User talk:TammyMoet

Hello, TammyMoet! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! DuncanHill (talk) 15:58, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Stars

The Reference Desk Barnstar
Wow. I can't believe you haven't got one of these already. I have never seen an editor so devoted to helping out all of the desks. So take this with pride, you are a real help to everybody. :) Queenie 15:09, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. Ask me if you want any help. :) Queenie 18:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help! I've been blocked and I don't know why!!

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
TammyMoet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
88.108.247.63 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

This IP range is blocked to prevent vandalism. Bona fide users should please request unblocking and checking for "IP block exemption" -- apologies for the disruption, and thank you for understanding.

Decline reason: Due to your lack of mainspace edits, I don't think I can trust you with IP block exemption. I'll mention it to FT2, though. Mangojuicetalk 13:29, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well checked, but unlikely to be a problem. Thanks for checking, Mango -- and yes, IPBE is probably appropriate :) FT2 (Talk | email) 13:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IP Block Exemption

IP block exempt

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. User:FT2 (talk) 07:27, 7 November 2013 (UTC) FT2 (Talk | email) 13:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC) Thank you for this. Please can you explain what Mango meant by "lack of mainspace edits"? I don't feel that my knowledge extends to editing pages yet!--TammyMoet (talk) 14:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re.

Don't worry about it, the same thing happened to me (see my archives). If someone gets blocked for vandalism, their account is checkusered to see what computer IP that account came from, and to see what other Wikipedia accounts run from that IP. Whoever did that vandalism on your computer [I'm sure it wasn't you] got blocked, and they checkusered that IP and your account came up. There's no need to worry about it now it's over. And about Mango's "not enough mainspace edits" - if you have more editing experience, people will trust you more. Ease yourself in gently - maybe start off with fixing things in articles about things that interest you, then maybe try help clearing WP:BACKLOG - not everybody has to make big, magnificent edits and have ten million FAs to their name. I certainly don't. ;) You can also fight vandalism - that's really helpful. Then, maybe once you have a thousand or so edits, apply for rollback, which really helps revert vandalism. Don't feel rushed, take things at your own pace, at your own time. After all, everybody has to start somewhere. ;) Queenie 18:16, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re blocks

I noticed your block a while ago while looking at the list of unblock requests but wasn't sure what to do about it (hey, even us admins don't know everything ☺). One thing Queenie didn't mention was that what you were caught by was what's known as a "rangeblock". Under some circumstances a whole range of IP addresses may be blocked - sometimes (as in your case) bona fide editors who happen to be in that range are blocked as they just happen to be in the range that's blocked. This is known around here as collateral damage. This in no way reflects on you, and will have nothing to do with edits made on your computer, or by your account. Queenie's giving you good advice above, so I'll bow out - give me a shout on my talkpage if you want. Cheers, Tonywalton Talk 00:19, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock IP request

{{unblock-auto reviewed|88.108.237.161|{{checkuserblock}}:This IP range is blocked to prevent vandalism. Bona fide users should please request unblocking and checking for "IP block exemption" -- apologies for the disruption, and thank you for understanding|Lar|decline=reason — Tonywalton Talk 20:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)}}[reply]


Many apologies for having to ask this again, but we had to reboot the server and it appears that our IP address is part of a blocked range. We suspect that it's because our ISP is Tiscali. --TammyMoet (talk) 19:47, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've reset (I hope) your IP Block exemption (I hope). so

IP block exempt

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. User:FT2 (talk) 07:27, 7 November 2013 (UTC) Tonywalton Talk 20:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If that hasn't worked, please place {{adminhelp}} on here and someone should be along to help. Tonywalton Talk 20:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tony - thanks for this, yes it seems to be working fine now! --TammyMoet (talk) 20:47, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As Mr Burns would say - "ex-celllent". Tonywalton Talk 20:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference desk regulars

Hello, TammyMoet. I noticed your contributions and took the liberty of adding your signature to this list. I hope that's alright. (Otherwise revert, of course). ---Sluzzelin talk 08:58, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow cool! Many thanks! TammyMoet (talk)

I've got a badge!

I prowl the Reference Desk

.

