User talk:SmudgeBerrySmudgeBerry, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hello. Your edits are breaking the references. You can't just copy text from the article into the source and expect it to work. Please take a few minutes at Help:Contents to see how best to contribute. Also note that inline external links should be used sparingly, see external links for some guidelines. Regards, Mr Stephen (talk) 14:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
PartingtonGreetings. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Your continual removal of referenced information is becoming disruptive. Articles can be updated without removing information and references. For example you can update the population by adding to what is there, not removing it. J3Mrs (talk) 13:35, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
May 2016Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. J3Mrs (talk) 19:05, 3 May 2016 (UTC) We don't just delete referenced information just because a URL has gone dead. What to do is described at Wikipedia:Link rot and has been demonstrated by J3Mrs. Please read up on how to edit. Mr Stephen (talk) 19:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
|