Carnivora

For information on all meat-eating organisms, see Carnivores. For the alternative medicine "Carnivorans", see Venus flytrap § In alternative medicine.

Carnivorans Temporal range: 51.88–0 Ma PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N Early Eocene-Holocene[1]
Various carnivorans, with feliforms to the left, and caniforms to the right
Scientific classification
Domain:	Eukaryota
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Class:	Mammalia
Clade:	Carnivoramorpha
Clade:	Carnivoraformes
Order:	Carnivora Bowdich, 1821[2]
Suborders
Caniformia Feliformia
The extant distribution and density of Carnivora species.
Synonyms
list of synonyms: Caniformes (Zagorodniuk, 2008)[3][4] Carnaria (Haeckel, 1866)[5] Carnassidentia (Wortman, 1901)[6] Carnivoramorphia (Kalandadze & Rautian, 1992)[7] Carnivores (Cuvier, 1817)[8] Carnivori (Vieq d'Azyr, 1792)[9] Carnivorida (Pearse, 1936)[10][11] Carnivoriformes (Kinman, 1994)[12] Carnivoripedida (Vyalov, 1966)[13] Cynofeliformia (Ginsburg, 1982) Cynofeloidea (Hough, 1953)[14] Cynosia (Rafinesque, 1815)[15] Digitigrada (Illiger, 1811)[16] Digitigradae (Gray, 1821)[17] Eucarnivora (Mekayev, 2002)[18] Ferae (Linnaeus, 1758)[19] Fissipeda (Blumenbach, 1791)[20] Neocarnivora (Radinsky, 1977)[21] Plantigrada (Illiger, 1811)

Carnivora (/kɑːrˈnɪvərə/ kar-NIH-vər-ə) is an order of placental mammals that have specialized in primarily eating flesh, whose members are formally referred to as carnivorans. The order Carnivora is the sixth largest order of mammals,[22] comprising at least 279 species on every major landmass and in a variety of habitats, ranging from the cold polar regions of Earth to the hyper-arid region of the Sahara Desert and the open seas. Carnivorans exhibit a wide array of body plans, varying greatly in size and shape.

Carnivora are divided into two suborders, the Feliformia, containing the true felids and several "cat-like" animals; and the Caniformia, containing the true canids and many "dog-like" animals. The feliforms include the Felidae, Viverridae, hyena, and mongoose families, the majority of which live only in the Old World; cats are the only exception, occurring in the old world and the new world, entering the Americas via the Bering Land Bridge. The caniforms include the Caninae, Procyonidae, bears, mustelids, skunks and pinnipeds that occur worldwide with immense diversity in their morphology, diet and behavior.

Etymology

The word Carnivora is derived from Latin carō (stem carn-) 'flesh' and vorāre 'to devour'.

Phylogeny

The oldest known carnivoran line mammals (Carnivoramorpha) appeared in North America 6 million years after the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event.[23][24] These early ancestors of carnivorans would have resembled small weasel or genet-like mammals, occupying a nocturnal shift on the forest floor or in the trees, as other groups of mammals like the mesonychians and later the creodonts were occupying the megafaunal faunivorous niche. However, following the extinction of mesonychians and the oxyaenid creodonts at the end of the Eocene, carnivorans quickly moved into this niche, with forms like the nimravids being the dominant large-bodied ambush predators during the Oligocene alongside the hyaenodont creodonts (which similarly produced larger, more open-country forms at the start of the Oligocene). By the time Miocene epoch appeared, most if not all of the major lineages and families of carnivorans had diversified and become the most dominant group of large terrestrial predators in Eurasia and North America, with various lineages being successful in megafaunal faunivorous niches at different intervals during the Miocene and later epochs.

Systematics

Evolution

Life reconstruction of Tapocyon robustus, a species of miacid

The order Carnivora belongs to a group of mammals known as Laurasiatheria, which also includes other groups such as bats and ungulates.[25][26] Within this group the carnivorans are placed in the clade Ferae. Ferae includes the closest extant relative of carnivorans, the pangolins, as well as several extinct groups of mostly Paleogene carnivorous placentals such as the creodonts, the arctocyonians, and mesonychians.[27] The creodonts were originally thought of as the sister taxon to the carnivorans, perhaps even ancestral to, based on the presence of the carnassial teeth,[28] but the nature of the carnassial teeth is different between the two groups. In carnivorans, the carnassials are positioned near the front of the molar row, while in the creodonts, they are positioned near the back of the molar row,[29] and this suggests a separate evolutionary history and an order-level distinction.[30] In addition, recent phylogenetic analysis suggests that creodonts are more closely related to pangolins while mesonychians might be the sister group to carnivorans and their stem-relatives.[27]

