User talk:Ytpks896

Ytpks896, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Ytpks896! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:10, 11 April 2020 (UTC)


Welcome

Hello, Ytpks896, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Ytpks896, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Motorways of Pakistan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hub and Dadu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Swat Motorway

Add in Map of Motorway in Swat Motorway. From chakdara to Fatehpur.( Phase two of the expressway will extend another 79 kilometers to the north and terminate at Fatehpur. The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government allocated ₨70 billion (US$420 million) for the extension. [7]) Dr Mustajab (talk) 05:44, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a uploader of map, ask the map uploader. Ytpks896 (talk) 14:13, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Pakistani passport
added a link pointing to Identification
United States passport
added a link pointing to Identification

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Thanks for maintaining the integrity of the Wikipedia. Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk) 17:43, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for Kamala harris page added

Sources for proving kamala harris is Indian american has been added and they are very explicit, Now don't revert my edit again! I am pending changes reviewer user I have the rights to decide the final review in edits and change it, you have been notified! Swtadi143 (talk) 11:09, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know you have pending changes rights but it doesn't mean you should not provide references or discuss on talk page before changing anything. Ytpks896 (talk) 11:41, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please update your 2020 Gilgit-Baltistan Constituency Winner map

2020 Gilgit-Baltistan Assembly elections result

@Ytpks896:

Hello! You've created a very nice map on the winners of each constituency of Gilgit-Baltistan, but I must tell you that it is slightly out of date now.

At the moment the PTI candidate actually has won GBLA-2 (Gilgit-II) by a total of two votes over the PPP candidate. This is the only issue with your map at the moment. -- Abbasi786786 (talk) 14:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of intelligence agencies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Intelligence Service.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Okara District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union Council.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Ytpks896, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Empire AS Talk! 17:16, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited PayPak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Service.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Srijanx22 (talk) 21:03, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Srijanx22 (talk) 01:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First of all you are not explaining your edits in summary, you are changing information on your based views, Mehrgarh is the oldest civilization in South Asia which is mentioned in references but you are continuously changing it to Balochistan and adding terrorism in challenges section without any source or reference & you are blaming me for disruptive edits. Ytpks896 (talk) 02:43, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why you are leaving dubious edit summaries? Mehrgarh is not mentioned as "oldest civilization" by the source. It only says "provided the earliest known undisputed evidence for farming and pastoral communities in the region".[1] You are misunderstanding it as "oldest civilization in South Asia" because there are many more sites older than Mehrgarh in South Asia. Mehrgarh exists in Balochistan. It is a no-brainer that Terrorism in Pakistan is a very big issue in Pakistan as confirmed by recent reliable sources.[2] I haven't touched any 'challenges' section' but the mention of terrorism existed in the earlier version until it was removed without a good reason.[3]
What you are doing is indeed disruptive editing. Any further edit warring will be reported. Srijanx22 (talk) 04:36, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First i'm not leaving dubious summaries and here is clearly mentioned Mehrgarh#History is the oldest civilization in South Asia. Second you are adding "Terrorism in Pakistan" with unNeutral indian references, which is against Wikipedia POV, If you continues doing this I will go to Administrators' noticeboard and this matter will be solved there. Ytpks896 (talk) 06:51, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So first you misrepresented the source and now you are doubling down by wikilinking to Mehrgarh#History which also say "is one of the earliest known sites which show evidence of farming and herding in South Asia" than call it outright oldest civilization. Statements by European Foundation for South Asian Studies (EFSAS) cannot be dismissed as "Indian references". Do you have evidence that Yahoo news misrepresented them? You are welcome to take this to WP:ANI given your lack of acknowledgement of your disruptive editing is clearly concerning. Srijanx22 (talk) 10:11, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not misrepresented the source. Read [note 1] and adding about Terrorism in article and giving the reference of Yahoo they published the story of ANI which is know as a propaganda tool of Indian government & In 2020 EU DisinfoLab exposed ANI for anti-Pakistan propaganda campaign.


