User talk:Subverted
Sparassid - wagga waggahey, as i just read you're interested in sparassidae, do you have any idea what species the one from wagga wagga here (or possibly the others) could be? :) --Sarefo (talk) 10:50, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
I'm the guy that took the picture of the trapdoor spiderHi, You wrote this:
First let me thank you for your response. I didn't collect that spider. I came along when somebody was and I took this picture. It was his intention to keep it I believe. I read on the internet that trapdoor spiders might be becoming endangered because of habitat loss. How do people know that? There's still a lot of undeveloped habitat in Southern California. Is somebody out doing surveys and they can't find as many as they expect? I thought the two clearly visible (after expanding it) depressions on the abdomen were associated with the book lungs. They seemed to be in about the right place based on the information from this image: http://giantspiders.com/anatomy.html If they aren't associated with the book lungs do you know what they are? I also had read that only the young can dig the holes. I wasn't quite sure I had quite understood that, but it sounds like I did based on what you said. Will the adult even make an attempt to dig a new burrow after it's been pulled out? Anyway thanks again for your response and I appreciate your concerns about the trapdoor spiders. Regards, Dave davefoc@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davefoc (talk • contribs) 06:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Bump-proof locksIn reply to your message: you're correct, however, in the context of pin tumbler locks, there are none that are bump-proof. It's a problem with the design. 70.91.178.185 (talk) 17:48, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
TalkbackHello, Subverted. You have new messages at Ged UK's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. GedUK 14:57, 7 June 2009 (UTC) Mark LloydMarcus0609 created the page and later blanked it. We take this as an indication that the author does not want it around and remove it. You are welcome to have the best version at User:Subverted/Mark Lloyd. I have restored it there for you. You can see why, it was not retained when you look at the page, it may not be the person you think it is. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:01, 15 August 2009 (UTC) The article Robert Daley (filmmaker) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Nat Gertler (talk) 03:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
L. desertaThanks for your note. If you've got references, the anti-alarmist figures you've presented would make a great addition. I've been browsing around, adding to the article every tidbit of information I can scrape up from a scholarly source, and haven't found any yet that express this less-elevated danger, only that there are confirmed cases of infections. Interestingly, however, I was browsing the Arachnoboards and found LOTS of closeup shots of folks handling these spiders with bare hands-- something I've never seen done with L. reclusa. Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 04:06, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
I finally found a bit of info for you to parse into article form, if you really would like to.
No specifics, but still some good information. As for special precautions, I try to be careful but it is generally unnecessary beyond making sure that you do not get one of the spiders on you unless you know where they are, I actually have a reference for this from another paper: "Gertsch mentions hand-collecting hundreds of recluses without receiving bites" I am much more nervous handling grass, wolf, and jumping spiders(all of which have bitten me) than these spiders, not that I do not give them the respect the so definitely deserve... (As for knowing my stuff, I like to think I do, but I have no qualifications beyond my bothering academics with my questions and having found a few interesting things.) - Subverted (talk • contribs) 06:42, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Comment in sigyea, I'm on bugguide, done a few stuff there, but prefer to do what I can on Wikipedia :D. Bugboy52.4 ¦ =-= 02:25, 20 March 2011 (UTC) LolThanks for the extended laugh, this made my day: [2] Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 23:42, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Type of tarantula in AfghanistanHello, I am a US soldier currently deployed to Afghanistan in the Mehtar Lam province. Several of my soldiers have reported sitings of large brown spiders in their living quarters. Some of them have been saying it's a camel spider, others have claimed it's a tarantula. Being a medic, this raises some alarm. Soldiers are not incredibly bright, and like to keep often dangerous types of animals and insects as pets or mascots. In my aid station today, I spotted one of these big guys and was able to snap a photo. If you could email me so that I could send you the photo, I would greatly appreciate it. I am having some trouble finding a site to identify this one. The largest problem is that in every search I conduct, people are only seeming interested in camel spiders which aren't an arachnid at all, but a member of the crustecian family. I am unable to find any sites that have any info on common spiders in the middle east and asia. It was rather large, the torso being about 2 1/2" to 3" inches in length, and about an inch wide. Or, about the size of an average adult male thumb. The legs spread out over 4" to 6", or the size of a palm. Definitely not camel spider. It was a tan/gray color with very fine hair. I tried to scoop him up for further investigation, but he ran around the side of the box and fell. It was on a high shelf. To my amazement however, he floated safely to the floor via the web he had attached to the box, and sped away. Not common with a tarantula. In fact, I've never heard of a tarantula dangling from a single line of web, although they are able to spin large webs. You can reach me at kevin.nakata@ymail.com If you can't identify it, I'm hoping that perhaps you'll be able to point me in the right directin. Thanks in advance for all of your help. CPL Nakata, Kevin FOB Kalagush, Afg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.26.214.163 (talk) 06:23, 23 March 2012 (UTC) Hi, ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Hello, Subverted. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Subverted. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Nomination of Joshua Claybourn for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joshua Claybourn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Claybourn (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Notifying you about the discussion, since you have made significant contributions to articles related to this subject. --IndyNotes (talk) 04:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Subverted. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
New ArticleI created this article and saw that you had an interest in making one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_Privilege#See_Also . As Per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Paintedxbird#Female_Privilege_article . Feel free to add to it. BlackAmerican (talk) 06:29, 11 July 2022 (UTC) |