User talk:UrashimataroPhotosHello again; you mentioned a little while ago that you had lots of photos of Kamakura; I'm gradually trying to list (hopefully as a prelude to more substantial enumeration) the various cultural properties, starting with those of national significance, but below the NTs/Specials; I've got as far as Kamakura-period ICP structures and the Historic Sites of Kanagawa (not too many red links with this one), and there are a few entries where I'm not spotting any images at Commons or on Japanese Wikipedia; if and when you have time and of course only if you're interested, I don't suppose you happen to have images of any of these: [1], [2] (= [3]?), [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]; quite a long list (and there may be more at some point, when I get further forward in time and down to the prefectural/municipal designations...) Of course no worry at all if you don't; otherwise trust all's well, sorry to bother you, and thanks, Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 00:38, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, and sorry for my prolonged absence. Believe it or not, I have every intention of coming back as soon as I can. The photos:
- Frank (Urashima Tarō) (talk) 01:09, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:
It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve. At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange). Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot. If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi t | c 17:36, 11 July 2012 (UTC) Okuden, chudenHello! Do you happen to know what an Okuden (奥殿) is? JAANUS is a bit mysterious about it, see [12] and [13]. It turned up in the newly designated NT, Kangi-in (歓喜院), Shōden Hall (聖天堂 shōden-dō), see for instance [[14]]. I believe Chuuden (中殿) is the same as Ai-no-ma, right? bamse (talk) 23:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC) SourcesHi! Just wanted to let you know, that I recently added two books to my library: (i) The Art and Architecture of Japan by Robert Treat Paine and (ii) Japan - A Short Cultural History by George Bailey Sansom. Haven't had time to read all of it yet, but if you want me to look up something please let me know (in case you don't have these books already). bamse (talk) 23:08, 5 September 2012 (UTC) Thank you Very much!Hello I'm sakisakisaki from japan. Thank you Very much! to made a Shinto's new section of Shinbutsu shūgō and the jingūji and Shinbutsu bunri
- After seeing your changes I realized that section was missing and necessary. If you have other ideas, let me know: I care about religion in Japan -Frank (Urashima Tarō) (talk) 03:06, 23 September 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for September 25Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Egara Tenjin Shrine, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tenjin and Haiden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 25 September 2012 (UTC) Thank youThank you for your words here. Your gesture is appreciated. --Ansei (talk) 17:43, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Kibitsu shrinesPlease take a look at these related articles: Perhaps you can help mitigate some of the confusion which is highlighted here. --Ansei (talk) 18:36, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Your merge proposalI closed the discussion that you initiated in June 2011 at Talk:Unangan#Merger proposal as merge, so feel free to perform the merge. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:32, 17 December 2012 (UTC) August 2013Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Torii may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:34, 11 August 2013 (UTC) Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library NewsletterBooks and Bytes
Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013 Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted. New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis?? New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 19:59, 27 October 2013 (UTC) The Wikipedia Library SurveyAs a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 14:51, 9 December 2013 (UTC) Hi, ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Hello, Urashimataro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Urashimataro. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Nomination of Moji (extension) for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moji (extension) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moji (extension) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Codename Lisa (talk) 19:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Urashimataro. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Your access to AWB may be temporarily removedHello Urashimataro! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 17:07, 15 August 2019 (UTC) |