This project is inactive. For better response, please post at Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Poland.
Archives
- /Archive1 - Discussions from May 2004 - April 2006
- /Archive2 - Discussions from May 2006 - April 2008
This page seems very quiet: anyone listening? I have a thought or two about categorisation of the large number of Poland-geo-stubs being created right now, but it's not clear if this is the most useful venue for discussing that... Alai (talk) 01:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe Portal talk:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board would be a more watched venue. I'm the one running the bot which is creating the stubs, so you could also contact me at my talk page.--Kotniski (talk) 08:37, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Some of us are watching it. What is your proposal for the stub categorization?
- Ajh1492 (talk) 02:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The proposal was to categorize village stubs by county instead of by voivodeship. This is now being implemented by the bot.--Kotniski (talk) 08:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm all for categorizing by Powiat/County. Ajh1492 (talk) 17:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Moved the old discussion to an archive subpage (same as the existing archive).
Anyone interested in participating?
Ajh1492 (talk) 13:18, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I'm in.--Kotniski (talk) 08:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Randomocean (talk) 21:22, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd like to help out, but I haven't participated in wikipedia before. I live in Warsaw, and I take a lot of pictures. Any assignments to get me started?
We really need a template for rivers. I re-used the one from the Bug for the Narew & Nurzec.
Ajh1492 (talk) 17:28, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Namely {{Infobox River}}? That seems perfectly OK to me; I don't think we need a different template than that one.--Kotniski (talk) 10:00, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I was thinking of an entry template. I agree that the river Infobox is fine. I'm suggesting the entry template be something along the lines of the one for the Narew. Ajh1492 (talk) 13:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't understand - what do you mean by "entry template"?--Kotniski (talk) 14:15, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- A format to use for all river entries, like this /river Ajh1492 (talk) 17:12, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is it just Kotniski and I (well and Kotbot too)? Ajh1492 (talk) 01:03, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Anyone here? In view of the lack of participation, I think we should just close down this project and combine it with WP:WikiProject Poland.--Kotniski (talk) 17:47, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Done--Kotniski (talk) 09:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. Grodno isn't a village, and I couldn't find that in TERYT. It's sacred spot? -> (Polish uroczysko). JDavid (talk) 01:00, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Not sacred; I've just called it "coastal place" until its status can be clarified.--Kotniski (talk) 09:14, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
At the moment, this project is inactive. For better response, please post at Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Poland.--Kotniski (talk) 09:17, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
