User talk:Warrenjs1

Your submission at Articles for creation

Firemen and Deckhands' Union of New South Wales, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

~ Matthewrbowker ^Say hi! 15:16, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Firemen and Deckhands' Union of New South Wales

On 15 March 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Firemen and Deckhands' Union of New South Wales, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Firemen and Deckhands' Union of New South Wales sent a delegate to the first legal meeting of the African National Congress in 1991? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:04, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization

Hi. Thanks for helping out with the trade union articles. --Soman (talk) 05:38, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Greetings Warrenjs1, I just wanted to let you know that I took a look at your recently created article Federated Millers and Manufacturing Grocers Union--The citations and references seem to abide to Wikipedia's referencing guidelines. It would be great if you could also improve the related article Sarre-Union.

I'm kind of new here myself but let me know if there is any way I can help. Thanks, Jipinghe (talk) 23:54, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Organisations established in 1901

Hi, I have nominated Category:Organisations established in 1901 and Organisations established in 1901, both of which you created, for deletion. You may have intended to go further with that scheme, but as isolated pages rather than part of a set they do not appear to serve much purpose. – Fayenatic (talk) 19:13, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

union cat

hello, I suggested a rename of the former unions cat at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_April_4#Category:Former_trade_unions. --Soman (talk) 07:17, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Amalgamated Association of Operative Cotton Spinners

Nice work. I have modded the Lancashire cotton template to include Associations-- Clem Rutter (talk) 10:44, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Printing and Kindred Industries Union

Hi, I'm Shrikarsan. Warrenjs1, thanks for creating Printing and Kindred Industries Union!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Try to add citations

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Shrikarsan (talk) 17:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unions

Thank you so much for your articles on past trade unions - this is a real blackspot on Wikipedia and you're doing a great job. I have to say though - you're teetering precariously on copyright violations by taking text directly from the Australian Trade Union Archives. I know it's difficult when you're summarising text that's already very short, but it would be great if you could put it in your own words lest someone more difficult try to delete it in future. The Drover's Wife (talk) 05:51, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great to hear. It's so good to see these getting created - I keep wanting to do the same myself, but I get so confused at the tangle of state and federal unions that I always wind up giving up! The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:24, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to add my appreciation of your work here too. I have always been frustrated by our almost total lack of coverage on former trade unions (even quite significant ones), especially when writing biographies of Labor politicians. It's really great to see someone tackling this problem! Frickeg (talk) 09:36, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Ferguson Left

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ferguson Left, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. -- Aronzak (talk) 11:22, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America

Thank you for creating Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America. I had it on my wishlist for quite some time and I just noticed that you created it. Great work and thank you!--TM 12:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BWIU

By the way - if you've got anything to add to the trade union articles I've been creating it'd be much appreciated. Your articles are always fantastic and you've got a bit more information/context at your disposal than I do. The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:01, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you get your hands on that Huntley book? It seems like it's an extremely useful source and I've never come across a copy. The Drover's Wife (talk) 10:19, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've got a copy I bought from Gould's Bookshop in Newtown, Sydney (a great resource for labour history), but I'd say most university/state libraries would have a copy. BTW, thanks for your work on the BWIU and PPWF pages - unions in the CFMEU lineage have been badly lacking up til now.Warrenjs1 (talk) 10:32, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ta! Looks like I'm headed for another day in the State Library - it's a shame I can't even find a copy to buy online because it'd be worth the investment. The Drover's Wife (talk) 10:41, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've created a short article at Australian Coal and Shale Employees' Federation to fill another one of these big gaps - any chance you could take a look at it? The Drover's Wife (talk) 04:36, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moulders

You've done a fantastic job with this - it's so good to see such good quality work on an Australian union article (and on one I'm more interested in, to boot - grandad was an official). It seems like it'd be at least C-class now, and well on the way to GA status. The only gap that stands out is post-1950, but I'm not sure what's out there. The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

reply

Unions in Australia are a very under-worked area - I would recommend from my side of things is simply the improvement of addition of reliable sources from good sources, and adequate images of things to do with the history of the union you are working on - improving the content and the presentation with encouragement is always worth following up - to get to higher status, I would warn the know nuthinks who review GA and so on leave me totally disinterested in the process. I personally would prefer to create more related articles, as the union history coverage is very poor in the Australian project. I am very opinionated on this subject, and would prefer to refrain from further elaborations at this point. JarrahTree 03:16, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:International Brotherhood of Boilermakers logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:International Brotherhood of Boilermakers logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:35, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Slums of Sydney, 1947.jpg

The file File:Slums of Sydney, 1947.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Federated Moulders' (Metals) Union of Australia

