User talk:Lowellian

Lowellian's User Talk Page: Please leave new comments at the bottom of this page.

  • If you want me to respond quickly on some issue, it is best to post your responses on my Talk page, as I usually do not use my watchlist.

Please do...

  • ...notify me if an article I have edited is listed for deletion.

Please do not...

  • ...ask me about my personal life, which I keep separate from Wikipedia.

Thanks! —Lowellian

Proposed deletion of Marisol Padilla Sánchez

Notice

The article Marisol Padilla Sánchez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor with only minor credits. IMDB has been used as the only source for many years. No evidence of substantial sources available to help improve the article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:45, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marisol Padilla Sánchez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marisol Padilla Sánchez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marisol Padilla Sánchez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 15:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia:Monobook" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Monobook. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Monobook redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — J947 [cont] 06:24, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Sankoh" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sankoh. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 27#Sankoh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:57, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cimmeria (Conan)

Notice

The article Cimmeria (Conan) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:15, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cimmeria (Conan) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cimmeria (Conan) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cimmeria (Conan) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:52, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RFD of best president

See Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_August_3#Best_president, you created one of the redirects there. Hog Farm Bacon 05:09, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Desperate Wives" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Desperate Wives. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 19#Desperate Wives until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:33, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fundamental theorems

Notice

The article Fundamental theorems has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As per WP:INDISCRIMINATE: The only relationship between these theorems is their name. Also, the lead is WP:original synthesis, as trying to elaborate as a concept something that is not a concept.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. D.Lazard (talk) 06:46, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural depictions of the dog

Hello. You moved Cultural depictions of the dog → Cultural depictions of dogs. Thanks. But, please move the talk page too. Christian75 (talk) 11:44, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Christian75: Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Talk page was not automatically moved due to there being existing page history for the target. I've fixed it now, merging the page histories and restoring all comments for both talk pages. —Lowellian (reply) 18:13, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Jamie Spears

Hello, Lowellian, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Polyamorph, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Jamie Spears, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Spears.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Polyamorph}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Polyamorph (talk) 13:00, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Taiwanese drama for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taiwanese drama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taiwanese drama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

– DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 20:19, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infravision redirect nominated for discussion

Hi Lowellian,

I've nominated at Redirects for discussion page Infravision that you created, suggesting its deletion. It had been long ago turned into a redirect, but the target article no longer describes the concept, and I can't find a place at Wikipedia that discusses it.

I've tried restoring the original content before redirection, but it got reverted as being unsourced. Diego (talk) 17:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"JLin" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect JLin. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 13#JLin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 22:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:41, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking help editing an article

Hi @Lowellian:

I am a student who is new to Wikipedia. In one of my subjects, I am editing and updating the China-Pakistan Free Trade Agreement article. I saw that you are a member of Wikiproject: China and was wondering if you would be able to provide me with some feedback and help me improve it.

Any assistance would be greatly appreciated! :)

S2102sa (talk) 01:43, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Empire State University

Notice

The article Empire State University has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:25, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect compromise

Well it’s better than deleting I feel. Prepare for an AFD from this editor though. I too wanted it as kept though I get weary of contesting their Prods / AFDs. Jhenderson 777 14:20, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Jamie Spears" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Jamie Spears. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 27#Jamie Spears until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. CycloneYoris talk! 03:58, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Empire State University for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Empire State University is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empire State University until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:45, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"GUS" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect GUS. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 13#GUS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Merchandise giveaway nomination

A t-shirt!
A token of thanks
Hi Lowellian! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk ~~~~~
A snowflake!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

"Wikipedia:Anyone can edit" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:Anyone can edit and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 11#Anyone can edit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 15:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia:Monobook" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:Monobook and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 31#Wikipedia:Monobook until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 12:52, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

  1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
  2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Happy WikiBirthday!

𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 00:17, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Twenty Year Society

Dear Lowellian,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Twenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for twenty years or more. ​

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 14:40, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Anyone can edit"

You are the person who edited the main page of Wikipedia in November 2004 to say that Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that "anyone can edit".

I can see in other history that from 2001 the landing page at wikipedia.org said "You can edit this page right now!"