--TammyMoet (talk) 11:56, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, TammyMoet. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

╟─TreasuryTag►hemicycle─╢ 19:19, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference desk

this is a general message to all concerned, not a personalised response Hello, I have removed opinion based answers to the question on firefighting on the humanities reference desk. Please note that offering opinions can lead to arguments as was beginning to happen on this topic. [1] Sorry for the inconvenience.83.100.251.196 (talk) 11:50, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commendation!

Civility Award
for your thoughtful and informative amendment on the historical aspect of British vs. Scots as an epithet. Deborahjay (talk) 10:01, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! I worried about what I could have used instead of "English" last night, but came to the conclusion that, because I didn't have any evidence when I posted that it wasn't English, then English was appropriate. Bless you! --TammyMoet (talk) 11:34, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Because I myself work in period-specific translations for an archive, I deal a lot with nomenclature of warring sides and related matters of POV and the often-ridiculed political correctness. Besides, I appreciate when editors come back and clarify, something I do too. I wish this were a practice more honored in the commission than the breach – not to mention editors whom I wish would think before they posted...! -- Cheers, Deborahjay (talk) 12:48, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gasp!

! I'm blushing! Matt Deres (talk) 21:50, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well... when you get to my age things like that lose their mystery! My apologies. --TammyMoet (talk) 08:23, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, no; don't apologize! I'm not upset, just shocked! Geez, you really do have to watch the quiet ones, don't you? Matt Deres (talk) 01:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AWB and Words to avoid

There is a discussion at the Village Pump regarding using AWB to semi-automatically remove WP:Words to avoid. You got this notice because you have participated in a discussion regarding this in the recent past. Your input is welcomed. Gigs (talk) 03:57, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted question on malysz

Hi, I deleted the question on malysz as nearly no one who responsded appeared to think it was a genuine question and given the history of similar questions from that IP. I'm not sure if you felt the same, but feel free to discuss it here Wikipedia talk:Reference desk#Why can't X be a Y word: Proposed response Nil Einne (talk) 11:21, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ref desk trolling

The "dando" "question" is a clear ref to the murder of Jill Dando. I've left a note at WT:RD - as I'm not sure of the best course of action in this case, you might want to take a look. Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:56, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I'd not clicked that one, but I was going to put something on the RD because I had my suspicions about this one. --TammyMoet (talk) 18:05, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted my post

Please restore my post at Ref. Desk/Misc. that you deleted [2]. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 22:30, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm terribly sorry, I haven't a clue what happened there, and I certainly don't remember even seeing your post let alone deleting it! I've reinserted the text where you put it though. I do apologise, my laptop's been playing up terribly recently and I wonder if it has anything to do with that? --TammyMoet (talk) 10:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for fixing that. BTW I like your Longfellow poem. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 11:13, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, TammyMoet. You have new messages at Marco polo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, TammyMoet. You have new messages at WP:RD/H.
Message added 12:24, 16 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

No offence intended

My question at Ref Desk Humanities was not made with the intention of offending British editors, especially those who had relations who served in the British Armed Forces during WWII. Reading your comment, it appears your father had fought in the war. I apologise if my question and comments regarding Churchill caused offence. They were directed solely against Churchill, not against the RAF, other branches of the British military, or British civilians who lost their lives in the Luftwaffe aerial bombings.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 07:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, my father was in the RAF. My family were victims of the Coventry Blitz. So I guess the subject is a bit of a "red rag" to me! I'm not offended by it, but the other thing you must remember is that Churchill did not fight the war single-handedly. I have heard (and there is more public support for) that Bomber Harris, whose idea it was to bomb Dresden into submission, should have been the one on trial, and personally I would not argue with that. So if you want to put Churchill on trial, you should be looking really at putting everyone else responsible for those raids on trial - even those who were "only following orders", just as happened at Nuremberg. --TammyMoet (talk) 09:51, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry about your family having been victims at Coventry. It's easy to let emotion get in the way as to me both world wars were a carnage and slaughter that could have been avoided. As a fighting unit, the RAF were definitely superior to the Luftwaffe, and the film, The Battle of Britain always brings tears to my eyes. The problem with wars is that the financiers and politicians who make the wars in the first place stay home and the normal people go out and fight and die. The politicians eventually make peace but for the grieving there is no peace. I suppose you are right about Bomber Harris having been the culprit. Once again, I'm sorry I brought up painful memories for you by my question.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 11:25, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reference desk remark

