YvesMe, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi YvesMe! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).
|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roman Retzbach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Retzbach until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 16:29, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Thank you! I verified all data about the person Roman Retzbach" --YvesMe (talk) 16:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, YvesMe. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Roman Retzbach, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 16:30, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Thank you! I promise that I work indepandant and have no relation to the person Roman Retzbach" --YvesMe (talk) 16:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
YvesMe (talk) 17:51, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Please help me and give me a mentor to do it better! I was engaged of the World Future Society by Julie (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Friedman) to put the new board members as ambassadors to wiki (about 7-10 persons). So please I don't want to fight with you 10 times about cv. Help and support me please!!! If you want I put always the profiles to draft until you accept! Please tell me which mistakes I made! I got the data from Julie from World Future Society (WFS), which side I also should correct, and interviewed Roman if all data is o.k.! So what is wrong please! I like to stay in good contact with you all. I am student and want to get journalist later.[reply]
- If you were engaged by Julie Friedman of the World Future Society then you have a conflict of interest, which you need to declare on your user page. Theroadislong (talk) 17:55, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikipedia articles are created using what reliable ± independent sources have said about a subject, we have absolutely no interest in anything they want to say about themselves. Theroadislong (talk) 18:11, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ok, I will put my sponsor WFS out and work only as student further on this exam project. Thanks for your help as friendly support!
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Roman Retzbach. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:34, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Roman Retzbach. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —andrybak (talk) 09:57, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence User talk:Johnpacklambert. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 12:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I was only friendly asking for support as help, and we're living in a democratic world of free opinions. YvesMe (talk) 12:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you are writing as part of an educational project your teacher needs to read this Wikipedia:Education program/Educators. Student assignments should always be carried out using a course page set up by the instructor. It is usually best to develop articles on the students' user pages, or as drafts. After evaluation, the additions may go on to become a Wikipedia article or be published in an existing article. Theroadislong (talk) 07:12, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, so I will do so! So why we put not the RR article again to draft, after I saw it is not ready? I was working in a draft and wanted only to do a test. I put the article again to draft, but then it was put back. So why we can't agree I work again on the article and take time, and then I think it is ready, I inform you (all) before publishing again. I see and learned now how to work here and got my hard lection as tough training to accept your work and do it next time better. Please, Theroadislong!--YvesMe (talk) 08:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Once it is at WP:afd it can't be moved to draft except by an admin, I'm not seeing how you can make it notable though. Theroadislong (talk) 14:08, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Future.Institute replied that there are other publications in other languages, that are also available in different locations or countries and that went through external publishers, but it takes time to put this together and make it available to me. I let the whole thing rest for at least 6 months and discussed this with my professor so that my student project will only be evaluated towards the end of the year. Unfortunately I cannot do another biography because all other people have already been selected. Thank you for your understanding! YvesMe (talk) 14:47, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So put an index lock on the side so that the deletion problem is solved.YvesMe (talk) 14:47, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
