Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Asparagusus were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muduganti Jithender Reddy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Thesazh!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Asparagusus(interaction)13:30, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Asparagusus,
Thank you for reviewing my article draft for Muduganti Jithender Reddy. I appreciate your feedback and guidance.
I've carefully reviewed your comments and have made significant revisions to the article draft in line with Wikipedia's guidelines and standards. I've strived to maintain a neutral tone, avoid peacock terms, and provide relevant and reliable sources to establish the notability of the subject. The article now adheres to Wikipedia's encyclopedic format.
I kindly request you to review the revised draft once again and provide your guidance. I am committed to ensuring that the article meets all Wikipedia requirements. If there are any specific areas that still need improvement or if I've overlooked something, please let me know. Your guidance is invaluable as I work towards contributing to Wikipedia in a meaningful way.
Thank you for your prompt response and continued guidance. I sincerely appreciate your help in refining the article about Muduganti Jithender Reddy.
I have diligently addressed the issues you raised by reworking the content, removing any peacock terms, and providing a more neutral tone throughout the article. Additionally, I've included relevant images to enhance the visual aspect of the article and have cited sources where possible. I am fully committed to ensuring that the article adheres to Wikipedia's standards.
I kindly request you to review the revised draft once again to assess if the changes made align with Wikipedia's guidelines. If you find that the article now meets the required criteria, I would be grateful if you could consider approving and publishing it.
Thank you once again for your time, feedback, and support. I look forward to your response.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siddam Manohar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Siddam Manohar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Qcne(talk)16:30, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Thesazh. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
I believe that you used your camera to take the picture of the book his picture is in, but I don't believe that you took the image in the book. 331dot (talk) 12:31, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note that taking an image of a picture in a book would be no different than sitting in a movie theater recording a film being shown, and then selling copies claiming it is your film. If you took a picture of a picture, copyright still remains with the original photographer. 331dot (talk) 10:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot, I appreciate your guidance. Regarding the image of Mr. Reddy, it was initially captured by an unknown person and was sourced from a photo album. I uploaded it to this biography. Thesazh (talk) 10:56, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you shouldn't do that. The copyright belongs to the original photographer whether you can identify them or not, unless the photo is old enough to be in the public domain(doubtful as he does not seem old enough) 331dot (talk) 11:00, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot thanks for your guidance on this, It seems I misunderstood the Wikipedia terms regarding photo uploads, particularly in cases where the original photographer is not identifiable. I regret any oversight on my part, and I'm fully committed to rectifying this mistake. I will promptly remove the photo in question to ensure compliance with Wikipedia's copyright policies, If I have an option to remove the pic I'll remove it right away or else, please kindly remove for your end. Thesazh (talk) 11:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
December 2023
Hello Thesazh. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Thesazh. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Thesazh|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 17:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Let me clarify this for you, I want to clarify that I am assisting Chidipothu Manohar in compiling factual and neutral information for a potential Wikipedia page about his professional achievements. However, I am not receiving any form of compensation, financial or otherwise, for these edits. My aim is to ensure accuracy and adherence to Wikipedia guidelines regarding notable subjects. Thesazh (talk) 09:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I work in the Telugu film industry as an English subtitle provider for Telugu films. In the course of my work, I had the opportunity to meet Chidipothu Manohar, and we discussed the idea of creating a Wikipedia page for him to highlight his contributions to the industry.
@331dot Thank you for the guidance regarding the conflict of interest policies on Wikipedia. I understand the importance of transparency and adherence to these guidelines. To ensure compliance, I'll refrain from editing pages where I have a conflict of interest and strictly adhere to the guidelines moving forward.
Regarding the new page for Manohar, I'd like to confirm that I'll proceed with the creation in compliance with Wikipedia's policies. I will incorporate reliable, neutral sources and maintain a neutral point of view in line with the community standards. I aim to contribute valuable content while strictly adhering to the guidelines on conflict of interest. If there are specific formats or guidelines I should follow for the new page creation, I'm open to suggestions and guidance. These are the points I understood from WP:COI, kindly help me if I'm wrong
{{COI|employer=Sazh|client=Chidipothu Manohar|relationship=brother|talk=About Chidipothu Manohar's filmography and education}}
== Disclosure of Conflict of Interest ==
As a contributor on Wikipedia, I disclose that I have a potential conflict of interest when creating articles for individuals I am personally acquainted with or have a professional relationship with in the Telugu film industry. My intention is to contribute neutral, well-sourced content that adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies on notability, reliability, and neutrality. I commit to maintaining transparency and welcome guidance from the Wikipedia community to ensure compliance with Wikipedia's standards. I aim to follow Wikipedia's guidelines for conflict of interest and will refrain from promotional content or biased editing. Please feel free to reach out on my talk page for any clarification or concerns regarding my contributions.