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Federated Moulders' (Metals) Union of Australia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Goldsztajn -- Goldsztajn (talk) 05:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I've completed the review, thanks for the work on this, there's a few little things and it will be GTG.--Goldsztajn (talk) 03:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Federated Moulders' (Metals) Union of Australia

The article Federated Moulders' (Metals) Union of Australia you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Federated Moulders' (Metals) Union of Australia for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Goldsztajn -- Goldsztajn (talk) 04:01, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JSTOR access

Hi - I noticed you mentioned you don't have access to an article (Saunders on Australian unions and the anti-Vietnam war movements) I referenced in the review of the Moulders. The article was cited via JSTOR; every wikipedia editor can get access to JSTOR. Personally, I find it a fantastic resource. Sign up here: Wikipedia:JSTOR. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 03:37, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Federated Moulders' (Metals) Union of Australia

The article Federated Moulders' (Metals) Union of Australia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Federated Moulders' (Metals) Union of Australia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Goldsztajn -- Goldsztajn (talk) 01:01, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Organized labour project

Thank you for earlier joining the Organized Labour project. I've been a participant in the project since 2006 and am helping with a revival of it. As part this we are introducing a new membership system, which will help with communications among participants. This involves creating a membership file for each participant within your user space (you can see an example of my membership card here: User:Goldsztajn/WikiProjectCards/WikiProject Organized Labour). This system is already in operation within a number of wikiprojects (such as Women in Red and Medicine). You will not have to do anything, myself or someone else from the project will create the relevant file within your userspace. However, I am conscious that it is not polite to change an editor's userspace without notice. If I don't hear from you in the negative, I will go ahead with making the change after the 18th of January. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Many thanks for supporting the project, in solidarity, --Goldsztajn (talk) 13:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your efforts on the wikiproject, it is sorely in need of reinvigoration. Please feel free to edit my userspace as necessary. Warrenjs1 (talk) 06:23, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Took me far longer than I had planned to get to this, but back underway, hoping to get the revival back on track for the northern autumn, southern spring. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 04:20, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Patternmaker (engineering) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Patternmaker (engineering), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 11:32, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:International Longshoremen's Association logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:International Longshoremen's Association logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Patternmaker (engineering)

Hello, Warrenjs1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Patternmaker (engineering), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:40, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Telecommunications Employees' Association

Thank you for your quick and phenomenal rewrite of Australian Telecommunications Employees' Association! I wanted to get at least something down but couldn't find much on hand easily, and you've managed to expand it many times over with a bunch of sources. Your work on Australian trade unions has always been invaluable, for what it's worth. The Drover's Wife (talk) 07:26, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for your kind comments. Australian trade union history is a sadly neglected field on Wikipedia, so it's great to have another person working at it - thanks for your contribution. Still much more to be done! Warrenjs1 (talk) 08:15, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I was part-way putting something short together and then stumbled on that massive source covering the exact topic and then spent the whole day reading it through. Lucky find. The Drover's Wife (talk) 12:18, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Australian Telecommunications Employees' Association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wakefield Press. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Public Service Board

I was wondering if you might be able to whip up a quick stub for that by any chance? I don't the redirect serves it very well, given that the APSC was a replacement for, not a continuation of, the APSB, with a reduced remit. It's another one of these cases that we've been addressing in existing trade union articles, where amalgamating historical bodies into the article on the current one either a) creates an incoherent mash of history, or b) kinda treats history as if it started somewhere between 1987 and 1992. The Drover's Wife (talk) 04:50, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I'll try to address it at some point soon. Cheers, Warrenjs1 (talk) 05:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ta! I was digging around for something easy to put together but was having limited luck and figured you'd be more likely to have better sources on hand. The Drover's Wife (talk) 05:11, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:United Mine Workers of America logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:United Mine Workers of America logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Huntley

Random question, but I don't suppose you've got any sort of digital copy of the Huntley book?

I sat in the State Library a couple of years ago and photographed a bunch of pages for future reference because it's such a difficult book to buy, but for some reason I took an extremely random selection of unions, and I've now worked through all the federal unions I had bar one (why I grabbed a bunch of NSW state unions I have no idea). I was hoping to go to the State Library and finish the job, but this lockdown has wrecked that idea. The Drover's Wife (talk) 12:03, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Unfortunately not, I only have an old copy I bought from Gould's Book Arcade in Newtown (Sydney), which is now starting to fall apart. Warrenjs1 (talk) 00:28, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brendan Hansen Politician.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brendan Hansen Politician.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees Union logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees Union logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sailors' Union of the Pacific logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sailors' Union of the Pacific logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marine Firemen's Union logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marine Firemen's Union logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]