The closest stem-carnivorans are the miacoids. The miacoids include the families Viverravidae and Miacidae, and together the Carnivora and Miacoidea form the stem-clade Carnivoramorpha. The miacoids were small, genet-like carnivoramorphs that occupy a variety of niches such as terrestrial and arboreal habitats. Recent studies have shown a supporting amount of evidence that Miacoidea is an evolutionary grade of carnivoramorphs that, while viverravids are monophyletic basal group, the miacids are paraphyletic in respect to Carnivora (as shown in the phylogeny below).[31][32]

Carnivoramorpha as a whole first appeared in the Paleocene of North America about 60 million years ago.[24] Crown carnivorans first appeared around 42 million years ago in the Middle Eocene.[33] Their molecular phylogeny shows the extant Carnivora are a monophyletic group, the crown group of the Carnivoramorpha.[34] From there carnivorans have split into two clades based on the composition of the bony structures that surround the middle ear of the skull, the cat-like feliforms and the dog-like caniforms.[35] In feliforms, the auditory bullae are double-chambered, composed of two bones joined by a septum. Caniforms have single-chambered or partially divided auditory bullae, composed of a single bone.[36] Initially, the early representatives of carnivorans were small as the creodonts (specifically, the oxyaenids) and mesonychians dominated the apex predator niches during the Eocene, but in the Oligocene, carnivorans became a dominant group of apex predators with the nimravids, and by the Miocene most of the extant carnivoran families have diversified and become the primary terrestrial predators in the Northern Hemisphere.

Classification of the extant carnivorans

See also: List of carnivorans

In 1758, the Swedish botanist Carl Linnaeus placed all carnivorans known at the time into the group Ferae (not to be confused with the modern concept of Ferae which also includes pangolins) in the tenth edition of his book Systema Naturae. He recognized six genera: Canis (canids and hyaenids), Phoca (pinnipeds), Felis (felids), Viverra (viverrids, herpestids, and mephitids), Mustela (non-badger mustelids), Ursus (ursids, large species of mustelids, and procyonids).[19] It was not until 1821 that the English writer and traveler Thomas Edward Bowdich gave the group its modern and accepted name.[2]

Initially, the modern concept of Carnivora was divided into two suborders: the terrestrial Fissipedia and the marine Pinnipedia.[37] Below is the classification of how the extant families were related to each other after American paleontologist George Gaylord Simpson in 1945:[37]

• Order Carnivora Bowdich, 1821
  • Suborder Fissipedia Blumenbach, 1791
    • Superfamily Canoidea G. Fischer de Waldheim, 1817
      • Family Canidae G. Fischer de Waldheim, 1817 – dogs
      • Family Ursidae G. Fischer de Waldheim, 1817 – bears
      • Family Procyonidae Bonaparte, 1850 – raccoons and pandas
      • Family Mustelidae G. Fischer de Waldheim, 1817 – skunks, badgers, otters, and weasels
    • Superfamily Feloidea G. Fischer de Waldheim, 1817
      • Family Viverridae J. E. Gray, 1821 – civets and mongooses
      • Family Hyaenidae J. E. Gray, 1821 – hyenas
      • Family Felidae G. Fischer de Waldheim, 1817 – cats
  • Suborder Pinnipedia Iliger, 1811
    • Family Otariidae J. E. Gray, 1825 – eared seals
    • Family Odobenidae J. A. Allen, 1880 – walrus
    • Family Phocidae J. E. Gray, 1821 – earless seals

Since then, however, the methods in which mammalogists use to assess the phylogenetic relationships among the carnivoran families has been improved with using more complicated and intensive incorporation of genetics, morphology and the fossil record. Research into Carnivora phylogeny since 1945 has found Fisspedia to be paraphyletic in respect to Pinnipedia,[38] with pinnipeds being either more closely related to bears or to weasels.[39][40][41][42][43] The small carnivoran families Viverridae,[44] Procyonidae, and Mustelidae have been found to be polyphyletic:

• Mongooses and a handful of Malagasy endemic species are found to be in a clade with hyenas, with the Malagasy species being in their own family Eupleridae.[45][46][47]
• The African palm civet is a basal cat-like carnivoran.[48]
• The linsang is more closely related to cats.[49]
• Pandas are not procyonids nor are they a natural grouping.[50] The giant panda is a true bear[51][52] while the red panda is a distinct family.[53]
• Skunks and stink badgers are placed in their own family, and are the sister group to a clade containing Ailuridae, Procyonidae and Mustelidae sensu stricto.[54][53]

