Hello, Sricsi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I undid your revision on Lady GaGa for a reason, Sricsi. (Sorry about saying it was copyrighted, I had spam on my computer so it took me to a different page on your link and I didn't notice.) Not only is it revealing, but it is too revealing for a picture on a page of someone with such fame. She is barely wearing anything, and it is inappropriate. I will leave it up there for now, but I want you to know that this picture is innapropriate for someone with fame this large. -- Dste 15:42, 14 October 2013 (EST)
October 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Artpop may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Template:Lady Gaga, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!See terms and conditions.20:17, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! —IB[ Poke ]05:50, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Lady Gaga pics
I don't know how you do it but you always get to find free images of Gaga. Have you seen this album? Can you see if the uploader can do a CC-BY-SA change of any of the closeups? It would be a brilliant profile pic. —IB[ Poke ]04:02, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I could try to contact him, but they look quite professional. Honestly, I doubt he would want them to be used freely. I just hope some more HQ photos will emerge as the tour progresses. --Sricsi (talk) 10:44, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Just tell him that Wikipedia wants to just link to the picture. If he can change for a day, you can upload and the bot can update the status as Flickrreviewed. He can revoke the license later. —IB[ Poke ]12:49, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Sricsi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Sricsi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Sricsi, I have reverted your move. This needs to go through WP:RM and needs to be a technical request, rather than an editorial. So please go through the proper channels. —IB[ Poke ]10:10, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I hope you did not feel that I was being against your edits and maybe see that I'm working with you in doing the correct thing. You are amazing. :) —IB[ Poke ]10:25, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
@Sricsi just wanted to swing by and say what wonderful work you have been doing across the Lady Gaga articles! VEry impressive how you are able to obtain the Flickr pics. Keep it up! —IB[ Poke ]17:11, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How can it say that the song was released this year, if it was only released as a single in France? It still doesn’t change the fact that it was originally released in 2011. And the fact that it says Dec. 2, 2022 in the infobox makes it a bit misleading in my opinion, if it only was one single release in only one country rather then internationally. Marius1603 (talk) 23:08, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The infobox always states the date when the song saw its single release. That's the case with all other Gaga songs, as well, does not matter when the album was released. And the lead section literally starts with a sentence which states that the song is from a 2011 album. --Sricsi (talk) 11:23, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article Free Woman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Free Woman for comments about the article, and Talk:Free Woman/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GagaNutella -- GagaNutella (talk) 21:42, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I just wanted to thank you that you took care of my grammar mistakes in this article and improved it. I'll edit it tomorrow, to adress the issues you pointed out, and probably I'll add audio sample. (But overall it wasn't that bad, right..?) infsai (talkie? UwU) 22:51, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Infsai: No, they were minor grammatic mistakes. A bigger flaw was writing psychedelic as the genre of the song, because clearly that's not true, and not what they meant in the linked article. I'm not even sure 'torch song' is a good choice as the genre, but I haven't had time to read more of the linked sources, to get a better view on the consensus on that. I also removed the copy-pasted paragraph from the Live performances section – it's enough to put a See also note there, it's pointless to write the exact same things in two separate articles. I will also try to add some more reviews to the article when I have some time. But anyway, thank you for creating the article, it's great of you! :) --Sricsi (talk) 23:07, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, English isn't my first language, so sometimes I don't get word's meaning in different contexts, especially that English has tons of words meaning numerous things or can be used as a verb or adjective, you know. So, thanks for pointing that out! And yes, I'm also not sure if a torch song is a genre (I mean, the only song I know that has been classified this way is "The Archer", and it's not put in genres). And maybe I also labled it this way, hence production-wise it kinda reminds me of "deja vu" by Olivia Rodrigo..
And about more reviews, to be honest I only based this article on what I could find in Joanne article with quite limited research for more album reviews, because there are not much of this song reviews. But I guess since there are some refs citing only this song + sources about multiple events (besides Joanne reviews, there are Chromatica Ball reviews too), I guess the song passes WP:NSONGS, and it's been on my mind for some time to create article about it. Just one more time, thanks for fixing it! :) infsai (talkie? UwU) 00:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
DYK for Free Woman
On 9 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Free Woman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lady Gaga said she was in a dark state of mind when writing the song "Free Woman" but got over it after completing the song? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Free Woman. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Free Woman), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
The article Sine from Above you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sine from Above for comments about the article, and Talk:Sine from Above/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GagaNutella -- GagaNutella (talk) 14:41, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your work on Gaga articles! If you ever do translation work, I'd love to see the entry about me translated for hu-Wiki one day Either way, keep up the great work here at en-Wiki and elsewhere. Seems you're also a Miley fan, so I hope you're as excited about her new album as I am. Happy editing! ---Another Believer(Talk)16:33, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I'm not really doing any translations, and I hardly ever edit the Hungarian Wikipedia. And yeah, I am - can't wait for Endless Summer Vacation :). --Sricsi (talk) 23:16, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! Thank you for reviewing "911" so swiftly. Well, to be honest, I have never reviewed any GA-nominees, so I'm not really sure about the criteria. In fact, I didn't know it's something anybody's allowed to do :D. I could look into that, but I can't promise anything, and if I do try to do it, it would have to be one of the shorter articles – I would not dare to touch Born This Way, it's so complex. I'm not even sure if I'll have sufficient time for major improvements on other articles due to personal stuff, but I still plan to nominate "Bloody Mary", "Is That Alright?" and Dive Bar Tour. By the way, have you tried contacting User:IndianBio? He used to edit quite a number of Gaga articles, and even though he doesn't really do that anymore, he might be up for reviewing, which might be a bit more undemanding task. --Sricsi (talk) 21:38, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't say anybody, but if you know very well how Wikipedia works, how to write an article with reliable sources, and if you're not one of the main contributors in the recents edits, you can review. When we nominate an article, we expect that it's almost ready to goes to GA status, it just needs suggestions to improve it. You basically need to read the whole article and check the sources, images, and copy violation. You can take a look at WP:GAI. Anyways, it'd be amazing if you have time to do it, I'm sure you're capable. About IndianBio, I miss him a lot, he is one of the best editors I know. GagaNutellatalk03:28, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article Is That Alright? you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Is That Alright? for comments about the article, and Talk:Is That Alright?/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GagaNutella -- GagaNutella (talk) 14:21, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article Bloody Mary (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bloody Mary (song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Bloody Mary (song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GagaNutella -- GagaNutella (talk) 15:22, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On 5 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bloody Mary (song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a Lady Gaga song became popular 11 years after its release, when videos showing Jenna Ortega, as Wednesday Addams, dancing to the song became viral on TikTok? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bloody Mary (song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bloody Mary (song)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Great work with the additions and referencing on the Cover art and Critical reception sections of the "Mind Your Business" article. Looks a lot more cohesive now!
I've been seeing a lot errors in jazz articles when "cite magazine" or "cite journal" has been used. Have you noticed this? Have you used this citation format? I use "cite web" for anything that comes from the internet. Changing to cite web has fixed many of the errors. Vmavanti (talk) 23:23, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
