|
ৱিকিপিডিয়া:উল্লেখযোগ্যতা
এই পৃষ্ঠাটো এটা প্ৰবন্ধৰ উল্লেখযোগ্যতাৰ নিৰ্দেশনা সম্পৰ্কে। উল্লেখযোগ্যতাৰ জাননীৰ বাবে, WP:N/N চাওক। প্ৰবন্ধৰ পাদটীকাৰ বাবে, সহায়:পাদটীকা চাওক।
ৱিকিপিডিয়াত উল্লেখযোগ্যতা হৈছে সম্পাদকসকলে কোনো বিষয়ৰ নিজা প্ৰবন্ধ থাকিব পাৰে নে নাই সেয়া নিৰ্ণয় কৰিবলৈ ব্যৱহাৰ কৰা নীতি। ৱিকিপিডিয়াত থকা যিকোনো তথ্য সত্যাপনযোগ্য (verifiable) হোৱাৰ দৰকাৰ; যদিহে কোনো এটা বিষয়ৰ ওপৰত নিৰ্ভৰযোগ্য আৰু তৃতীয় পক্ষ (third-party)ৰ পৰা তথ্য উৎস পোৱা নাযায়, তেন্তে সেই বিষয়ৰ ওপৰত পৃথককৈ প্ৰৱন্ধ সৃষ্টি কৰা উচিত নহয়। ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ উল্লেখযোগ্যতাৰ ধাৰণাটোৱে বিষয়সমূহৰ বিষম্যহীন অন্তৰ্ভুক্তি (indiscriminate inclusion) এৰাই চলিবলৈ এটা প্ৰাথমিক মানদণ্ড (basic standard) প্ৰয়োগ কৰে। প্ৰবন্ধ আৰু তালিকাৰ বিষয়সমূহ উল্লেখযোগ্য হ'ব লাগিব, বা "জনাৰ যোগ্য (worthy of notice)" হ'ব লাগিব। উল্লেখযোগ্যতা নিৰ্ণয় কৰাটো কেৱল খ্যাতি, গুৰুত্ব বা জনপ্ৰিয়তাৰ দৰে কথাৰ ওপৰত নিৰ্ভৰশীল নহয়। তথাপি এই কাৰকসমূহে নিম্নোল্লিখিত নীতি বা নিৰ্দেশনা পূৰণ কৰি বিষয় এটাৰ গ্ৰহণযোগ্যতা বৃদ্ধি কৰিব পাৰে। এটা বিষয়ৰ ওপৰত ৱিকিপিডিয়াত প্ৰৱন্ধ সৃষ্টি কৰিবলৈ হ'লে ই তলৰ সাধাৰণ উল্লেখযোগ্যতা নিৰ্দেশনা পূৰণ কৰিব লাগিব আৰু যদিহে ৱিকিপিডিয়া কি নহয় ৰ অধীনত তেনে বিষয় এটা বাদ দিয়া নহয়। কোনো এটা বিষয়ে যদি সোঁফালে থকা বাকচটোত তালিকাভুক্ত বিষয়-নিৰ্দিষ্ট নিৰ্দেশনাত উল্লেখ কৰা মাপকাঠী পূৰণ কৰে তেতিয়াও সেই বিষয়টো উল্লেখযোগ্য বুলি ধৰা হয়। These notability guidelines only outline how suitable a topic is for its own article or list. They do not directly limit the content of an article or list. For Wikipedia's policies regarding content, see Neutral point of view, Verifiability, No original research, What Wikipedia is not, and Biographies of living persons. সাধাৰণ উল্লেখযোগ্যতা নিৰ্দেশনাIf a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list.