Below is a table chart of the extant carnivoran families and number of extant species recognized by various authors of the first (2009[55]) and fourth (2014[56]) volumes of the Handbook of the Mammals of the World:

Carnivora Bowdich, 1821
Feliformia Kretzoi, 1945
Nandinioidea Pocock, 1929
Family	English Name	Distribution	Number of Extant Species	Type Taxon	Image Figure
Nandiniidae Pocock, 1929	African palm civet	Sub-Saharan Africa	1	Nandinia binotata (J. E. Gray, 1830)
Feloidea G. Fischer de Waldheim, 1817
Family	English Name	Distribution	Number of Extant Species	Type Taxon	Image Figure
Felidae G. Fischer de Waldheim, 1817	Cats (including domestic cats, tigers, leopards, jaguars, lions, cheetahs, ocelots, etc.)	Americas, Africa, and Eurasia (introduced to Madagascar, Australasia and several islands)	37	Felis catus Linnaeus, 1758
Prionodontidae Horsfield, 1822	Asiatic linsangs	Indomalayan realm	2	Prionodon linsang (Hardwicke, 1821)
Viverroidea J. E. Gray, 1821
Family	English Name	Distribution	Number of Extant Species	Type Taxon	Image Figure
Viverridae J. E. Gray, 1821	Civets, genets, and oyans	Southern Europe, Indomalayan realm, and Africa (introduced to Madagascar)	34	Viverra zibetha Linnaeus, 1758
Herpestoidea Bonaparte, 1845
Family	English Name	Distribution	Number of Extant Species	Type Taxon	Image Figure
Hyaenidae J. E. Gray, 1821	Hyenas	Africa, the Middle East, the Caucasus, Central Asia, and the Indian subcontinent	4	Hyaena hyaena (Linnaeus, 1758)
Herpestidae Bonaparte, 1845	Mongooses	Iberian Peninsula, Africa, the Middle East, the Caucasus, Central Asia, and the Indomalayan realm	34	Herpestes ichneumon (Linnaeus, 1758)
Eupleridae Chenu, 1850	Malagasy mongooses and civets	Madagascar	8	Eupleres goudotii Doyère, 1835
Caniformia Kretzoi, 1945
Canoidea G. Fischer de Waldheim, 1817
Family	English Name	Distribution	Number of Extant Species	Type Taxon	Image Figure
Canidae G. Fischer de Waldheim, 1817	Dogs (including domestic dogs, wolves, foxes, dingoes, jackals, coyotes, etc.)	Americas, Africa, and Eurasia (introduced to Madagascar, Australasia and several islands)	35	Canis familiaris Linnaeus, 1758
Ursoidea G. Fischer de Waldheim, 1817
Family	English Name	Distribution	Number of Extant Species	Type Taxon	Image Figure
Ursidae G. Fischer de Waldheim, 1817	Bears	Americas and Eurasia	8	Ursus arctos Linnaeus, 1758
Phocoidea J. E. Gray, 1821
Family	English Name	Distribution	Number of Extant Species	Type Taxon	Image Figure
Odobenidae J. A. Allen, 1880	Walruses	The North Pole in the Arctic Ocean and subarctic seas of the Northern Hemisphere	1	Odobenus rosmarus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Otariidae J. E. Gray, 1825	Eared seals	Subpolar, temperate, and equatorial waters throughout the Pacific and Southern Oceans and the southern Indian and Atlantic Oceans	15	Otaria flavescens (Shaw, 1800)
Phocidae J. E. Gray, 1821	Earless seals	The sea and Lake Baikal	18	Phoca vitulina Linnaeus, 1758
Musteloidea G. Fischer de Waldheim, 1817
Family	English Name	Distribution	Number of Extant Species	Type Taxon	Image Figure
Mephitidae Bonaparte, 1845	Skunks and stink badgers	Americas, western Philippines, and Indonesia and Malaysia	12	Mephitis mephitis (Schreber, 1776)
Ailuridae J. E. Gray, 1843	Red panda	Eastern Himalayas and southwestern China	1	Ailurus fulgens F. Cuvier, 1825
Procyonidae J. E. Gray, 1825	Raccoons, olingos, ringtails, coatis, cacomistles, and kinkajous	Americas (introduced to Europe, the Caucasus, and Japan)	12	Procyon lotor (Linnaeus, 1758)
Mustelidae G. Fischer de Waldheim, 1817	Weasels, otters, wolverines, polecats, badgers, martens, and grisons	Americas, Africa, and Eurasia (introduced to Australasia and several islands)	57	Mustela erminea Linnaeus, 1758

Anatomy

Skull

Skull of a fossa (Cryptoprocta ferox). Note the large and conical canine and carnassial teeth common in feliforms.

