Hello, Standard2211, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I've done some tidying up of this - references always go after punctuation, we refer to article subject by surname only, etc. But each of the references still needs to be better formatted: what is displayed to the reader should be enough to identify the source, so that if the web link fails they still have a properly referenced article. "Annual reviews" is not a full reference! It is best to use the {{cite journal}}, {{cite book}}, {{cite web}} and {{cite news}} templates, which help you to include all the appropriate fields. They should be available from the edit screen if you click on "Cite" and then choose them from the drop-down menu under "Templates". (Unless this is a "gadget" or a "preference" which I have chosen for myself). PamD00:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, the colours you choose for your user page make the list of "Saves" almost unreadable. Blue on blue-ish pink is a poor colour combination, not enough contrast. PamD00:54, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Isadore Perlman, and it appears to include material copied directly from .
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:35, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. - Happysailor(Talk)20:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi, Standard ... I came across your article on Cohen while patrolling new Medicine articles, and wanted to give you some pointers per this edit (since I see you've created a lot of new articles). Per Wikipedia naming conventions, we don't use "Dr" in text (that could refer to an MD, PhD, etc). Also, we reduce capital letters per MOS#ALLCAPS. Per WP:FN, citations go after punctuation, with no space. And date ranges use an WP:ENDASH. Thanks for all your contributions! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:45, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I recently came across one of the articles you created (D. Bernard Amos), and I noticed that there was no Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography tag on the talk page, or on the talk page of the many other biographies you've created. I wondered if you were aware of that WikiProject, and whether you would consider creating talk pages for those articles in future, with the {{WPBiography}} template? I'm going to do it now for that article, as an example. There used to be a bot that did this tagging, but it clearly isn't running right now as it seems a fair number of biography articles are going untagged. Carcharoth (talk) 01:01, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for starting Cahill article
I came across the stub article you started for George F. Cahill, and what an interesting story he has! I have started to polish around the edges of it a bit, and I hope to add a little bit more substance as well. Anything else you have to add would I'm sure be useful. KConWiki (talk) 04:11, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Very much appreciate
…your creating the page for Gus Fried (Josef Fried). I will link to it now that I know it is here, and perhaps add as time permits. He was on my graduate committee, as an Emeritus prof in Chem at Chicago. He worked hard through, until very late in his life, and some of my most inspirational moments came from interactions with him—late night chats when he found me working in our lab, down the hall from his continuing 2-post doc emeritus operation (including his praise, once, for my well-chosen Art Historian spouse, who would occasionally join me in lab, late; his response in a group meeting, as to why he felt a particular mechanism was preferable among the possible explanations of an observation: "chemische Gefühl" (chemical intuition, literally, "chemical feeling"); his ponderings aloud as to why, from an evolutionary perspective, oxygen-rich appendages akin to the guaicyl and syringyl moieties of phenylpropanoids appeared to make broadly useful appendages to chemical cores in early preclinical medichem; and so on and so on. I was also fortunate to have inherited an array of books not wanted by the Chicago library, including much of his steroid and terpenoid libraries, and so I cherish passing on to students examples of rich learning resources that once inspired this tough but grand gentleman of synthetic and medicinal chemistry. It is no small feat, the course he took from Europe to America, from industry to a named chair at Chicago, through the many compound structure types he addressed, and in so doing to have earned the respect of E.J. Corey and so many others. Cheers, thanks again, and apologies for the reminiscing. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 04:37, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Standard2211. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Girth Summit were:
With no references to reliable, independent secondary sources, the information cannot be verified and the notability cannot be assessed. I also note that there is no possible justification for the long, promotional quote from the company's website. We are not interested in what a company says about itself - we are interested only in what reliable, independent sources say about it.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Newzit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Newzit, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Standard2211!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GirthSummit (blether)11:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Newzit, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Hello, Standard2211. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Newzit".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Your edit to Raymond E. Zirkle has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. MER-C18:42, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
