User talk:TrueMoriarty

Welcome!

Hello, TrueMoriarty! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 19:38, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, The Glebe, Barbados, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected to Saint George, Barbados. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 13:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from History of Chittagong into Chittagong Division. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
Furthermore, copying large amounts of text from article to article exhibits poor judgement with respect to writing better articles, by creating unnecessary content forks and failing to use summary style. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:11, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, List of Airports in Sylhet Division, Bangladesh, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 08:29, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello TrueMoriarty! The thread you created at the Teahouse, I want to add new column in a table, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:58, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi TrueMoriarty. Thank you for your work on Applewhaites Tenantry, Saint George, Barbados. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

ref isn't meant for this article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi TrueMoriarty. Thank you for your work on Ashbury, Saint George, Barbados. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

ref isn't meant for this article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:29, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi TrueMoriarty. Thank you for your work on Astoria, Saint George, Barbados. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

the ref is for a different article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:29, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi TrueMoriarty. Thank you for your work on Airy Hill, Saint George, Barbados. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

This is a part of Saint Joseph according to List of cities, towns and villages in Barbados

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:30, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Airy Hill, Saint George, Barbados moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Airy Hill, Saint George, Barbados. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:58, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

<big> in your signature.

Hi. Your post to the Teahouse today had a <big> in your signature which was erroneously closed by another <big> instead of by a </big>; i.e. not closed, and affected the rest of the page until I added the missing / . I'm not sure if this is part of your stored signature, or something you manually added for that post; but please make sure you correct it in future! ColinFine (talk) 15:18, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok TrueMoriarty (talk) 15:41, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello TrueMoriarty! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Reference, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 04:33, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ratneshwar Mukherjee moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ratneshwar Mukherjee. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:51, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced gastropod articles

Hello, I have noticed in the new pages feed that you have created four new stub articles relating to gastropods (Jujubinus alboranensis, Jujubinus browningleeae, Jujubinus eleonorae, and Jujubinus errinae) that are all unsourced. Before creating any more articles of this sort, would you mind taking a minute to add references to these articles? Many thanks. Waddles 🗩 🖉 16:18, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jujubinus alboranensis moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jujubinus alboranensis. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waddles 🗩 🖉 23:21, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jujubinus browningleeae moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jujubinus browningleeae. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waddles 🗩 🖉 23:22, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jujubinus eleonorae moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jujubinus eleonorae. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waddles 🗩 🖉 23:22, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing sections in your newly created articles

Thank you got creating articles about species, I find them interesting personally however I think it is better you slow down creating new articles and fix sections for previously created articles such as this, this and this. In the free space, Quality is preferred over quantity and it would save the stress of new page reviewers the stress of tagging your pages or drafting your articles every time. Tesleemah (talk) 07:24, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tesleemah,
I hope this message finds you well. My plan was to create all the missing articles about Jujubinus first, and then add the details and informations as I already added in Jujubinus browningleeae. Adding details in all the articles should not take more than a month for me
Regards,
TrueMoriarty (talk) 14:24, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Tesleemah; you shouldn't be creating below-quality articles in the main space and then looking to improve them over the course of a month. The standard expected is to improve them over the course of an hour. If you create multiple entries, the best place to do this is in userspace, perhaps in your sandbox; or, alternatively, use draft space then move them over. Klbrain (talk) 10:25, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sammy Thurman Brackenbury

Hi. Her defaultsort is:

  • {{DEFAULTSORT:Brackenbury, Sammy Thurman}}

She is referred to, throughout her article, by the surname "Brackenbury". Not "Thurman Brackenbury".

That is why I re-ordered her listing at Deaths in 2024, and why you need to change it back. Thanks. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 20:25, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've done it myself now. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 20:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jujubinus punctulatus moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jujubinus punctulatus. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Klbrain (talk) 10:03, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jujubinus quadrangulus moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jujubinus quadrangulus. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TNM101 (chat) 11:45, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As all the editors above have mentioned, I think you should slow down on creating these articles and go one at a time. TNM101 (chat) 11:48, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jujubinus articles

Information icon Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. If you are writing new articles, please do so in your user space or draft space until they are properly sourced and referenced and complete in themselves, and only then move them to mainspace. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 12:14, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok TrueMoriarty (talk) 13:58, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have now moved the articles in question to draftspace:
SunloungerFrog (talk) 16:31, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yekaterinburg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chkalovsky. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nemanthus californicus has been accepted

Nemanthus californicus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dcotos (talk) 07:09, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abegondo (Santaia) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Abegondo (Santaia). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 20:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Malacology barnstar
This is in recognition of your significant contributions to mollusk-related topics and articles, especially those on gastropods. Thank you for your dedication and diligence! Daniel Cavallari (talk) 22:47, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much!!!
TrueMoriarty (talk) 05:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vesía, Spain moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vesía, Spain. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs additional sources for verification. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Frost 14:06, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jujubinus punctulatus has been accepted

Jujubinus punctulatus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 06:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jujubinus quadrangulus has been accepted

Jujubinus quadrangulus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 07:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Information icon Hello, I'm Sumanuil. Thank you for your recent contributions to Cardeña. I noticed that you added an image to the article's infobox as a thumbnail. In future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox, as this is against the Manual of Style. When adding an image, supply only the filename to the |image= parameter and the caption to the |caption= parameter instead. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using; please consult the Template page for the infobox being used on that page for proper instructions and documentation. Thanks!  Sumanuil. (talk to me) 09:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok TrueMoriarty (talk) 09:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]