Can I just say that I meant my remark about your remark to be light. I had no problem with your aside about a tie. Keep up the wit and wisdom. Best to you. Richard Avery (talk) 21:32, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No offence taken! Sometimes it's hard for us UK folk to understand other forms of English! Thank you for posting here on the subject, and have a good day. --TammyMoet (talk) 08:16, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Science Refdesk: soccer injuries

ha! DMacks (talk) 14:44, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks so much. "When push comes to shove" is exactly what I was looking for. L33th4x0r (talk) 19:17, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Law & Order SVU SEASON 9 EPISODE UNDERCOVER

Hello, my name's Sean. How are you doing? I'm new to wikipedia. Is it okay for me to post this message on your wikipedia talk page? Have you seen the Episode called Undercover?

In the Episode Undercover, Lowell Harris is trying to rape Olivia, but Fin manages to save Olivia's life. Fin manages to arrest Harris. In the Interrogation room, Harris's Defense Attorney shows up.

Olivia says, "Harris tried to rape me."

Harris lies, "I wasn't trying to rape Olivia." Does Harris's Defense Attorney believe that Harris was trying to rape Olivia? Since I think that Harris's Defense Attorney is evil, I also think that Harris gave a lot of money to his Defense Attorney. Is Harris's Defense Attorney evil? Did Harris give a lot of money to his Defense Attorney? Does Harris's Defense Attorney want to show fake evidence proving that Harris wasn't trying to rape Olivia?(Sean Archer123 (talk) 07:18, 20 September 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

I don't watch Law and Order. You should post this question on the Entertainment reference desk where you might find someone who can answer your query, or perhaps there is an online forum where such things are discussed.--TammyMoet (talk) 08:07, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MESSAGE

http://www.1channel.ch/watch-5173-Law-Order-Special-Victims-Unit

If you go straight to the website, then you'll be able to watch Law & Order SVU Episodes. Do you have time to watch Law & Order SPECIAL VICTIMS UNIT SEASON 9 EPISODE UNDERCOVER?(Sean Archer123 (talk) 08:16, 20 September 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

No I don't watch fiction at all. --TammyMoet (talk) 08:16, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MESSAGE

Can you please watch the episode Undercover when you get a chance? When will you be able to get a chance to watch the episode called Undercover?(Sean Archer123 (talk) 09:45, 20 September 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

No I won't. Sorry. But you have asked the question on the correct desk, and I am sure you will get a reply in due course. --TammyMoet (talk) 11:54, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your user talk page

Hi Tammy, I noticed your post at WT:RD about getting unwanted questions here. No you cannot "block" an editor from your page in the technical sense, but that doesn't mean you have to accept anything and everything that gets posted here. The relevant wording is here in the third sentence, which does read a little vague. Basically, just ask the editor clearly not to post on your talk page. If they continue to do so, contact me or another active admin. These kind of things are judged on their merits, for instance if someone is posting clearly project-related messages and you have a rule against anyone with an "R" in their username posting, not much will be done. In this case though, the editor is clearly not aiming to improve the project in any way. If you don't want to receive these messages then they will be asked to stop, then told to stop, then blocked if necessary. Franamax (talk) 19:35, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this, Franamax. No wonder I couldn't find it! Said user has posted another message after yours, and so I'll give him what they call in Yorkshire "The Scarborough Warning". If he comes back I'll let you know. Cheers! --TammyMoet (talk) 20:36, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MESSAGE

Have you seen Frequency film which was made during 2000? On Wikipedia, you'll be able to find the plot summary for Frequency. In the movie called Frequency, it's 1999. A detective uses his late father's ham radio. Suddenly, the detective's using the ham radio to contact his father who is in the past. The detective's father died during 1969. Frequency has to be a Science Fiction movie.(Sean Archer123 (talk) 20:08, 20 September 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

Look I've told you I don't watch fiction. I would like you to stop posting on my talk page. It's not appropriate use of Wikipedia. Thank you. --TammyMoet (talk) 20:37, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've warned the editor on this conduct. Franamax (talk) 20:40, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
He turned out to be Timmy Polo, a previously banned pest. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:18, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citations- how to

Lots of helpful (if technical) information at WP:CITE.