  1. ^ Excavations at Bhirrana, Haryana, in India between 2006 and 2009, by archaeologist K. N. Dikshit, provided six artefacts, including "relatively advanced pottery," so-called Hakra ware, which were dated at a time bracket between 7380 and 6201 BCE.[1][2][3][4] These dates compete with Mehrgarh for being the oldest site for cultural remains in the area.[5]

    Yet, Dikshit and Mani clarify that this time-bracket concerns only charcoal samples, which were radio-carbon dated at respectively 7570–7180 BCE (sample 2481) and 6689–6201 BCE (sample 2333).[6][7] Dikshit further writes that the earliest phase concerns 14 shallow dwelling-pits which "could accommodate about 3–4 people."[8] According to Dikshit, in the lowest level of these pits wheel-made Hakra Ware was found which was "not well finished,"[8] together with other wares.[9]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ytpks896 (talk • contribs)

Those sources contradict you. Just read them. The report from ANI can be confirmed through any other reliable sources,[4] and there are also others[5][6] who have same concern. You need strong evidence to prove terrorism as a non-issue but so far you have no rebuttal. Srijanx22 (talk) 17:07, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding maps

Since it is AGAINST indian law to show any Wrong Map of india[10], and also indian govt has officialy asked wikipedia to change this maps[11], this is necessary to change these maps. otherwise indian govt can OFFICIALY ban wikipedia in india. As we all know wikipedia is already ban in countries like China. and the largest userbase wikipedia has is of India, i dont think that wikipedia would like to loose its vast userbase. So this is my suggestion to you that wikipedia should not use wrong map of india. NOTE: I am not a indian citizen Talktotommy (talk) 04:41, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talktotommy - Please see Wikipedia's general disclaimer. It says that "Publication of information found in Wikipedia may be in violation of the laws of the country or jurisdiction from where you are viewing this information. The Wikipedia database is stored on servers in the United States of America, and is maintained in reference to the protections afforded under local and federal law. Laws in your country or jurisdiction may not protect or allow the same kinds of speech or distribution." ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:57, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:Oshwah - first of all i am not a indian citizen so this is not MY country. Secondly, i am a wellwisher of wikipedia. Wikipedia has its largest userbase in India not in Pakistan(the affected country by map edits), Indian government is very Strict regarding India's Maps. So if wikipedia doesn't comply to Indian laws, it can lead to Permanent ban on WIkipedia, which will lead to huge loses to wikipedia as it is already facing after China's ban. so i suggest not to Disobey Indian Laws, and comply with them to safeguard wikipedia from banning in india. and if we use correct maps of india only one country Pakistan will have issues, which has a very little userbase as compared to India. SO PLEASE SAVE WIKIPEDIATalktotommy (talk) 05:08, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Oshwah: They turned out to be a sockpuppet, which I'm sure surprised absolutely no one. ST47 (talk) 05:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ST47 - Oh wow, I'm actually kind of shocked here. Are you sure? j/k ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:15, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Military academies in Pakistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page School of Artillery.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Samaro, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 14:20, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of tehsils of Sindh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khanpur Tehsil.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

District officials

Hi, Police district commissioners and district health officers are NOT leaders of local administration; in addition, police districts are not same as administrative districts. So, please revert your additions of these two post titles to infoboxes. Thanks. — kashmīrī TALK 17:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kashmiri: I'm not agree with you, because district police officer & health officer are the head of their department service in whole district, if you have any reliable proof of your claim then show it. Ytpks896 (talk) 06:42, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not asking you to agree with me. I'm informing you that this parameter is NOT for storing the organigramme of the city administration or the police force. Please read the template documentation - the parameter is for the settlement's civilian leaders: city mayor, head of council, local MP, etc.
Besides, we don't add add "N/A" in infoboxes, as you have been doing for the last couple of days.
I suggest you remove all such edits. — kashmīrī TALK 12:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not storing the 'organogram of the city administration" these 3 posts are the governing bodies of the Pakistan's district government i don't think their is a ban on adding them in infobox many countries district articles contains District government body's posts in infobox for example see districts of india Bastar district, Sonbhadra district and Bangladesh Chittagong District Rajshahi District. Ytpks896 (talk) 13:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The “Ethnic Groups of Pakistan” needs to be updated. That page has outdated data.

