User talk:Wisdomwiki 40Welcome!Hi Wisdomwiki 40! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics. If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Happy editing! JarrahTree 14:27, 8 October 2020 (UTC) Your attention means a lot to learners like me, and brings more responsibility. I will use the resources you shared to seek assistance whenever I'm stuck with something. Thank you JarrahTree Wisdomwiki 40 (talk) 14:43, 8 October 2020 (UTC) addwhen updating and changing things like you do - try very hard to have WP:RS the source is very important - otherwise there is a quite problematic issue of WP:SPAM and WP:OR - take it easy !! JarrahTree 14:48, 8 October 2020 (UTC) Nomination of Excitel for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Excitel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Excitel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Coriannakox (talk) 08:39, 17 October 2020 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Madaria (disambiguation)
A tag has been placed on Madaria (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Captain Calm (talk) 11:29, 3 November 2020 (UTC) Captain Calm I created this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madaria_(disambiguation). Actually, there is one more place with the same name for which I want to create a page. November 2020Hello Wisdomwiki 40. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Wisdomwiki 40. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: Nomination of Cheman Shaik for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cheman Shaik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheman Shaik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RationalPuff (talk) 17:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC) replywelcoming a new editor does not automatically follow to actually mean that I advocate or support a new editor or their work - and as I read the Afd - I think you should read the responses very closely - and understand what is going on. Take care JarrahTree 05:44, 27 February 2021 (UTC) JarrahTree, do not misinterpret my approach. Just I wanted an unbiased review, nothing else! Spare a few minutes if possible to review my responses, particularly the yesterday's one. Do not advocate or support me. I believe, right guidance is more important than a vote, that's it.Wisdomwiki 40 (talk) 06:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC) Please read their comments, rather than ask me for my opinion - they are offering you guidelines and frameworks to understand. Please, take the time to read what they have offered you. JarrahTree 06:15, 27 February 2021 (UTC) I've been doing so. Thanks.Wisdomwiki 40 (talk) 06:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC) March 2021Hello Wisdomwiki 40. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Cheman Shaik, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Wisdomwiki 40. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: Saurabh Dwivedi moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, Saurabh Dwivedi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " Anusha Rai moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, Anusha Rai, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " Women in RedHi there, Wisdomwiki 40, and welcome to Women in Red. I'm happy to hear you intend to create more articles about women. In this connection, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:13, 8 March 2021 (UTC) March 2021 at Women in Red
--Ipigott (talk) 10:13, 8 March 2021 (UTC) Puja Bahri moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, Puja Bahri, is not suitable as written to remain published, as you have not demonstrated that the subject meets the General Notability Guideline. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " AfC notification: Draft:Ashutosh Sharma has a new comment
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ashutosh Sharma. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:46, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
April editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging Your submission at Articles for creation: Puja Bahri (April 23) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kashmorwiki was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging Your submission at Articles for creation: Saurabh Dwivedi (April 29) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Optiontown (May 12) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nomadicghumakkad were:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
June 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging AfC notification: Draft:Ashutosh Sharma has a new comment
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ashutosh Sharma. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:18, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
July 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging Your submission at Articles for creation: Anusha Rai (July 13) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashutosh Sharma (biotechnologist) (July 18) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qwerfjkl were:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Cheman Shaik has been accepted Cheman Shaik, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .Thanks again, and happy editing! ―Qwerfjkltalk 18:51, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of Cheman Shaik
A tag has been placed on Cheman Shaik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheman Shaik. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 TT me 14:34, 21 July 2021 (UTC) August Editathons with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging September 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging Nomination of Anusha Rai for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anusha Rai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anusha Rai (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creepTalk 19:08, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:Puja BahriHello, Wisdomwiki 40. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Puja Bahri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC) October 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:38, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging Concern regarding Draft:Saurabh DwivediHello, Wisdomwiki 40. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saurabh Dwivedi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:OptiontownHello, Wisdomwiki 40. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Optiontown, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 12 October 2021 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Puja BahriHello, Wisdomwiki 40. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Puja Bahri". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:46, 23 October 2021 (UTC) November 2021 at Women in Red
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:33, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging December 2021 at Women in Red
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging January 2022 Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:04, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashutosh Sharma (biotechnologist) (January 1) Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not meet WP:BASIC / WP:AUTHOR
K.e.coffman (talk) 18:07, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging March editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Your submission at Articles for creation: Puja Bahri (March 4) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hoary were:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
April Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Your draft article, Draft:Saurabh DwivediHello, Wisdomwiki 40. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saurabh Dwivedi". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:19, 5 April 2022 (UTC) May 2022 at Women in Red
--Innisfree987 (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging May 2022 at Women in Red
--Innisfree987 (talk) 10:07, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajiv Kumar (May 4) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajiv Kumar (May 8) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
June events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Concern regarding Draft:Ashutosh Sharma (biotechnologist)Hello, Wisdomwiki 40. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ashutosh Sharma (biotechnologist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:39, 8 June 2022 (UTC) Women in Red in July 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Your draft article, Draft:Ashutosh Sharma (biotechnologist)Hello, Wisdomwiki 40. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ashutosh Sharma". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:45, 1 July 2022 (UTC) Women in Red August 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red in September 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red October 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red November 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Concern regarding Draft:Rajiv KumarHello, Wisdomwiki 40. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rajiv Kumar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:28, 30 October 2022 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Rajiv KumarHello, Wisdomwiki 40. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rajiv Kumar". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 09:39, 8 November 2022 (UTC) Women in Red in December 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red January 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:17, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging September 2023 at Women in Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red January 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red August 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red August 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging September 2024 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red October 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Ashutosh Sharma (Botanist) (October 21) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Women in Red November 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:46, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red December 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 18:47, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red January 2025
--Lajmmoore (talk 17:52, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging |