline NIHSS>12 points only and provided a global test result for all 3 criteria combined. This global test results in MW=0.53 (CI-LB, 0.47; P=0.16), which showed a beneficial trend for Cerebrolysin in the study patients.
Phase III results published in 2015. ENOS enrolled 4011 participants with acute stroke (within 48 h of onset). Overall, there was no significant shift in functional outcome measured using the modified Rankin Scale at day 90, or of any secondary outcomes. Off patent. $7 per patch.
^Nader-Kawachi J, Góngora-Rivera F, Santos-Zambrano J, Calzada P, Ríos C (April 2007). "Neuroprotective effect of dapsone in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a pilot study". Neurological Research. 29 (3): 331–334. doi:10.1179/016164107X159234. PMID17509235. S2CID23075441.
^Ríos C, Nader-Kawachi J, Rodriguez-Payán AJ, Nava-Ruiz C (March 2004). "Neuroprotective effect of dapsone in an occlusive model of focal ischemia in rats". Brain Research. 999 (2): 212–215. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2003.11.040. PMID14759500. S2CID6110585.
^Diaz-Ruiz A, Roldan-Valadez E, Ortiz-Plata A, Mondragón-Lozano R, Heras-Romero Y, Mendez-Armenta M, et al. (September 2016). "Dapsone improves functional deficit and diminishes brain damage evaluated by 3-Tesla magnetic resonance image after transient cerebral ischemia and reperfusion in rats". Brain Research. 1646: 384–392. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2016.06.023. PMID27321157. S2CID25685864.
^Clinical trial number NCT02235558 for "Super-Selective Intra-Arterial Administration of Verapamil for Neuroprotection After Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke Phase I Study" at ClinicalTrials.gov
^Britton P, Lu XC, Laskosky MS, Tortella FC (1997). "Dextromethorphan protects against cerebral injury following transient, but not permanent, focal ischemia in rats". Life Sciences. 60 (20): 1729–1740. doi:10.1016/s0024-3205(97)00132-x. PMID9150412.
^Noh SJ, Lee SH, Shin KY, Lee CK, Cho IH, Kim HS, et al. (March 2011). "SP-8203 reduces oxidative stress via SOD activity and behavioral deficit in cerebral ischemia". Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior. 98 (1): 150–154. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2010.12.014. PMID21172384. S2CID37640897.
^Clinical trial number NCT02787278 for "A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded Phase IIa Clinical Trial to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Two Doses of SP-8203 in Patients With Ischemic Stroke Requiring rtPA Standard of Care" at ClinicalTrials.gov
^Clinical trial number NCT02258204 for "Effets de la kétamine en Association Avec le Rt-PA au Cours de l'Infarctus cérébral Aigu: étude Pilote contrôlée randomisée en Double Aveugle Avec critère de Jugement Radiologique" at ClinicalTrials.gov
^Fujiki M, Kobayashi H, Uchida S, Inoue R, Ishii K (May 2005). "Neuroprotective effect of donepezil, a nicotinic acetylcholine-receptor activator, on cerebral infarction in rats". Brain Research. 1043 (1–2): 236–241. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.02.063. PMID15862539. S2CID27373206.
^Cheng T, Liu D, Griffin JH, Fernández JA, Castellino F, Rosen ED, et al. (March 2003). "Activated protein C blocks p53-mediated apoptosis in ischemic human brain endothelium and is neuroprotective". Nature Medicine. 9 (3): 338–342. doi:10.1038/nm826. PMID12563316. S2CID306232.
^Hong H, Zeng JS, Kreulen DL, Kaufman DI, Chen AF (November 2006). "Atorvastatin protects against cerebral infarction via inhibition of NADPH oxidase-derived superoxide in ischemic stroke". American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 291 (5): H2210 –H2215. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01270.2005. PMID16766636. S2CID11908429.
^Clinical trial number NCT02452502 for "The Safety and Efficacy Study of High Dose Atorvastatin After Thrombolytic Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke" at ClinicalTrials.gov
^Clinical trial number NCT00777140 for "Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Dose-finding Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Intravenous Deferoxamine in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated With Tissue Plasminogen Activator" at ClinicalTrials.gov
^Kim Y, Kim YS, Noh MY, Lee H, Joe B, Kim HY, et al. (June 2017). "Neuroprotective effects of a novel poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibitor, JPI-289, in hypoxic rat cortical neurons". Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology. 44 (6): 671–679. doi:10.1111/1440-1681.12757. PMID28370165. S2CID32162935.
^Clinical trial number NCT03062397 for "A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase IIa Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JPI-289 in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke" at ClinicalTrials.gov
^Ortega FJ, Gimeno-Bayon J, Espinosa-Parrilla JF, Carrasco JL, Batlle M, Pugliese M, et al. (May 2012). "ATP-dependent potassium channel blockade strengthens microglial neuroprotection after hypoxia-ischemia in rats". Experimental Neurology. 235 (1): 282–296. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.02.010. hdl:2445/34278. PMID22387180. S2CID4828181.