The canine teeth are usually large, conical, thick and stress resistant. All of the terrestrial species of carnivorans have three incisors on each side of each jaw (the exception is the sea otter (Enhydra lutris) which only has two lower incisor teeth).[57] The third molar has been lost. The carnassial pair is made up of the fourth upper premolar and the first lower molar teeth. Like most mammals, the dentition is heterodont, though in some species, such as the aardwolf (Proteles cristata), the teeth have been greatly reduced and the cheek teeth are specialised for eating insects. In pinnipeds, the teeth are homodont as they have evolved to grasp or catch fish, and the cheek teeth are often lost.[58] In bears and raccoons, the carnassial pair is secondarily reduced.[58] The skulls are heavily built with a strong zygomatic arch. Often a sagittal crest is present, sometimes more evident in sexually dimorphic species such as sea lions and fur seals, though it has also been greatly reduced in some small carnivorans.[58] The braincase is enlarged with the frontoparietal bone at the front. In most species, the eyes are at the front of the face. In caniforms, the rostrum is usually long with many teeth, while in feliforms it is shorter with fewer teeth. The carnassial teeth of feliforms are generally more sectional than those of caniforms.

The turbinates are large and complex in comparison to other mammals, providing a large surface area for olfactory receptors.[58]

Postcranial region

A black-backed jackal (Lupulella mesomelas) trying to predate on a brown fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus) pup. These two species illustrate the diversity in bodyplan seen among carnivorans, especially between pinnipeds and their terrestrial relatives.

Aside from an accumulation of characteristics in the dental and cranial features, not much of their overall anatomy unites carnivorans as a group.[57] All species of carnivorans are quadrupedal and most have five digits on the front feet and four digits on the back feet. In terrestrial carnivorans, the feet have soft pads. The feet can either be digitigrade as seen in cats, hyenas and dogs or plantigrade as seen in bears, skunks, raccoons, weasels, civets and mongooses. In pinnipeds, the limbs have been modified into flippers.

Members of the Carnivora order, like this tiger, have pads on their feet.

Unlike cetaceans and sirenians, which have fully functional tails to help them swim, pinnipeds use their limbs underwater to swim. Earless seals use their back flippers; sea lions and fur seals use their front flippers, and the walrus uses all of its limbs. As a result, pinnipeds have significantly shorter tails than other carnivorans.

Aside from the pinnipeds, dogs, bears, hyenas, and cats all have distinct and recognizable appearances. Dogs are usually cursorial mammals and are gracile in appearance, often relying on their teeth to hold prey; bears are much larger and rely on their physical strength to forage for food. Compared to dogs and bears, cats have longer and stronger forelimbs armed with retractable claws to hold on to prey. Hyenas are dog-like feliforms that have sloping backs due to their front legs being longer than their hind legs. The raccoon family and red panda are small, bear-like carnivorans with long tails. The other small carnivoran families Nandiniidae, Prionodontidae, Viverridae, Herpestidae, Eupleridae, Mephitidae and Mustelidae have through convergent evolution maintained the small, ancestral appearance of the miacoids, though there is some variation seen such as the robust and stout physicality of badgers and the wolverine (Gulo gulo).[57]

Most carnivoran species have a well-defined breeding season.[59] Male carnivorans usually have bacula, which are absent in hyenas and binturongs.[60]

The length and density of the fur vary depending on the environment that the species inhabits. In warm climate species, the fur is often short in length and lighter. In cold climate species, the fur is either dense or long, often with an oily substance that helps to retain heat. The pelage coloration differs between species, often including black, white, orange, yellow, red, and many shades of grey and brown. Some are striped, spotted, blotched, banded, or otherwise boldly patterned. There seems to be a correlation between habitat and color pattern; for example spotted or banded species tend to be found in heavily forested environments.[57] Some species like the grey wolf are polymorphic with different individual having different coat colors. The arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) and the stoat (Mustela erminea) have fur that changes from white and dense in the winter to brown and sparse in the summer. In pinnipeds and polar bears, a thick insulating layer of blubber helps maintain their body temperature.

