User talk:ZmalluzboyzWelcome!ShehimoDear User:Zmalluzboyz, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially those on the article about the Shehimo. I noticed that you added an image of an Eastern Orthodox icon corner to the article; would you be able to replace that photo with something more suitable to the Oriental Orthodoxy (murals are more characteristic of Indian Orthodox artwork, for example)? If not that's fine. However, I think that this would improve the article. With regards, AnupamTalk 21:34, 21 August 2020 (UTC) Ministry of Liturgical Resource Development moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, Ministry of Liturgical Resource Development, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " Your submission at Articles for creation: Ministry of Liturgical Resource Development (August 26) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Re:Ministry of Liturgical Resource DevelopmentDear User:Zmalluzboyz, thank you for your message on my talk page. I would love to help you expand that article. However, as of now, there do not seem to be enough references that discuss the Liturgical Resource Development. As such, I think that such a submission would most likely be rejected on Wikipedia, unless more sources become available later. I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk 17:03, 26 August 2020 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
A barnstar for you!
Re:A barnstar for you!Dear User:Zmalluzboyz, thank you for the thoughtful barnstar! It has brightened my day and I'm glad to know that my efforts are appreciated on Wikipedia. With warm regards, AnupamTalk 14:46, 30 August 2020 (UTC) August 2020Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Catholicos, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 05:58, 31 August 2020 (UTC) ArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageConcern regarding Draft:Ministry of Liturgical DevelopmentHello, Zmalluzboyz. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ministry of Liturgical Development, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 00:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Ministry of Liturgical DevelopmentHello, Zmalluzboyz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ministry of Liturgical Development". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! S0091 (talk) 22:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Ministry of Liturgical Resource DevelopmentHello, Zmalluzboyz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ministry of Liturgical Resource Development". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for September 29Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mathews Severios, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paulose II. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC) Please try to use edit summaries as much as possible!Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 20:11, 4 November 2021 (UTC) ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message |