This user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding the Wikipedia article Thesazh.
If you put the small user box on your user page, that will satisfy the need to disclose, thanks. The larger notice is meant for others to use on articles, so I have suppressed it here. 331dot (talk) 14:58, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Maliner were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siddam Manohar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DreamRimmer was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siddam Manohar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Thank you for the guidance provided. I've diligently searched for additional reliable sources and references regarding Chidipothu Manohar's career in the film industry. However, despite exhaustive efforts, I've encountered challenges in locating extensive, independent coverage that meets Wikipedia's standards.
I understand the importance of verifiable and substantial references. I'm committed to ensuring that any information shared regarding Manohar's career is supported by credible sources. I will continue my efforts to identify stronger references and will resubmit the draft as soon as I can gather sufficient and appropriate sourcing.
Thank you for your guidance and patience. Should you have any specific recommendations or further advice on finding suitable references, I'd greatly appreciate it. Thesazh (talk) 11:33, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Duvvuru Varshitha for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... I understand your concern about the promotional tone, and I'm committed to ensuring that the article aligns with Wikipedia's guidelines. I will carefully review and revise the content to address any promotional elements. Please grant me the opportunity to make the necessary adjustments, and I assure you that I'll adhere strictly to Wikipedia's standards for neutrality and encyclopedic content. If there are specific areas you find promotional, I would greatly appreciate your guidance so that I can make the corrections accordingly. Thank you for your understanding, and I look forward to your feedback. Thesazh (talk) 16:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grabup was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Not in-depth covarage from multiple independent reliable sources, also not yet released so no critical reviews. Wait for the release.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nindha (Film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grabup was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nindha (Film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, I'm Grabup. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Draft:Nindha (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. You are not allowed to delete past declines and comments left by Afc reviewers, If you continue to delete, you can be blocked from editing.GrabUp - Talk17:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nindha (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Hello, Thesazh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Muduganti Jithender Reddy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hi Thesazh. Thank you for your work on Currency Nagar. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Pailam Pilaga, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:10, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions to Pailam Pilaga. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and Apart from the promotional wording, the sources do not seem to be reliable. Get better sources before moving it to the main space..
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Thank you for your feedback on the Pailam Pilaga draft. I've rephrased the content to align with Wikipedia's guidelines and incorporated reliable sources to better establish the film's notability. I'm looking forward to seeing this draft move towards publication in the article space once reviewed. Thesazh (talk) 19:36, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions to Pailam Pilaga. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and please see Wikipedia:Notability (films). I would advise you to submit it for review instead of moving it back to the mainspace.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
All references here are covering routine announcements and press release reiterations that every other movie out there gets - song release, first look, poster, casting. Are there any reviews of the movie in reliable sources? As it stands, it doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pailam Pilaga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Thanks for your contributions to Dhakshina (film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Hello Thesazh, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Laggam (film), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laggam (film).
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I appreciate the opportunity to address the concerns regarding the Laggam (film) article.
I believe Laggam is notable due to its upcoming theatrical release, significant regional media coverage, and interest from the Telugu film audience. It has been covered by news outlets and has generated discussions on social media platforms, contributing to its cultural relevance.
Infact, I have added references to articles and interviews from reputable media outlets that discuss the film's release, its cast, and production. These sources should help establish the film's notability as per Wikipedia's guidelines.
@Bastun I am open to any further suggestions for improving the article and ensuring that it meets Wikipedia's standards for notability and verifiability. Thesazh (talk) 15:23, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Thesazh. WP:NFF states that unreleased films should not have articles. If you'd prefer, I can move the article to draft space until it's officially released, at which point it can be moved back to article space? You can continue to work on it while it's in draft space. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!15:32, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your suggestion and for clarifying the policy. I understand the WP:NFF guidelines regarding unreleased films. Moving the article to the draft space sounds like a reasonable solution. I would appreciate it if you could proceed with that.
This would give me the opportunity to continue improving the article with more details and sources as they become available, and then I can move it back to the article space once the film is officially released.
Thanks for your contributions to Laggam (film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Moving to draftspace in advance of film's release, per WP:NFF..
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Thanks for your contributions to Mahendra Nath Kondla. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Thank you for reviewing the article on Mahendra Nath Kondla and for your guidance. I understand the importance of ensuring the subject meets the notability criteria and that the article requires additional reliable sources.
Could you please clarify if the notability needs to be established more for the person (Mahendra Nath Kondla) or for his work (such as the films Sabari and Viraaji)? I would be happy to add the required sources
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shukra (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