Sexual dimorphism

This section is an excerpt from Sexual dimorphism in Carnivorans.[edit]

Sexual dimorphism in pinnipeds particularly elephant seals is the most pronounced among Carnivorans.

Sexual dimorphism in lions is the most prominent among felids

Sexual dimorphism is the condition where sexes of the same species exhibit different morphological characteristics, particularly characteristics not directly involved in reproduction.[61] Sexual dimorphism in carnivorans, in which males are larger than females, is common. Sexual selection is frequently cited as the cause of the intraspecific divergence in body proportions and craniomandibular morphology between the sexes within the Carnivora order.[62][63] It is anticipated that animals with polygynous mating systems and high levels of territoriality and solitary behavior will exhibit the highest levels of sexual size dimorphism. Pinnipeds offer an illustration for this.

Relationship with humans

Carnivorans are arguably the group of mammals of most interest to humans. The dog is noteworthy for not only being the first species of carnivoran to be domesticated, but also the first species of any taxon. In the last 10,000 to 12,000 years, humans have selectively bred dogs for a variety of different tasks and today there are well over 400 breeds. The cat is another domesticated carnivoran and it is today considered one of the most successful species on the planet, due to their close proximity to humans and the popularity of cats as pets. Many other species are popular, and they are often charismatic megafauna. Many civilizations have incorporated a species of carnivoran into their culture: a prominent example is the lion, viewed as a symbol of power and royalty in many societies. Yet many species such as wolves and the big cats have been broadly hunted, resulting in extirpation in some areas. Habitat loss and human encroachment as well as climate change have been the primary cause of many species going into decline. Four species of carnivorans have gone extinct since the 1600s: Falkland Island wolf (Dusicyon australis) in 1876; the sea mink (Neogale macrodon) in 1894; the Japanese sea lion (Zalophus japonicus) in 1951 and the Caribbean monk seal (Neomonachus tropicalis) in 1952.[23] Some species such as the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and stoat (Mustela erminea) have been introduced to Australasia and have caused many native species to become endangered or even extinct.[64]

See also

• Mammal classification
• Carnivoraformes
• List of carnivorans
• List of carnivorans by population