The easiest way to add citations is to use the Cite link at the top of the edit box (next to the help link). If you click it, it opens out another toolbar immediately below. On the left is a box marked "Templates". Put the cursor where you want the reference, click the down arrow in the templates box, and pick whether you are citing a website, a book, a newspaper or a journal. It pops up a form to fill in - fill it in and click Insert and it puts a formatted citation in where the cursor is. If you are going to refer to that source more than once in the article, on of the boxes asks for a name for the reference (you can call it something helpful eg the author's name or the book/newspaper name). Then, the next time you want to refer to that source in the article, click the little checklist sign next to "Named References" and it'll pop up a box with the name you gave the reference. Give me a shout if you any of that doesn't make sense. If you want to test it, click on User:TammyMoet/Sandbox and give it a try.--Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:12, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't see the Cite link, click on MY PREFERENCES and go into EDITING. Select SHOW EDIT TOOLBAR and also the ENHANCED EDITING TOOLBAR and the DIALOGS under Usability features. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:17, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - now I know where to find it! Excellent! --TammyMoet (talk) 09:10, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted post

There is a discussion which concerns you at Wikipedia talk:Reference desk#Deleted Birther soapboxing. SpinningSpark 19:38, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hi

thanks for your response regarding a patent agent on the reference desk. however I am not really ready to file for a patent and would like to find more a partner to help evaluate ideas with. do you have any advice on how to find such a person? (or if you yourself are one.) Of course I also lack funding (i.e. am very poor foreigner) but the patent costs are low in dollars. Mostly I am looking for the evaluation partner. Thanks Tammmy! Ranbir — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.92.81.230 (talk) 15:52, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It all depends on where you are. If you are in the UK I'd recommend you consult your local Chamber of Commerce. If you're not in the UK, then maybe you can find a similar organisation where you live. Good luck. --TammyMoet (talk) 15:55, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Tammy, I'm reading the reply here so you don't have to cross-post it. I am living in a poor country with no real way to find an appropriate local person, as there is almost 0 economy for this here. I would like to team up with someone in a better country who has time and resources to collaborate with me. Do you think I can write to British or American people? How do I find the right one? By the way my inspiration is this story: http://www.storyofmathematics.com/20th_hardy.html
Ranbir — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.92.81.230 (talk) 16:24, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Which country are you in? --TammyMoet (talk) 19:54, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am temporarily in Hungary which is a very poor Eastern European country. I have some distant family here. My family's background is very poor but educated (unfortunately in mathematics, which is very poorly paid and not connected with any form of capital). Let me know if you have any ideas - or just some free time to look over a few dozen inventions with me! Of course I don't expect you to be left out of any benefits. Thanks Tammy. Ranbir.84.3.160.86 (talk) 09:51, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hungary is a member of the EU. I think what you need to do is investigate the business support provisions in Hungary. Before you say "I want technical input not business input", you need both. In the UK, the Chamber of Commerce would be the starting point for both inputs. Some of the links on this page will be of benefit to you (you have to scroll down). I see they also have Chambers of Commerce. I am not in the least bit technically minded! --TammyMoet (talk) 12:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In case you missed it

Took me a while to notice and reply to your comment [3] so I thought I would let you know. --BozMo talk 18:00, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Stephen King It

I did a google/yahoo search and the book did not seem to exist in large print. Can you please send a link of the website where it's sold for 25 cents? Thank you! Venustar84 (talk) 17:52, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've just done another search and I can't find the 25cent price, suspect it's been sold. However, googling "stephen king it large print" throws up lots of sites that sell large print books, including Stephen King's own site. It may be the sort of thing you have to either request or check regularly on specialist sites for. Sorry I can't help you further. --TammyMoet (talk) 19:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You may also find this site useful, I think it may be where the 25cents came from. --TammyMoet (talk) 19:03, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Science ref desk ping

Hi, just in case you're not checking yesterday's thread anymore, I thought I'd ping you about my reply. I've not used the site but seems to be what you were looking for (apologies if not) Jebus989✰ 12:25, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That does look promising, think I've heard of it before. Thank you so much! --TammyMoet (talk) 16:26, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Xena's inspiration

Perhaps this "real Spartan Princess was a little inspiration: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arachidamia Venustar84 (talk) 07:57, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --TammyMoet (talk) 13:04, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit wars?

I've been notified that I've been reported as Edit warring, but I've looked at the page I was directed to and can't see my name mentioned. Can someone please explain?

