User talk:The Inedible Bulk

I came up with the name The Inedible Bulk when needing a good name for some forums. It was, obviously, a highly edited version of The Incredible Hulk.

There Inc

Are There, Inc. and Second Life really necessary? --Brockert 02:46, Apr 11, 2004 (UTC)

They were linked from the There page, There, Inc. that is. I usually create things linked from a page, but if it's a problem, please feel free to remove the page for There, Inc., and in doing so, remove the link from There as well. Second Life is directly related to There, it's like Macintosh to Windows. --TIB 04:32, Apr 11, 2004 (UTC)

Sigh...

  • Thanks for the vote of confidence on the Village Pump. Unfortunately, the B-Movie Bandit template has been nominated by another user for deletion. The B-Movie Bandit is killing me, I tell ya. - Lucky 6.9 06:33, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)
    • I voted to keep it. --TIB 06:38, Aug 15, 2004 (UTC)

There

Stating the thing about the patches is ok, but we shouldn't try to compromise or displease vandals in an encyclopedic article. [[User:Supadawg|supadawg - Talk]] 18:00, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Yeh. --TIB (talk) 18:42, Aug 21, 2004 (UTC)

Editing

You're marking a lot of your edits as minor edits when they should be marked as regular edits. Don't be so hard on yourself, people who are watching the page want to see your edits too. Go ahead and mark them as major when you add content. - Mescad (recovering minor-edit addict)

I have them auto mark as minor edits. Most of mine are pretty minor. Sometimes I make a major and forget to change it. I've been trying to get out of that habit lately, but sometimes I slip. --TIB (talk) 02:51, Aug 29, 2004 (UTC) (Recovering boredom addict)

I think you may care, and I'm wrong

http://www.champcarfanatics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20208

I was looking at wikipedia today and decided to see what they had on the EARL. The article wasn't sufficiently negative, so I made some changes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indy_Racing_League

Someone else might want to add to that. -- 4.176.57.54 | talk | contributions

(Sig added by TIB)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page you will be blocked from editing. --TIB (talk) 20:43, Sep 4, 2004 (UTC)

World of Warcraft screenshot

Hi.. I replaced the second image in the World of Warcraft article with that new screenshot, I think it looks much better now. Nice one! —Stormie 07:03, Sep 5, 2004 (UTC)

WTCR

http://ps2.ign.com/articles/557/557665p2.html

==John Kerry Remark on User Page==

I stole it from the Sandbox edit by 24.211.133.233. I laughed. --TIB (talk) 01:31, Oct 21, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

I've answered your comment on my talk page. – Ram-Man (comment) (talk)[[]] 14:20, Dec 13, 2004 (UTC)

I like your name.

Ground 04:16, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Should I be worried? --TIB (talk) 03:06, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)

game.com network image

Nice picture, TIB. It fits well with the article. I never bothered with the internet connection myself - it is interesting to see all the stuff that was needed to make it work. Are you still into handheld gaming? I am knee-deep in Advance Wars: Dual Strike on the DS right now. That and the PSP's new web browser and the promise of Grand Theft Auto: Liberty City Stories has me pretty excited. -Armaced 17:29, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

gamecom is the newest portable player i own but if GTA:LCS is as good as it's cracked up to be, it's PSP time. --TIB (talk) 19:39, August 28, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:RichardKyanka-PressPhoto.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:04, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

tagged (personal note)

Thank you

Thank you for helping with the Kelly Clarkson song article--Hotei59 20:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moral Character article

I'm very sorry if I upset you. I appologize. I was RC patroling for vandalism and came across the edit. It looked to me to be blanking.

From WP:VAND:
Blanking
Removing all or significant parts of articles (sometimes replacing the removed content with profanities) is a common vandal edit.

