User talk:TypoBoy

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Good luck, and have fun. FWIW, Bzuk (talk) 17:51, 30 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for your help with Spinoza

You're a good editor! Good catch on the grammar!--Tomwsulcer (talk) 18:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Great catches on Jimmy Wales, I appreciate it!  Skomorokh  07:35, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sporange

The term sporange is dated. It used to be used in the literature, but isn't used any longer. You can refer to the sporange entry on Wiktionary for supporting quotations. However, as the term is indeed dated, I certainly agree that it is not needed as an alternative word form in the sporangium article. --EncycloPetey (talk) 06:40, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
How can you have edited here for so long, yet have no barnstar? This is long overdue for all your diligent efforts! -- EncycloPetey (talk) 06:43, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Norway attacks

Great edits and great edit summaries, keep them coming. These were not minor edits though, please don't mark such edits as minor. Let me know if you need any help. --John (talk) 21:40, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words, and for the helpful link. I have read the minor-edits page, and I'll keep it in mind. TypoBoy (talk) 21:53, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dangling modifier

TB, nice catch on this fix! Thanks. --76.189.98.15 (talk) 02:05, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sechele I

Thanks for the fix. Quite right, but as for the dad that you mention in your edit summary...... you have left me wondering. Amandajm (talk) 07:08, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking of this Lonely Island song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAYL5H46QnQ . I suppose I should not assume that nobody ever reads the edit summaries! TypoBoy (talk) 11:47, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2013 Philadelphia Wiki-Picnic: Saturday, June 22

Philadelphia's Great American Wiknic at Penn Park
You are invited to the Philadelphia edition of the Great American Wiknic taking place in Penn Park, on Saturday, June 22, 2013! We would love to see you there!--User:Ocaasi (talk)|}}

June 2013

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on Talk:22nd and Market building collapse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  — 16:19, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Bill! I knew about signing posts, but often forget, so the reminder is helpful.
I understand. Though I have to say that you forgot again just here. ;-) —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  — 16:27, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
D'oh! TypoBoy (talk) 16:29, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KAL 007: I believe it was a (rare) correct use of comprise, and it is less wordy. Michaelmalak (talk) 19:14, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh look: Merriam-Webster agrees that yours is a valid meaning, and says objections to it (like mine) are wrong.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/comprise OK. TypoBoy (talk) 19:20, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GLAM Cafe invitation

Wikipedians are invited to the GLAM Café at the Chemical Heritage Foundation to meet, talk, and edit. We provide the space, the coffee, and the snacks: you provide ideas and enthusiasm! On the second Tuesday of each month, starting November 12, 2013. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 00:07, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
CHF small logo

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carrollcliffe (December 4)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:56, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Franklintown, Philadelphia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spring Garden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Franklintown, Philadelphia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HUD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Michael Foot may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • needed|date=August 2010}} <!-- as of 15 August 2010, following ref no longer lists him:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.humanism.org.uk/about/people/distinguished-supporters Distinguished
  • web|url=http://www.humanism.org.uk/about/people/distinguished-supporters Distinguished Supporters] British Humanist Association</ref> --> He was elected in 1988 a Fellow of the [[Royal Society of

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:31, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carrollcliffe concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carrollcliffe, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reliance

Thanks. Weakopedia (talk) 14:00, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Park Towne Place Apartment Homes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Edmund Bacon and Milton Schwartz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dilworth Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vincent Kling. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bernard Hopkins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phoenix. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:33, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Columbia Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington Senators. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward McHugh (artist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Louis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Carrollcliffe concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Carrollcliffe, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:02, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carrollcliffe has been accepted

Carrollcliffe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—Anne Delong (talk) 21:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

State name removals

Why are you removing state names from articles, as you did here? I see nothing in the cited guideline to support that. Gatoclass (talk) 07:28, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The linked guideline says, "This page describes conventions for determining the titles of Wikipedia articles on places and for the use of place names in Wikipedia articles. [ . . . ] Cities listed in the AP Stylebook as not requiring the state modifier in newspaper articles have their articles named City unless they are not the primary or only topic for that name. [ . . . ] The cities listed by the AP are Atlanta, Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Dallas, Denver, Detroit, Honolulu, Houston, Indianapolis, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, New Orleans, New York City, Oklahoma City, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Pittsburgh, St. Louis, Salt Lake City, San Antonio, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, and Washington, D.C.." TypoBoy (talk) 12:07, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If this were an Associated Press article about USS Advance, it would be required to say "she was decommissioned at Philadelphia", rather than "she was decommissioned at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania". Wikipedia:naming conventions (geographic names) tells Wikipedia contributors to do the same (though it is a guideline, so Wikipedia contributors, unlike AP writers, are not required to use that style). TypoBoy (talk) 12:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This blog post discusses the AP Stylebook's directions for naming cities. TypoBoy (talk) 12:36, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think you are labouring under a misapprehension here. The section in the guideline dealing with naming American cities is referring to the correct disambiguation method in article titles, not to preferred usage in main body text. Gatoclass (talk) 12:58, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
To me, it seems clear that that guideline covers both the names of articles and the use of place names in articles. (After all, the first sentence of the lead is, "This page describes conventions for determining the titles of Wikipedia articles on places and for the use of place names in Wikipedia articles.") But the language in the section about U.S. cities is indeed about article names.
I have created a new discussion about this at Wikipedia talk:naming conventions (geographic names)#U.S. city names in the text of articles. Let's talk about it there. Naturally, I'll wait for the outcome of that conversation before making any more edits like this. TypoBoy (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Gatoclass (talk) 03:58, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't let it shatter your sense of typo-self-worth...