A topic for which this criterion is deemed to have been met by consensus, is usually worthy of notice, and satisfies one of the criteria for a stand-alone article in the encyclopedia. Verifiable facts and content not supported by multiple independent sources may be appropriate for inclusion within another article. Notability guidelines do not limit content within an articleThe criteria applied to article content are not the same as those applied to article creation. The notability guidelines do not apply to article or list content (with the exception that some lists restrict inclusion to notable items or people). Content coverage within a given article or list is governed by the principle of due weight and other content policies. For additional information about list articles, see Notability and lists and Lead and selection criteria. Notability requires verifiable evidenceThe common theme in the notability guidelines is that there must be verifiable, objective evidence that the subject has received significant attention from independent sources to support a claim of notability. The absence of citations in an article (as distinct from the non-existence of sources) does not indicate that the subject is not notable. No subject is automatically or inherently notable merely because it exists: The evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or recognition, and that this was not a mere short-term interest, nor a result of promotional activity or indiscriminate publicity, nor is the topic unsuitable for any other reason. Sources of evidence include recognized peer reviewed publications, credible and authoritative books, reputable media sources, and other reliable sources generally. Editors evaluating notability should consider not only any sources currently named in an article, but also the possibility of notability-indicating sources that are not currently named in the article. Notability requires only the existence of suitable independent, reliable sources, not their immediate citation. Wikipedia articles are not a final draft, and an article's subject can be notable if such sources exist, even if they have not been named yet. However, once an article's notability has been challenged, merely asserting that unspecified sources exist is seldom persuasive, especially if time passes and actual proof does not surface. If it is likely that significant coverage in independent sources can be found for a topic, deletion due to lack of notability is inappropriate. Notability is not temporaryNotability is not temporary: once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage. While notability itself is not temporary, from time to time re-assessment of the evidence of notability or suitability of existing articles may be requested by any user via a deletion discussion, or new evidence may arise for articles previously deemed unsuitable. As a result articles may be proposed for deletion or recreated months or even years after being earlier considered. In particular, if reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual. Common circumstancesSelf-promotion and indiscriminate publicityPublication in a reliable source is not always good evidence of notability: Wikipedia is not a promotional medium. Self-promotion, paid material, autobiography, and product placement are not valid routes to an encyclopedia article. The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, author, inventor, or vendor) have actually considered the topic notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works of their own that focus upon it – without incentive, promotion, or other influence by people connected to the topic matter. Neutral sources are also needed to guarantee a neutral article can be written—self-published sources cannot be assumed neutral; see Wikipedia:Autobiography and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for discussion of neutrality concerns of such sources. Even non-promotional self-published sources, like technical manuals that accompany a product, are still not evidence of notability as they do not measure the attention a subject has received. Eventsপ্ৰধান পৃষ্ঠা: Wikipedia:Notability (events)
Wikipedia is not a news source: it takes more than just routine news reports about a single event or topic to constitute significant coverage. For example, routine news coverage such as press releases, public announcements, sports coverage, and tabloid journalism is not significant coverage. Even a large number of news reports that provide no critical analysis of the event is not considered significant coverage. The Wikimedia project Wikinews covers topics of present news coverage. In some cases, notability of a controversial entity (such as a book) could arise either because the entity itself was notable, or because the controversy was notable as an event—both need considering. Stand-alone listsঅতিৰিক্ত তথ্য: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (stand-alone lists)
Notability guidelines apply to the inclusion of stand-alone lists and tables. Notability of lists (whether titled as "List of Xs" or "Xs") is based on the group. A list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list. The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been. Because the group or set is notable, the individual items in the list do not need to be independently notable, although editors may, at their discretion, choose to limit the size of large lists by including entries only for items that are independently notable or already have Wikipedia articles. There is no present consensus for how to assess the notability of more complex and cross-categorization lists (such as "Lists of X of Y") or whether there are other means of forming stand-alone lists, although non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations are touched upon in WP:NOT. Editors are still urged to demonstrate list notability via the grouping itself before creating stand-alone lists. Articles not satisfying the notability guidelinesArticles on topics that do not meet this criterion are generally deleted, although there are alternatives. For articles of unclear notability, deletion should be a last resort. If an article fails to cite sufficient sources to demonstrate the notability of its subject, look for sources yourself, or:
If appropriate sources cannot be found after a good-faith search for them, consider merging the article's verifiable content into a broader article providing context.[7] Otherwise, if deleting:[8]
For articles on subjects that are clearly not notable, then deletion is usually the most appropriate response, although other options may help the community to preserve any useful material. See also
Notes
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