Hi TammyMoet. There's no record of a report on you at the edit-war noticeboard, and I can't see any evidence in your recent history that you have been involved in an edit war - for that matter, I can't find a record of you being warned, either. I'd hazard a guess that there's been a mistake or misunderstanding somewhere along the line - at any rate, you don't need to worry about any imminent sanctions for edit-warring. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Yunshui! --TammyMoet (talk) 13:36, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For your help at the RefDesk with my silly questions. Can you sign my guestbook? There's a link at the top of my userpage. Thanks. Miss Bono [zootalk]☆ 18:10, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Concerned editor

Hi TammyMoet, per your query of me concerning "sectarianism" on the Humanties Reference Desk I would hope that in the future WP:AGF may be allowed since I see that your edit above that and seeming in response to μηδείς was described by you as "STFU". Also if you are going to ask a query of another editor it can be perceived as rude to then reply as indifferent as you did to that request. Per: Wikipedia:Reference desk/Guidelines. Thank you, and here is sincerely hoping this was a misunderstanding. Market St.⧏ ⧐ Diamond Way 13:11, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't trying to be rude to you, I genuinely couldn't understand what you wrote. If you read it again, you will see the ungrammatical wording you used. As for Medeis, she is getting on my pip and it's about time someone brought her into line. There is no good faith about the language she used, it was unwarranted and offensive. --TammyMoet (talk) 18:30, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, grammar is a weak point for me, here's to being more detailed on both our parts for the future. Market St.⧏ ⧐ Diamond Way 18:33, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Big Bash League, with gratuitous Blake quote

TammyMoet (as a small cat who is a mixture of gravity and waggery, like Smart's Jeoffry, may I address you as "T. Middy"?) it would appear that the BBL is on free to air TV in Dear Old Blighty. Unlike Tests and the domestic T20, which are on Pay-TV. "O Rose thou art sick", etc, etc.--Shirt58 (talk) 11:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry mate, it's the British Basketball League! I shall just have to wait for the IPL on ITV4 in April for my cricket fix. But thanks all the same! --TammyMoet (talk) 22:06, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Can you please see my response at Ref_Desk_Science? Ben. Ben-Natan (talk) 21:45, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me why you chose to delete my response...

...as you did here. It's common courtesy at least in an edit summary to note why you are deleting the work of others. --Jayron32 21:03, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well I can only say the first time I have seen your posting is when I clicked the link you've given me. I'm completely at a loss as to what happened there. --TammyMoet (talk) 14:23, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries then. Glitches happen. --Jayron32 14:27, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. --TammyMoet (talk) 14:28, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My friend, Hilter

I've erased that trolling about "no proof" from the Humanities Desk. If you'd prefer it stay feel free to revert. μηδείς (talk) 16:11, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, if I'd have had more time I'd have deleted instead of challenging it myself! --TammyMoet (talk) 18:35, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Please read this FYI note. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 14:41, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Early Christian festival query on Refdesk

Hi Tammy

I was going to put in a link to our article Jewish Christians, with the explanation that you were probably already familiar with this but that it might be useful background for other readers. However, as that RD is currently semi-protected, I couldn't, so I thought I'd mention it here instead. Look forward to more informed answers, as Jewish/Early Christian history is a topic that interests me (as someone with a little Jewish descent who became a Christian atheist around 10 years old and is now following the Wiccan path :-) ). {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 185.74.232.130 (talk) 18:10, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Yes it's fascinating isn't it. I'm personally "spiritual but not religious from a Christian background", following a very eclectic path at the moment. I'll answer on the desk anyway. --TammyMoet (talk) 15:32, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

What happened here? Hacked or some kind of weird error? Hope you're well. Nice to see an old username I recognise. --Dweller (talk) Old fashioned is the new thing! 11:58, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Dweller! Literally have no idea what happened, I got tagged and responded and that, I thought, was that. I'm OK thanks, past 2.5 years have been a trial as for all, but I did have my left shoulder replaced in Oct 19 and had to cut down on my online stuff then. Thank you for reaching out, hope all is well for you. TammyMoet (talk) 20:53, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, that sounds really unpleasant. Hope it works out as well as possible. Covid has hit my onwiki time significantly, as RL has been exceptionally busy. Thankfully, all are well. Best, --Dweller (talk) Old fashioned is the new thing! 09:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]