References

1. Foley, N. M.; Mason, V. C.; Harris, A. J.; Bredemeyer, K. R.; Damas, J.; Lewin, H. A.; Eizirik, E.; Gatesy, J.; Karlsson, E. K.; Lindblad-Toh, K.; Zoonomia Consortium; Springer, M. S.; Murphy, W. J. (2023). "A genomic timescale for placental mammal evolution". Science. 380 (6643). eabl8189. doi:10.1126/science.abl8189. PMC 10233747. PMID 37104581.
2. Bowditch, T. E. 1821. An analysis of the natural classifications of Mammalia for the use of students and travelers J. Smith Paris. 115. (refer pages 24, 33)
3. Zagorodniuk, I. (2008) "Scientific names of mammal orders: from descriptive to uniform" Visnyk of Lviv University, Biology series, Is. 48. P. 33–43
4. Zagorodniuk, I. (2014) "Changes In Taxonomic Diversity Of Ukrainian Mammals For The Last Three Centuries: Extinct, Phantom And Alien Species" Proceedings of the Theriological School, Vol. 12: 3–16
5. Haeckel, Ernst (1866.) "Generelle Morphologie der Organismen." Berlin: Georg Reimer.
6. J. L. Wortman (1901.) "Studies of Eocene Mammalia in the Marsh Collection, Peabody Museum." The American Journal of Science, series 4 12:193-206
7. Kalandadze, N. N. and S. A. Rautian (1992.) "Systema mlekopitayushchikh i istorygeskaya zoogeographei [The system of mammals and historical zoogeography]." Sbornik Trudov Zoologicheskogo Muzeya Moskovskogo Goschdarstvennoro Universiteta 29:44–152.
8. Georges Cuvier, Pierre André Latreille (1817.) "Le Règne Animal Distribué d'après son Organisation, pour Servir de Base à l'Histoire Naturelle des Animaux et d'Introduction à l'Anatomie Comparée" Déterville libraire, Imprimerie de A. Belin, Paris, 4 Volumes
9. Félix Vicq-Dazyr (1792.) "Encyclopédie Méthodique, Vol. 2: Système Anatomique, Quadrupèdes" Panckoucke
10. Arthur Sperry Pearse, (1936) "Zoological names. A list of phyla, classes, and orders, prepared for section F, American Association for the Advancement of Science" American Association for the Advancement of Science
11. G. G. Simpson (1952) "For and Against Uniform Endings in Zoological Nomenclature" in "Systematic Zoology Vol. 1, No. 1 (Spring, 1952)", pp. 20–23, Published By: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
12. Kenneth E. Kinman (1994.) "The Kinman System: Toward a Stable Cladisto-Eclectic Classification of Organisms: Living and Extinct, 48 Phyla, 269 Classes, 1,719 Orders", Hays, Kan. (P. O. Box 1377, Hays 67601), 88 pages
13. O. S. Vyalov (1966.) "Sledy Zhiznedeyatel'nosti Organizmov i ikh Paleontologicheskoye Znacheniye [Traces of Vital Activity of Organisms and their Paleontological Significance]" Naukova Dumka, Kyiv, 1-219
14. Hough, J. R. (1953.) "Auditory region in North American fossil Felidae: Its significance in phylogeny." United States Geological SurveyProfessional Papers, 243-G,95–115.
15. Rafinesque, Constantine Samuel (1815). "Analyse de la Nature ou tableau de l'univers et des corps organisés". 1815. Palermo, Aux dépens de l'auteur, 223 pp. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
16. Johann Karl Wilhelm Illiger (1811.) "Prodromus Systematis Mammalium et Avium." Berlin: Sumptibus C. Salfeld, xviii, 301 pages
17. Gray, J. E. (1821). "On the natural arrangement of vertebrose animals". London Medical Repository. 15 (1): 296–310.
18. Mekayev, Y. A. (2002.) "The faunagenesis and classification of mammals." Petrov’s Academy of Sciences and Arts, St. Petersburg, 1–895.
19. Linnaeus, C. (1758). Sistema naturae per regna tria Naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus differentiis, synonimis locis. Tomus I. Impensis direct. Laurentii Salvii, Holmia. pp. 20–32.
20. Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1791.) "Handbuch der Naturgeschichte. Vierte auflage." Göttingen, Johann Christian Dieterich, xii+704+[33] pp., 3 pls.
21. Leonard Radinsky (1977.) "Brains of early carnivores." Paleobiology, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp. 333 – 349
22. "Higher Taxonomy". ASM Mammal Diversity Database. American Society of Mammalogy. Retrieved 22 August 2024.
23. Hunter, L. (2018). Field Guide to Carnivores of the World. Bloomsbury Wildlife. pp. 1–271. ISBN 978-1472950796.
24. Polly, David, Gina D. Wesley-Hunt, Ronald E. Heinrich, Graham Davis and Peter Houde (2006). "Earliest known carnivoran auditory bulla and support for a recent origin of crown-clade carnivora (Eutheria, Mammalia)". Palaeontology. 49 (5): 1019–1027. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00586.x.
25. Waddell, Peter J.; Okada, Norihiro; Hasegawa, Masami (1999). "Towards Resolving the Interordinal Relationships of Placental Mammals". Systematic Biology. 48 (1): 1–5. doi:10.1093/sysbio/48.1.1. PMID 12078634.
26. Tsagkogeorga, G; Parker, J; Stupka, E; Cotton, J.A.; Rossiter, S.J. (2013). "Phylogenomic analyses elucidate the evolutionary relationships of bats". Current Biology. 23 (22): 2262–2267. Bibcode:2013CBio...23.2262T. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.09.014. PMID 24184098.