In trying to maintain NPOV, I was not comparing the bulk of the article to my moral compass or judging it in any way, shape or form. Is it not suspicious when an anon editor removes a large chunk of an article and all the edit summary says is "Garbage"? Sorry for the inconvenience. thadius856talk 09:32, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:RichardKyanka-PressPhoto.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RichardKyanka-PressPhoto.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok ☠ 18:42, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Deletion: Therebucks

Therebucks

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Therebucks, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Therebucks. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Torinir ( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options ) 01:15, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Goon's affliction

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Goon's affliction page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki 18:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary

dood, you won 'the_undertow award for best edit summary of the day'

---> sometimes i tell myself I'll preview first. I never do. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The undertow (talk • contribs) 01:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Dangerfield.1997.ap.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dangerfield.1997.ap.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Dangerfield.1997.ap.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Dangerfield.1997.ap.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 05:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Repost of Category:Clothes-free Wikipedians

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Clothes-free Wikipedians, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Clothes-free Wikipedians was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Clothes-free Wikipedians, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 13:30, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thx

Yeah, I did see that and wondered what it was. However, I was editting on my iPod so I couldn't do much. Thx for the tip though —Preceding unsigned comment added by MaulYoda (talk • contribs) 21:05, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MKV and MOV...

Please see my response in Talk:Matroska in your Set top box section. I have the exact same questions and it looks like I'll have to go to the sources to find the answer. Maury (talk) 16:04, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Drew Carey Show episodes images

I replied on the talk page. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 06:06, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: your recent edit to Template:Postvfd

I think you want Template:oldafd or Template:oldafdfull instead. I've put the postvfd template back so it doesn't mess up the historical uses. Rossami (talk) 03:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Probably. But I wonder if it might be better to just use a noinclude comment to note that the template has been deprecated in favor of the newer ones and that it's kept for historical reasons. I'll draft it. Please drop by in a bit and see if you can improve the wording. Rossami (talk) 05:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to 30 Rock, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not make such page moves, even if you consider it to be a "test". Ckatzchatspy 09:28, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dirty Cock → 30 Rock

Worst. Joke. Ever.

Are you seriously that stupid? Must you be so incompetent? Do you have a life?

Well guessing by your edit, the asnwers are probably Yes, Yes and No respectively.

Please leave Wikipedia and never come back. Seriously, go home. No one wants you here.

Proudly speaking of behalf of all users on Wikipedia, Yours Truly - Corn.u.co.pia ♥ Disc.us.sion 09:32, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cornucopia 2008, don't speak on behalf of all users on Wikipedia, particularly when you are so uncivil. The Inedible Bulk, I strongly recommend that you don't do such edits ever again. This is vandalism and it affects a lot of readers. Cenarium (talk) 09:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: My age

Excuse me? Under 13? Where do you get your facts from? If had just looked below at my userboxes, you would have seem I am actually 32. Please do not write random garbage on my talk page. Corn.u.co.pia ♥ Disc.us.sion 11:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you put an irrelevant link on my talk page? Cock and ball torture, I don't think so. And besides, act my age? Look who's talking, "The Inedible Bulk." I'm not the childish one who thinks "Dirty Cock" is funny. So please, don't be a hypocrite. Corn.u.co.pia ♥ Disc.us.sion 12:55, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK FINE, I was a bit childish. I guess I like being random on the net. Look, I'm sorry 'bout what I said, I was just trying to stir something up. I am adamant that you should not have moved 30 Rock to Dirty Cock, but that's in the past now. Friends? Corn.u.co.pia ♥ Disc.us.sion 13:02, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What? No reply? Corn.u.co.pia ♥ Disc.us.sion 13:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, I can't really hold it against him.

His heart is in the right place, that's just a bit more info than people need. He's at least trying. HalfShadow 00:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

G4 speedy declined on Earthman Reggae

Hi there, just dropping by to let you know that I declined the G4 speedy tag you placed on Earthman Reggae because a G4 only applies if the article has previously been deleted as a result of a deletion discussion - i.e. has been through WP:AFD. It does not apply if the article has previously deleted via WP:CSD or WP:PROD. Kind regards, nancy (talk) 06:06, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another reply at nancy's page now

Trent Reznor

Replacing the standard photo of Trent Reznor with one of him taking a piss at a urinal is a stupid joke. Stop vandalizing pages.