...and I'm sure it will not: There's an errer, sort of a typographical one, in your excellent rewrite of the Displacement article. I don't remember the exact location, but the words "in fresh" are in there twice in a row at the end of a sentence a sentence. Other than that, it's perfect.  ;-) Lou Sander (talk) 02:11, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
thank you for not vandalism any articles TERRYWARDPittsburgh (talk) 17:58, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Encyclopedia of Recorded Sound page 789 partial view.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Encyclopedia of Recorded Sound page 789 partial view.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on an Article in Which You've Participated

A RfC on an article in which you've commend on has been opened here. This is a courtesy notification you may ignore if it is of no interest. LavaBaron (talk) 06:34, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Penn Center, Philadelphia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Comcast Center. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

The Barnstar of Good Humor
For this. I like funny Wikipedians. Please know that your humor is well appreciated! Regards, --Bananasoldier (talk) 18:07, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, TypoBoy. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's articles for improvement. Feel free to nominate an article for improvement at the project's Nominated articles page. Also feel free to contribute to !voting for new weekly selections at the project's talk page. If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of members. Bananasoldier (talk) 18:07, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you're interested. Bananasoldier (talk) 18:07, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Displacement

Thanks for your work on the "Displacement (ship)" page a year ago. The issues never got resolved back then, so I replaced the page with the version you created. Hopefully that's OK with you and everyone else. Akwdb (talk) 23:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Akwdb! It's certainly fine by me. TypoBoy (talk) 00:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Join us this Saturday (July 30) at the Philadelphia Wiknic

Join us this Saturday (July 30) at the Philadelphia Wiknic, the "picnic anyone can edit". This is an opportunity to meet other local Wikipedians, have fun, and discuss potential projects.

The event is this Saturday, between 1pm-5pm at the Picnic Grove in Penn Park.

(To unsubscribe from future messages, remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Philadelphia/Philadelphia meet-up invite list.)

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TypoBoy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dark side of the moon

Hi, because you have previously written about this subject in the past, could you please offer your views on the dispute on the article Moon, that is being discussed at Talk:Moon#Dark side of the moon, regarding the terminology of "dark side of the moon"? Thank you. —Lowellian (reply) 16:47, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TypoBoy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Buzludzha monument

Hello there:
You suggested splitting this page (some time ago!) so I've done the BOLD thing and split them. I don't know much about the subject, so if you have any other information to add to either of them, please go ahead. Regards, Moonraker12 (talk) 17:13, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TypoBoy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

System versus hydrological feature

Greetings, TypoBoy (talk · contribs). Thank you for goading me into refining the distinction between an organized entity - part of a system, including its mechanical infrastructure - and a hydrological feature.

Though their physical areas largely overlap, the Croton Watershed, the New York City water supply system's name for its southernmost watershed system and its infrastructure, including dams, spillways, tunnels, pumps, and other mechanical components, and the Croton River watershed, the physical drainage basin of some seven rivers that consolidate into the Croton River, they are quite distinct. That is why there are two separate articles - similarly named but distinct in capitalization and wording - for the two different entities.

The reality is that the inidenticalness of the NYC system's "Croton Watershed" and the natural feature "Croton River watershed" is even greater than that, due to an anomoly where two reservoirs within the latter actually collect and store water from it that is then distributed out of both it and the Croton Watershed (and into the delivery system of NYC's Delware Aqueduct, comprised almost entirely of water from four reservoirs collected on the opposite bank of the Hudson, the west, within the Delaware River and Catskill Mountain physical watersheds). Boyds Corner and West Branch Reservoirs are physically within the Croton River watershed but only ancillarily part of the Croton Watershed. Only water in excess of NYC's needs released by the West Branch's spillway ends back up in the Croton River watershed and Croton Watershed supply.

