At the end of 2008, his book Macedonia and the Macedonians: A History was published. He authored a monograph on Russian foreign policy in the Balkans titled Russia and the Balkans: Inter-Balkan Rivalries and Russian Foreign Policy, 1908–1914.
In his book, Macedonia and the Macedonians: A History, Rossos’ account starts from 600 BC and ends in 2001 AD. He identifies two "golden ages" of the Macedonians, namely the periods during the Alexander the Great's empire, which he sees as non-Greek and "the first Macedonian state",[5][6] and Tsar Samuil's Empire which he sees as another "Macedonian empire".[5][7] He also identifies three "dark ages" of the Macedonians, namely thirteen centuries of Greek-Roman-Byzantine-Bulgarian rule, half a millennium under Ottoman rule and a "Greek-Serbian-Bulgarian occupation" from 1913 to 1944. Rossos describes World War II to today again as luminous. In the book, he also describes "innovative thrusts of Macedonian culture", such as the effect of Cyril and Methodius, who Rossos sees as ethnic Macedonians.[5]
Rossos is an adherent of some controversial views espoused by the historiography in North Macedonia.[1][5] For example, he has adopted the fringe theory of the continuity between the ancient and the modern Macedonians.[9][10] He also espoused that Macedonian national identity was already well developed before WWII, a dubious view, especially for the Bulgarian part of the Macedonian population.[11][12][13][14] He has been described by anthropologist Loring Danforth as one of the more "moderate" Macedonian scholars who nevertheless implies a "vague form of historical or cultural continuity between the ancient and the modern Macedonians in what is ultimately a form of nationalist historiography".[9] Per historian Stefan Troebst, Rossos has clearly and consciously taken sides with the historians and politicians of the Republic of Macedonia (now North Macedonia), and states that his works suffer from what he calls "Makedonianismus" (Macedonism).[5] According to Danforth, "Rossos’s implicit suggestion of a continuity linking ‘the first Macedonian state’ of antiquity with the modern Macedonian state of the twentieth century could be interpreted as a subtle attempt to counter the more convincing Greek claims for cultural continuity with Alexander the Great and the ancient Macedonians".[9] Professor of international relations Aristotle Tziampiris criticizes Rossos' claim of a "huge" Macedonian minority in Greece, possibly numbering to more than 100,000s, pointing out that the Rainbow Party, a party aiming primarily to exert pressure in order to secure minority rights and amend what it perceives as human rights violations against Slavic-speakers who self-identify as ethnic Macedonians, never gained more than 10,000 votes, or 0.1% of the entire Greek population.[15]
Bibliography
"The Disintegration of Yugoslavia, Macedonia's Independence, and Stability in the Balkans." In War and Change in the Balkans: Nationalism, Conflict, and Cooperation, edited by Brad K. Blitz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Rossos, Andrew (2000). "Great Britain and Macedonian Statehood and Unification, 1940–49". East European Politics and Societies. 14 (1): 119–142. doi:10.1177/0888325400014001006. S2CID144297050.
Rossos, Andrew (1997). "Incompatible Allies: Greek Communism and Macedonian Nationalism in the Civil War in Greece, 1943–1949". Journal of Modern History. 69 (1): 42–76. doi:10.1086/245440. S2CID143512864.
"The British Foreign Office and Macedonian National Identity, 1918-1941." In National Character and National Ideology in Interwar Eastern Europe, edited by Ivo Banac and Katherine Verdey. New Haven: Yale Center for International and Area Studies, 1995.
"The Macedonians of Aegean Macedonia: A British Officer's Report, 1944". Slavonic and East European Review. 69 (2): 282–309. 1991.
^ ab"Canadian-Macedonian historian Andrew Rossos is credited as having published ‘the first professional English language overview of the history of Macedonia, although the historian Stefan Troebst suggests that his ‘teleologic portrayal is negatively affected by the Skopjan view of history’ and thus is considered a pro-Macedonian nationalist account, representing the latest developments in Macedonian historiography." For more see: The Historical Association, Teaching history journal, March 2015, The Democratisation of the Macedonian Question, Adrienne Wright Smith’s Hill High School Wollongong, HTA extension essay price 2014 – 1st place. p. 49.
^Македонска енциклопедија. Скопје, 2009, т.ІІ, p. 1282.
^ abcdePer Troebst Rossos' teleological representation, suffers from the fixation on what he calls "Macedonianism" ("Macedonism"), that is, in the source-wise weakly and sporadically supported view... Rossos excludes, and like the science of history in Skopje, puts occasional expressions of individual representatives of the small intellectual elites of the southern Slavs of Ottoman Macedonia in a fragile continuity line in exile in Russia, Western Europe or Bulgaria to support the Macedonian thesis... The counterpart of this selective approach is to hide such strands of development and events that do not fit into this interpretation scheme. This is especially true for the ethno-nationally Bulgarian-defining part of the Macedonian movement – Macedonian Bulgarians. For more see: Recension from Professor Stefan Troebst about Rossos's book: Macedonia and the Macedonians. A History, 2008
^ abcJoseph Roisman, Ian Worthington ed., A Companion to Ancient Macedonia, Volume 84 of Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World, John Wiley & Sons, 2011, ISBN144435163X, p. 581.
^Lampe, John R.; Iordachi, Constantin (2020). Battling over the Balkans: Historiographical Questions and Controversies. Central European University Press. p. 7. ISBN978-963-386-326-8.
^Ana S. Trbovich, A Legal Geography of Yugoslavia's Disintegration, Oxford University Press, 2008, ISBN0199715475, p. 104.
^Tchavdar Marinov and Alexander Vezenkov, Communism and Nationalism in the Balkans: Marriage of Convenience or Mutual Attraction? in Entangled Histories of the Balkans – Volume Two, ISBN9789004261914, BRILL, 2013, pp.: 501–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004261914_007
^Илко Дренков. Великобритания и Македонският въпрос (1919–1949), Македонски научен институт, София, 2017, ISBN6197377012, стр. 9-10; Ilko Drenkov, British Foreign Office Documents on the Macedonian Question, 1919-1941, Anthem Press, 2021, ISBN9781785277269, p. xi.