^Clinical trial number NCT02864953 for "Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous BIIB093 (Glibenclamide) for Severe Cerebral Edema Following Large Hemispheric Infarction" at ClinicalTrials.gov
^Matsuura S, Egi Y, Yuki S, Horikawa T, Satoh H, Akira T (September 2011). "MP-124, a novel poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) inhibitor, ameliorates ischemic brain damage in a non-human primate model". Brain Research. 1410: 122–131. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.05.069. PMID21741620. S2CID22390945.
^Egi Y, Matsuura S, Maruyama T, Fujio M, Yuki S, Akira T (May 2011). "Neuroprotective effects of a novel water-soluble poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibitor, MP-124, in in vitro and in vivo models of cerebral ischemia". Brain Research. 1389: 169–176. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.03.031. PMID21420942. S2CID20524045.
^Clinical trial number NCT01400035 for "The Investigation of Vinpocetine (Cavinton) for Treatment of Acute Cerebral Infarction, an Open, Multicenter, Randomized, Control Study" at ClinicalTrials.gov
^Zhang W, Huang Y, Li Y, Tan L, Nao J, Hu H, et al. (September 2016). "Efficacy and Safety of Vinpocetine as Part of Treatment for Acute Cerebral Infarction: A Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled, Multicenter CAVIN (Chinese Assessment for Vinpocetine in Neurology) Trial". Clinical Drug Investigation. 36 (9): 697–704. doi:10.1007/s40261-016-0415-x. PMID27283947. S2CID207484127.
^Clinical trial number NCT02831088 for "A Phase II, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Neu2000KWL in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Receiving Endovascular Therapy" at ClinicalTrials.gov
^Clinical trial number NCT01554787 for "Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Control Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Astragalus Membranaceus in the Patients After Stroke With Fatigue" at ClinicalTrials.gov
^Khan M, Sekhon B, Jatana M, Giri S, Gilg AG, Sekhon C, et al. (May 2004). "Administration of N-acetylcysteine after focal cerebral ischemia protects brain and reduces inflammation in a rat model of experimental stroke". Journal of Neuroscience Research. 76 (4): 519–527. doi:10.1002/jnr.20087. PMID15114624. S2CID38505912.
^Clinical trial number NCT01976936 for "A Phase 2 Safety Study in Which Ischemic Stroke Patients Will be Randomized Within 24 Hours of Symptom Onset to Placebo or Oral Lovastatin 640 mg Per Day for 3 Days. " at ClinicalTrials.gov
^Henninger N, Bouley J, Nelligan JM, Sicard KM, Fisher M (September 2007). "Normobaric hyperoxia delays perfusion/diffusion mismatch evolution, reduces infarct volume, and differentially affects neuronal cell death pathways after suture middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats". Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 27 (9): 1632–1642. doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600463. PMID17311078. S2CID34948648.
^Clinical trial number NCT02248233 for "Nimodipine for Treating Acute Massive Cerebral Infarction: a Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Clinical Study" at ClinicalTrials.gov
^Clinical trial number NCT01220622 for "Nimodipine Preventing Cognitive Impairment in Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial (NICE)" at ClinicalTrials.gov
^Clinical trial number NCT02430350 for "Compound Edaravone Injection for Acute Ischemic Stroke, a Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel, and Active-controlled Phase III Trial" at ClinicalTrials.gov
^Woitzik J, Weinzierl N, Schilling L (July 2005). "Early administration of a second-generation perfluorochemical decreases ischemic brain damage in a model of permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat". Neurological Research. 27 (5): 509–515. doi:10.1179/016164105X15677. PMID15978177. S2CID21813111.
^Clinical trial number NCT04091945 for "A Phase IIa, Double-Blind, Single Dose, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Potential Efficacy of LT3001 Drug Product in Subjects With Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) " at ClinicalTrials.gov
^Clinical trial number NCT01221246 for "A Phase 2 Double Blinded, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Dose Escalation Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and the Safety of GM602 in Patients With Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Ischemic Stroke Within an 18-hour Treatment Window" at ClinicalTrials.gov
^Clinical trial number NCT02446977 for "Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate Whether Administration of CBG000592 (Riboflavin/Vitamin B2) in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Causes a Reduction of Glutamate-mediated Excitotoxicity " at ClinicalTrials.gov
^Beer C, Blacker D, Bynevelt M, Hankey GJ, Puddey IB (February 2012). "A randomized placebo controlled trial of early treatment of acute ischemic stroke with atorvastatin and irbesartan". International Journal of Stroke. 7 (2): 104–111. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00653.x. PMID22044557. S2CID21245997.
^Clinical trial number NCT00827190 for "Ascending Single Dose Study Of The Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, And Pharmacodynamics Of ILS-920 Administered Intravenously To Healthy Adult Subjects" at ClinicalTrials.gov