So, one is a complex entity, including physical structures such as dams, tunnels, and their supporting mechanicals, the other a natural feature. Their footprints largely overlap, but their drainages do not. Most unusual, that. Thus the two separate Wikipedia pages exist to help eliminate the confusion caused when both a Croton Watershed and Croton River watershed are conflated as one. Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 11:27, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Acetic acid bacteria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vector (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with Beaver Stadium

Although Beaver Stadium at max capcity plus the population of State College is larger then that of Allentown. Beaver Stadium is actually in College Township not State College, although it is in University Park. It's also not perminatt population so if it should be mentioned all angles should be shown. The population of State College already fluctuates so much throughout the year. It's even more complictaed when you realise that Beaver Stadium plus College Township < Allentown but State College plus Beaver Stadium is > Allentown and Happy Valley which is often interchangeable with State College would already be the fourth largest city in Pennsylvania. Anyways I'd like to know what you think with all that info in mind. Goontalk 19:21, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Goonsnick! Thanks for noticing my edit summary, and thanks for commenting on it here. As I think you know, I was kidding about adding Beaver Stadium to the List of cities and boroughs in Pennsylvania by population article, though I do think the factoid that only three Pennsylvania cities have a population larger than the capacity of Beaver Stadium says something about the state's paucity of large cities and the enormousness of the stadium, though I'm not sure exactly what it says. My experience is that people I've told it to (who are often Philadelphians, like ma) are mildly surprised to hear it, and also that they can easily name the two largest Pennsylvania cities but rarely the third, unless they just start naming all the ones they can think of.
I think it's interesting, though, that although the 106,572 members of a Beaver Stadium sellout crowd can be seen all at once, they nonetheless represent a significant proportion of the population of the state. The Beaver Stadium is therefore a convenient unit of population for discussing Pennsylvania demographics. The population of Pennsylvania is 120 1/8 Beaver Stadiums, of which 14.3 live in Philadelphia and 2.8 live in Pittsburgh. It's a handy visualization; perhaps we should use it in the infobox of Pennsylvania city pages.
OK, I'm kidding about that too. TypoBoy (talk) 14:16, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh my bad. I thought you were referring to editing the info for State College not adding Beaver Stadium. I only brought it up because the fact isn't technically true simply due to dumb borders. It's only cause I'm from the area that I know about it. I remember somebody from Pittsburgh once tried to say that State College was the third-largest city on game days.
Thank you for responding though! Goontalk 10:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. sorry for writing weirdly
I found your messages not at all weird, but rather clear, informative, and friendly. I'm glad to learn more about the overlapping place names of the Happy Valley area, both for its own sake and also as background to the bit of trivia I cited in my edit summary, that the capacity of Beaver Stadium is larger than the population of all but three Pennsylvania cities.
I'm glad to learn that people sometimes seriously claim that number should be included in the population of State College (which is wrong not only because, as you point out, the stadium does not lie within State College, but also because that would mean counting people both as stadium attendees and also as residents of wherever their domicile is [for many that being State College itself]). I'll be alert to that mistaken belief.
Thanks again for writing to me! TypoBoy (talk) 13:06, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Well-Earned Barnstar for Typoboy

The Minor Barnstar
In recognition of TypoBoy's untiring effort at excising unnecessary commas throughout the Wikipedia tumult. In having undertaken this Sisyphean task, a good job well done, TypoBoy has reflected the best qualities of an Editor that cares. (Note to TypoBoy, if there are any unnecessary commas in this proclamation, please feel free to edit appropriately.) Osomite (talk) 18:34, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martin Maloney (philanthropist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Logan Circle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oopsie! Fixed. TypoBoy (talk) 14:27, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect DAB edit

Thanks for the helpful (and respectful) comment on the edit on disambiguation page I edited incorrectly. I may have done that on some others (I'll go check) and correct them as well. Good to know! Cheers, Wclark (talk) 18:50, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad to hear this. I'm always annoyed (like, unreasonably pissed off) when my own edits are reverted, even if whoever did the reversion was right to do so, so I didn't want to be a jerk about it. Thanks for the kind note, and for your work on Wikipedia! TypoBoy (talk) 19:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates

Thanks for adding coordinates to Apennine Colossus. I altered them just now as they were overprecise. In terms of precision, I find that D°M′S″ (Degrees, Minutes, Seconds) works for most everything. In the case of a statue, either D°M′S.s″ or D.dddd° is pretty much guaranteed to hit the object. Any attempt at a finer gradation, and what hits in Google will miss in Bing Maps. So I always try to fit D°M′S″ first, then D.dddd°, then D°M′S.s″, then D.ddddd°. Abductive (reasoning) 15:16, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Typo

^Its^It's. ✌🏻 D2theque (talk) 03:42, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi D2theque! Thanks for the comment.
What are you referring to? TypoBoy (talk) 13:17, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I consider myself a very precise copy editor but have learnt some new details just by reviewing your edit history! (For example, I did not know that yakuza is a common noun.) Teacher1850 (talk) 22:13, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]