User talk:Srijanx22

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 20:53, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB rating

Hi there, re: this edit, as an FYI, the community isn't interested in IMDb user ratings. They can be manipulated and don't necessarily reflect reality. See MOS:FILM#Audience response. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:46, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Information icon Hello, I'm Fylindfotberserk. I noticed that you recently removed content from Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

You are Welcome

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:03, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You sir, for my new pet. Srijanx22 (talk) 17:36, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha.. Regards. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:38, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

😃😊 Srijanx22 (talk) 21:56, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hi, I would like to know the reason for this unexplained edit. Dheerajmpai23 (talk) 20:56, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kurukshetra War, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chedi and Bahlika (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:18, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Kurukshetra War. Doug Weller talk 14:03, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Plz could you explain my mistake cuz as far as I know I didn't remove any template.I remove an unnecessary qoute and it's related citation. So it would be better to specifically tell me what is wrong with my edit. Srijanx22 (talk) 07:09, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SUN EYE 1 11:59, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Violence against Christians in India, you may be blocked from editing. SUN EYE 1 12:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism in Billy West

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Billy West.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wars of the Diadochi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antigenes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Information icon Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Maratha invasions of Bengal. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 15:40, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@RegentsPark: I assume this is a misunderstanding. Have you looked into blatant misrepresentation of sources, edit warring, failure to BRD by other editor? Am I not even allowed to start a talk page discussion for his month long continued disruption? Srijanx22 (talk) 15:50, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Srijanx22. Alleging that someone is editing with a POV (as you repeatedly do here) is indicative that you are not assuming good faith. Stick to sources and dispassionate discussion and you won't have any problems. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:55, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't know that but I agree now. But then, even he is throwing "POV" charge onto others when he said that there are those who were "trying to push the Maratha POV".[1] Maybe you can warn him similarly? Srijanx22 (talk) 15:59, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
True. But they are not pointing at any specific user so it is merely a general statement and that's not the same thing. --RegentsPark (comment) 16:10, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peace

Aditya(talk • contribs) has invited you to smoke a peace pipe together! Smoking peace pipes promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by offering someone else a peace pipe, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend who just likes to smoke.

Spread the peace by adding {{subst:Peace pipe}} to someone's talk page! You can use a parameter to insert the name of the recipient and add your own text to the message with a second. Smoking this wiki-peace pipe does not affect your health.

We met at a bitter dispute spread over one talk, a handful of user talks and a couple of ANIs, not the best places to meet fellow editors. I regret my loss of cool, which I hope haven't damaged the possibility of you and I collaborating in future, on something. After all we are often interested in similar articles, and we all want to improve them to the best of our abilities. Maybe sometime we could have a beer together, or TeacupY tea. It's better than beer, you know. Apologising again for all the badblood. Peace. Aditya(talk • contribs) 02:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here comes the sun...

I think we have a consensus. Since you were one of the diriving forces of the discussion... would you do the honors of making the consensus edit? Anyone protests and I stand by you.

By the way, what TeacupY virtual tea would you prefer? I guess it's time to pour another cup to celebrate a successful discussion. Aditya(talk • contribs) 01:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Aditya, I am glad we all were able to reach to a consensus through healthy discussions. I appreciate the honors of making the consensus edit, however I agree with the arguments made by @Peacemaker67 in [2]. We should have a final vote regarding this and close this matter of contention once and for all.😊 Srijanx22 (talk) 07:28, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

...and some jalebi

Here's a box of jalebi to go with baklava (though baklavas are the best). It was indeed sweet after so much deliberation. 😊 Aditya(talk • contribs) 08:38, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Diabetes alert 😬😬 Srijanx22 (talk) 10:31, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) . - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pragya Singh Thakur

Hi, I've restored to the version before your edit since substantial maintenance, archiving and cleanup has been done since the November 2019 version. Kindly do it manually instead of full revert to the old version. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:52, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electoral College (India), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jammu and Kashmir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

B. R. Ambedkar

In the B. R. Ambedkar article, you have been continuously deleting edits of many users without giving a proper reason and without consensus. "Puffery and flattering language" is not an acceptable reason. Removing wiki page links, spelling corrections, references / sources, content, categories, external links, templates, statues information, other correct information, etc., are not all "puffery and flattery languages". But, you have consistently deleted a large text. No text should be removed without the consensus of the wiki community. So do not delete it again. भारतभूषण प्रकाश नरंदेकर (talk) 18:26, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Information icon Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. JRDkg (talk) 14:05, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of governors of Bengal Presidency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengal Province.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

minor

Pleae read wp:minor.Slatersteven (talk) 11:32, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About allegations u made

What wrong i have done?? Shraman1218 (talk) 22:57, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Western Command (India)
added links pointing to Corps of Engineers and 100th Regiment of Foot
Northern Command (India)
added a link pointing to 100th Regiment of Foot

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Modi rallies

This has clearly become a notable storyline of the second wave. In fact, I think the article has been too positive and needs to include more criticism of the response in order to satisfy neutral point of view. ViperSnake151  Talk  04:17, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FDW777 (talk) 12:20, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see you received one above, but as it was over twelve months ago a new one is necessary for awareness. FDW777 (talk) 12:21, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement

See Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. FDW777 (talk) 10:40, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Query regarding off-wiki coördination

Hi, Srijanx22. Please see the question I've posed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aman.kumar.goel. You can respond in section "Comments by other users". Thanks. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 02:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Southwest Airlines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 17:11, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) The added material is verified in the body of the article, which is all that's required under WP:LEDECITE. I've restored Srijanx' edit. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 17:19, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Sapedder (talk) 05:30, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sapedder (talk) 03:47, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

I just noticed that it is over 12 months since you got a IPA alert so here it is:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Gusfriend (talk) 04:11, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Sourced Information

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Khalistan Movement, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Shubhdeep Sandhu (talk) 07:45, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

MBlaze Lightning (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

MBlaze Lightning (talk) 09:24, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hey, in the "Order" column of the Fleet table in airline articles are only unfulfilled orders stated, not the amount of aircraft ever ordered. Please take care about that. WikiPate (talk) 17:36, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did knew about it. I guess I wrongly assumed that the "order" section in Airbus "orders and delivery" sheet is a dynamic number hence unfulfilled order Srijanx22 (talk) 17:59, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Copyright problem icon Your edit to List of Ramsar sites in India has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 19:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pakistan. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:40, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well done

well done You can ignore Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry/Notes for the accuser; Wikipedia stopped doing it that way in 2018.-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Give the Reason like other sincere Wikipedian did

you revert the whole my efforts on what i did in Bhim Jayanti Wikipedia page.

first thing, i removed all the marathi citations and instead of this , i placed very reputable english languages citations like Hindu, the indian express, economic times articles which is required there.

but instead of discussing what point i did mistake, you just revert all my efforts by just calling it not need improvement. how do you reach to that concensus without discussion? that's not the way Wikipedia should work.

reverting need clear cut explanation or talk . i provide all the citations that is written. not a single line is going out of context.

so give you valuable reasoning for any kinda editing. Don't go for editing war head to head. discussion should be only option.

Much Regards. Callmehelper (talk) 12:04, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion at Talk:B. R. Ambedkar is very clear that you are pushing your edits on a similar article even after you failed to get them done on the main article. Better resolve your differences on the main article. Srijanx22 (talk) 14:32, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]