27. Halliday, Thomas J. D.; Upchurch, Paul; Goswami, Anjali (2015). "Resolving the relationships of Paleocene placental mammals" (PDF). Biological Reviews. 92 (1): 521–550. doi:10.1111/brv.12242. ISSN 1464-7931. PMC 6849585. PMID 28075073. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
28. McKenna, M. C. (1975). "Toward a phylogenetic classification of the Mammalia". In Luckett, W. P.; Szalay, F. S. (eds.). Phylogeny of the Primates. New York: Plenum. pp. 21–46.
29. Feldhamer, George A.; Drickamer, Lee C.; Vessey, Stephen H.; Merritt, Joseph F.; Krajewski, Carey (2015). Mammalogy: Adaptation, Diversity, Ecology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 356. ISBN 978-0801886959.
30. Turner, Alan; Antón, Mauricio (2004). Evolving Eden: An Illustrated Guide to the Evolution of the African Large-Mammal Fauna. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 77. ISBN 978-0-231-11944-3.
31. Bryant, H.N., and M. Wolson (2004) “Phylogenetic Nomenclature of Carnivoran Mammals.” First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting. Paris, Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle
32. John J. Flynn; John A. Finarelli; Michelle Spaulding (2010). "Phylogeny of the Carnivora and Carnivoramorpha, and the use of the fossil record to enhance understanding of evolutionary transformations". In Anjali Goswami; Anthony Friscia (eds.). Carnivoran evolution. New views on phylogeny, form and function. Cambridge University Press. pp. 25–63. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139193436.003. ISBN 9781139193436.
33. Heinrich, R.E.; Strait, S.G.; Houde, P. (January 2008). "Earliest Eocene Miacidae (Mammalia: Carnivora) from northwestern Wyoming". Journal of Paleontology. 82 (1): 154–162. Bibcode:2008JPal...82..154H. doi:10.1666/05-118.1. S2CID 35030667.
34. Eizirik, E.; Murphy, W.J.; Koepfli, K.P.; Johnson, W.E.; Dragoo, J.W.; O'Brien, S.J. (July 2010). "Pattern and timing of the diversification of the mammalian order Carnivora inferred from multiple nuclear gene sequences". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 56 (1): 49–63. Bibcode:2010MolPE..56...49E. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2010.01.033. PMC 7034395. PMID 20138220.
35. Wang, X.; Tedford, R. H. (2008). Dogs: Their Fossil Relatives and Evolutionary History. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 1–232. ISBN 978-0-231-13529-0.
36. R. F. Ewer (1973). The Carnivores. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-8014-8493-6.
37. Simpson, G.G. (1945). "The principles of classification and a classification of mammals". Bulletin of the AMNH. 85: 1–350. hdl:2246/1104.
38. Arnason, U.; Gullberg, A.; Janke, A.; Kullberg, M. (2007). "Mitogenomic analyses of caniform relationships". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 45 (3): 863–74. Bibcode:2007MolPE..45..863A. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2007.06.019. PMID 17919938.
39. Lento, G. M.; Hickson, R. E.; Chambers, G. K.; Penny, D. (1995). "Use of spectral analysis to test hypotheses on the origin of pinnipeds". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 12 (1): 28–52. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040189. PMID 7877495.
40. Hunt, R. M. Jr.; Barnes, L. G. (1994). "Basicranial evidence for ursid affinity of the oldest pinnipeds" (PDF). Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History. 29: 57–67.
41. Higdon, J. W.; Bininda-Emonds, O. R.; Beck, R. M.; Ferguson, S. H. (2007). "Phylogeny and divergence of the pinnipeds (Carnivora: Mammalia) assessed using a multigene dataset". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 7 (1): 216. Bibcode:2007BMCEE...7..216H. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-216. PMC 2245807. PMID 17996107.
42. Sato, J. J.; Wolsan, M.; Suzuki, H.; Hosoda, T.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Hiyama, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Minami, S. (2006). "Evidence from nuclear DNA sequences sheds light on the phylogenetic relationships of Pinnipedia: Single origin with affinity to Musteloidea". Zoological Science. 23 (2): 125–46. doi:10.2108/zsj.23.125. hdl:2115/13508. PMID 16603806. S2CID 25795496.
43. Flynn, J. J.; Finarelli, J. A.; Zehr, S.; Hsu, J.; Nedbal, M. A. (2005). "Molecular phylogeny of the Carnivora (Mammalia): Assessing the impact of increased sampling on resolving enigmatic relationships". Systematic Biology. 54 (2): 317–37. doi:10.1080/10635150590923326. PMID 16012099.
44. Gaubert, P.; Veron, G. (2003). "Exhaustive sample set among Viverridae reveals the sister-group of felids: the linsangs as a case of extreme morphological convergence within Feliformia". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 270 (1532): 2523–2530. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2521. PMC 1691530. PMID 14667345.