Are you the originator of the specific phrase, "encyclopedia that anyone can edit"? I know it is just a rephrasing of what people had been saying for years, but that wording has become popular. Do you remember making this edit? I am sure that many people had been discussing Wikipedia in various ways, but do you recall other people discussing the phrasing, or did you just do this spontaneously? Bluerasberry (talk) 16:33, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I am. Before that time, I had already been thinking [1] about how to improve the wording of various elements on the Main Page. My edit summary for the edit [2] that made the change was "intro should explain why wikipedia is special". Basically, I just asked myself, what makes Wikipedia special/unique among all the other encyclopedias out there that users should use this encyclopedia instead of other encyclopedias? And to me, ultimately, above all else, it was that anyone could edit it, so I felt that should be the first thing any visitor to the website sees. At that time, the Main Page had on it, "Visit our Community Portal to find out how you can edit any article," and I thought, we can make that turn of phrase shorter and simpler and move the emphasis from being able to edit any article to anyone being able to edit and to put that into the very first sentence, so that's what I did. —Lowellian (reply) 17:11, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for sharing that 2004 talk page message. I looked around also. I also think this is the origin of the phrase.
I tried to document it at q:special:permalink/3147057/3116026#2004
Do you find my documentation acceptable or have other thoughts on it? Bluerasberry (talk) 17:27, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the documentation that you're doing. I would remove the link to the 2004 talk page discussion, as it's actually not relevant, as it is discussing changing the wording of a different sentence on the Main Page rather than the actual "anyone can edit" sentence, which I added without mentioning on the talk page first (I only gave the talk page link above to note that I was thinking about other stuff on the Main Page around the same time). Also, minor WP:GNOME issue in that "user:Lowellian" should be capitalized as "User:Lowellian". —Lowellian (reply) 02:47, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Debut issue" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Debut issue and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 7#Debut issue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:46, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Hanging Man" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Hanging Man and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 9#Hanging Man until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. CycloneYoris talk! 08:53, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thurina

Notice

The article Thurina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence either of these women were ever known by this name

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★Trekker (talk) 21:20, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Velaric" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Velaric and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 18#Velaric until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:44, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Math Olympics" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Math Olympics and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 12 § Math Olympics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Randi Moth (talk) 15:44, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

"Skrullian Spymaster" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Skrullian Spymaster has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 13 § Skrullian Spymaster until a consensus is reached. Rtkat3 (talk) 15:53, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I had to correct the link to the discussion because it got relisted. I'm just letting you know that. --Rtkat3 (talk) 03:41, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion ended up relisted again. --Rtkat3 (talk) 02:02, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dark Beast for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dark Beast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Beast until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:43, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pacific Century for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pacific Century is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pacific Century until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:43, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for KevJumba

KevJumba has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:54, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"List of administrators" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect List of administrators has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § List of administrators until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:57, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Capashen" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Capashen has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 18 § Capashen until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Spider-Man (2018)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Spider-Man (2018) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 30 § Spider-Man (2018) until a consensus is reached. Indagate (talk) 08:19, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of D. C. Thomson (disambiguation)

Notice

The article D. C. Thomson (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page is not required: David Couper Thomson is linked in the lead of DC Thomson

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:33, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

An IT blessing for you!

May your "downtime" always be the relaxing kind.
:(
Lowellian device ran into a problem and needs to restart in a loop forever
Thank you for your insightful comment on the benefits of including CrowdStrike in the title.

Jruderman (talk) 16:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please Restore Ten Heavenly Stems Content

Unfortunately, Mr. Deletion did it again.

(Uhh… mamma mia!)

I’ve read his “explanations”/“justifications”.

Please restore that awesome chart and the other great material!

Thank you so much!

(Will heavenly peace return to the Ten Heavenly Stems page? Will it return for good? Time will tell…) 2607:FEA8:A9A1:6500:BC40:8C02:C16B:454B (talk) 23:58, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@User:2607:FEA8:A9A1:6500:BC40:8C02:C16B:454B: I can't do anything without consensus and further support from other users. The best thing you can do is to add your voice on Talk:Heavenly Stems and Talk:Earthly Branches and post an argument in support of restoration of that information and as to why his removals are unjustified. —Lowellian (reply) 00:18, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Preston Blair (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Preston Blair (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preston Blair (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 23:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Build order for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Build order is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Build order until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuantumFoam66 (talk) 22:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Primagen (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Primagen (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Undated

Template:Undated has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

"Ceddin Deden" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Ceddin Deden has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 25 § Ceddin Deden until a consensus is reached. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 contribs 11:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]