I edited this page using the stats from the 2017 Pakistan Census but someone edited it back using the CIA Factbook (which is outdated).

The actual stats can also be found on the Pakistan Languages Wikipedia page.

Punjabis are 38.78% of the population not 44.7%. Pashtuns are 18.24% of the population not 15.2% Sindhis are 15.7% of the population not 15.2%. There are many more corrections needed too.

The CIA Factbook has used outdated data so please use the official 2017 Pakistan Census as a source. MT111222 (talk) 21:32, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The “Ethnic groups” of the Pakistan page needs to be updated

The actual stats can also be found on the Pakistan Languages Wikipedia page.

Punjabis are 38.78% of the population not 44.7%. Pashtuns are 18.24% of the population not 15.2% Sindhis are 15.7% of the population not 15.2%. There are many more corrections needed too.

The CIA Factbook has used outdated data so please use the official 2017 Pakistan Census as a source. MT111222 (talk) 21:36, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The “Ethnic groups” section of the Pakistan page needs to be updated using the latest data from the 2017 Pakistan Census.

The actual stats can also be found on the Pakistan Languages Wikipedia page.

Punjabis are 38.78% of the population not 44.7%. Pashtuns are 18.24% of the population not 15.2% Sindhis are 15.7% of the population not 15.2%. There are many more corrections needed too.

The CIA Factbook has used outdated data so please use the official 2017 Pakistan Census as a source. 

MT111222 (talk) 21:38, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mirpur Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mirpur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.WR 13:09, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Onel5969 TT me 13:20, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Noting that this block has been superseded by a CheckUser block -- TNT (talk • she/her) 00:45, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hello @EdJohnston: there is a dispute going between me and user:Weaveravel, i reverted his controversial edit on 24 February at Afghan name, He merged ethnic Pashtun name article with "Afghan name" without any discussion, which is totally against WP:POV & WP:Guidelines. Pashtun ethnic are native to both Pakistan and Afghanistan so it cannot be merged with Afghan name or Pakistani name article.

Now after 6 days he reported me at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and @NinjaRobotPirate: blocked me as a Suspected sockpuppet of User:ShahabKhanJadoon1, without any explanation or evidence, He not even allowed me to defend myself. Ytpks896 (talk) 17:16, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ytpks896 you can make an appeal of this block by using the template {{unblock}}. This will allow other administrators to review your request and the block, and then decide if an unblock should be made. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
-- TNT (talk • she/her) 00:44, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Punjabi Wikipedia (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Punjabi Wikipedia (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:53, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ytpks896

Thank you for creating List of ports in Pakistan.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Needs references and cites. I marked as reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:40, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karachi Province

Notice

The article Karachi Province has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NayaPay

Notice

The article NayaPay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources are all WP:ORGTRIV; subject fails WP:NCORP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Brahuistan Province" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Brahuistan Province has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 14 § Brahuistan Province until a consensus is reached. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:54, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ "Archeologists confirm Indian civilization is 2000 years older than previously believed, Jason Overdorf, Globalpost, 28 November 2012".
  2. ^ "Indus Valley 2,000 years older than thought". 2012-11-04.
  3. ^ "Archeologists confirm Indian civilization is 8000 years old, Jhimli Mukherjee Pandey, Times of India, 29 May 2016".
  4. ^ "History What their lives reveal". 2013-01-04.
  5. ^ "Haryana's Bhirrana oldest Harappan site, Rakhigarhi Asia's largest: ASI". The Times of India. 15 April 2015.
  6. ^ Dikshit 2013, p. 132, 131.
  7. ^ Mani 2008, p. 237.
  8. ^ a b Dikshit 2013, p. 129.
  9. ^ Dikshit 2013, p. 130.
  10. ^ "7-year jail, Rs 100 crore fine for wrong depiction of India map". TOI. Retrieved May 5, 2016.
  11. ^ "Govt orders Wikipedia to remove link showing incorrect map of India, says sources". The Hindu.