45. Anne D. Yoder and John J. Flynn 2003: Origin of Malagasy Carnivora
46. Yoder, A., M. Burns, S. Zehr, T. Delefosse, G. Veron, S. Goodman, J. Flynn. 2003: Single origin of Malagasy Carnivora from an African ancestor – Letters to Nature
47. Philippe Gaubert, W. Chris Wozencraft, Pedro Cordeiro-Estrela and Géraldine Veron. 2005 – Mosaics of Convergences and Noise in Morphological Phylogenies: What's in a Viverrid-Like Carnivoran?
48. Eizirik, E.; Murphy, W. J.; Koepfli, K. P.; Johnson, W. E.; Dragoo, J. W.; Wayne, R. K.; O'Brien, S. J. (2010). "Pattern and timing of diversification of the mammalian order Carnivora inferred from multiple nuclear gene sequences". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 56 (1): 49–63. Bibcode:2010MolPE..56...49E. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2010.01.033. PMC 7034395. PMID 20138220.
49. Gaubert, P. (2009). "Family Prionodontidae (Linsangs)". In Wilson, D.E.; Mittermeier, R.A. (eds.). Handbook of the Mammals of the World – Volume 1. Barcelona: Lynx Ediciones. pp. 170–173. ISBN 978-84-96553-49-1.
50. Salesa, M.; M. Antón; S. Peigné; J. Morales (2006). "Evidence of a false thumb in a fossil carnivore clarifies the evolution of pandas". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 103 (2): 379–382. Bibcode:2006PNAS..103..379S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0504899102. PMC 1326154. PMID 16387860.
51. Yu, Li; Li, Yi-Wei; Ryder, Oliver A.; Zhang, Ya-Ping (2007). "Analysis of complete mitochondrial genome sequences increases phylogenetic resolution of bears (Ursidae), a mammalian family that experienced rapid speciation". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 7 (198): 198. Bibcode:2007BMCEE...7..198Y. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-198. PMC 2151078. PMID 17956639.
52. Krause, J.; Unger, T.; Noçon, A.; Malaspinas, A.; Kolokotronis, S.; Stiller, M.; Soibelzon, L.; Spriggs, H.; Dear, P. H.; Briggs, A. W.; Bray, S. C. E.; O'Brien, S. J.; Rabeder, G.; Matheus, P.; Cooper, A.; Slatkin, M.; Pääbo, S.; Hofreiter, M. (2008). "Mitochondrial genomes reveal an explosive radiation of extinct and extant bears near the Miocene-Pliocene boundary". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 8 (220): 220. Bibcode:2008BMCEE...8..220K. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-220. PMC 2518930. PMID 18662376.
53. Mehta, R. S.; Slater, G. J.; Law, C. J. (2018). "Lineage Diversity and Size Disparity in Musteloidea: Testing Patterns of Adaptive Radiation Using Molecular and Fossil-Based Methods". Systematic Biology. 67 (1): 127–144. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syx047. ISSN 1063-5157. PMID 28472434.
54. Koepfli KP, Deere KA, Slater GJ, et al. (2008). "Multigene phylogeny of the Mustelidae: Resolving relationships, tempo and biogeographic history of a mammalian adaptive radiation". BMC Biol. 6: 4–5. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-6-10. PMC 2276185. PMID 18275614.
55. Wilson, D.E.; Mittermeier, R.A., eds. (2009). Handbook of the Mammals of the World – Volume 1. Barcelona: Lynx Ediciones. pp. 1–728. ISBN 978-84-96553-49-1.
56. Wilson, D.E.; Mittermeier, R.A., eds. (2014). Handbook of the Mammals of the World – Volume 4. Barcelona: Lynx Ediciones. pp. 1–614. ISBN 978-84-96553-93-4.
57. Nowak, R. M. (2005). Walker's Carnivores of the World. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 1–328. ISBN 0801880335.
58. Vaughan, T. A.; Ryan, J. M.; Czaplewski, N. J. (2013). Mammalogy. Burlington, Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Learning. pp. 1–750. ISBN 9781284032093.
59. Knobil, Ernst (2006). Knobil and Neill's Physiology of Reproduction. Gulf Professional Publishing. ISBN 978-0-12-515401-7.
60. Schultz, Nicholas G.; Lough-Stevens, Michael; Abreu, Eric; Orr, Teri; Dean, Matthew D. (1 June 2016). "The Baculum was Gained and Lost Multiple Times during Mammalian Evolution". Integrative and Comparative Biology. 56 (4): 644–56. doi:10.1093/icb/icw034. ISSN 1540-7063. PMC 6080509. PMID 27252214.
61. Encyclopedia of Animal Behaviour. Vol. 2. Academic Press. 21 January 2019. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-12-813252-4.
62. Gittleman, J. L.; Valkenburgh, B. Van (May 1997). "Sexual dimorphism in the canines and skulls of carnivores: effects of size, phylogency, and behavioural ecology". Journal of Zoology. 242 (1): 97–117. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1997.tb02932.x. ISSN 0952-8369.
63. Sylvia Brunner, Michael M Bryden, Peter D. Shaughnessy (September 2004). "Cranial ontogeny of otariid seals". Systematics and Biodiversity. 2 (1): 83–110. Bibcode:2004SyBio...2...83B. doi:10.1017/S1477200004001367. S2CID 83737300.
64. "100 of the World's Worst Invasive Species". Invasive Species Specialist Group.

External links

• High-Resolution Images of Carnivore Brains