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to PageName. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PÆonU (talk) 10:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


PÆonU (talk) 13:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Trentreznor-toronto.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gut-wrenching Scream And Fall Into Distance

Hi, thanks for your message reference this article. As you can see from the AFD - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gut-wrenching Scream And Fall Into Distance - there was a clear consensus that the article failed the WP:Verifiability policy and the WP:Notability guideline. The article lacked any coverage in reliable sources and no one found any during the AFD. Significant coverage in reliable sources is what establishes notability for wikipedia, not any other reason. I hope this explains the reason for the deletion.

If you feel you can find such coverage in reliable sources I would be happy to userfy the article to your userspace for you to add it, or you could just create a new article which meets the notability guideline. You are of course welcome to take my deletion to WP:Deletion Review if you feel my closure of the AFD was incorrect. Davewild (talk) 21:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Disneys Grand Floridian.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Disneys Grand Floridian.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is My Milwaukee

Switched from videogame to game - for lack of a better general category that it fits into (granted it ain't the best fit). If you've a better choice, please feel free to update it further :) Skier Dude (talk) 23:44, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was more of relevance issue

I saw nothing in the intro of the article referring to monkey face, which is why I removed it, not for censorship. If I truely wanted to censor, I would have removed the entire category. Basically: I felt it was Original Research.ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 19:35, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: You are one quiet guy

What file(s) is this? User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 08:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{tb}}

Hello, The Inedible Bulk. You have new messages at Edit Centric's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Edit Centric (talk) 03:11, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for spoiling my day.--Otterathome (talk) 17:56, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources look unreliable, so WP:BLP forces it to be removed.--Otterathome (talk) 18:13, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shameless thankspam

FlyingToaster Barnstar

Hello The Inedible Bulk! Thank you so much for your (slightly misogynistic) support in my recent RfA, which passed with a tally of 126/32/5. I am truly humbled by the trust you placed in me, and will endeavor to live up to that trust. FlyingToaster

Articles for deletion nomination of Joe Zombie

I have nominated Joe Zombie, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Zombie (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 15:15, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Scoutmob

A tag has been placed on Scoutmob, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Terrillja talk 19:46, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Amer Cons.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Amer Cons.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Amer Cons.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Amer Cons.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cutaway gag redirecting to Family Guy

I've redirected cutaway gag to Family Guy because editors were including FG and other cartoons on Cutaway (filmmaking). I'm not familiar enough with Family Guy to start a cutaway gag article, but I think one should be created since it appears to be pivotal to FG and other shows like it. I would have classed it as a comic device rather than a genre, though. Am86 (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ultravox (software)

The article Ultravox (software) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable project; appears to describe an attempt some years back to launch a product (perhaps using Wikipedia as advertising), which did not succeed. Official site and only inline ref both dead links.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:38, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This failed, due to a lovely admin realizing that it was indeed a thing. Sure, it's not a thing anymore, but it was, and that's what matters. --TIB (talk) 07:51, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Information icon Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Naming law in Sweden has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, The Inedible Bulk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, The Inedible Bulk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, The Inedible Bulk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, The Inedible Bulk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Yourweek" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Yourweek. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 14#Yourweek until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yourweek for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yourweek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yourweek until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

signed, Rosguill talk 17:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Welcome2

Template:Welcome2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:22, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Commander in Chief (TV series" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Commander in Chief (TV series and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Commander in Chief (TV series until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:00, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maurizio Mian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fortune. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Other device connected to my account

My other Google account connes to miy device 2603:6011:5B40:500:F909:24E:83B8:C1F7 (talk) 18:29, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who you are. TIB (talk) 02:27, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]